Chemical knowledge for the semantic web

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5109 LNBI, Issue , 2008, Pages 169-176

  Konyk, Mykola ^a   De Leon, Alexander ^a   Dumontier, Michel ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chemistry; Knowledge engineering; Knowledge representation; Life sciences; Mashup; Molecule; Ontology; OWL; Question answering; Semantic web

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHEMOTHERAPY; DATA STRUCTURES; DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG DOSAGE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION THEORY; INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LINGUISTICS; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; SPECIFICATIONS;

CHEMICAL ATTRIBUTES; CHEMICAL INFORMATION; CHEMICAL-; CHEMISTRY; DATA INTEGRATIONS; FILE FORMATS; FORMAL KNOWLEDGE; KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; LEVELS OF DETAILS; LIFE SCIENCES; MASHUP; MOLECULAR DESCRIPTIONS; MOLECULE; OWL; QUESTION ANSWERING; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES; WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE OWL;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 48249142108     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69828-9_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Murray-Rust, P., Rzepa, H.S.: Chemical markup, XML and the World-Wide Web. 2. Information objects and the CMLDOM. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 1113-1123 (2001)
2. Feldman, H.J., Dumontier, M., Ling, S., Haider, N., Hogue, C.W.: CO: A chemical ontology for identification of functional groups and semantic comparison of small molecules. FEBS Lett. 579, 4685-4691 (2005)
3. Brooksbank, C., Cameron, G., Thornton, J.: The European Bioinformatics Institute's data resources: towards systems biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 46-53 (2005)
4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (2001)
5. W3C: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. In: Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.L. (eds.): W3C Recommendation (2004)
6. Horrocks, I.: Applications of Description Logics: State of the Art and Research Challenges. In: Dau, F., Mugnier, M.-L., Stumme, G. (eds.) ICCS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3596, pp. 78-90. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
7. Grenon, P., Smith, B., Goldberg, L.: Biodynamic ontology: applying BFO in the biomedical domain. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 102, 20-38 (2004)
8. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Kohler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A.L., Rosse, C.: Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol. 6, R46 (2005)
9. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P., Sattler, U., Parsia, B., Motik, B., Bechhofer, S., Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.d., Lutz, C.: OWL 1.1 Specification (2006)
10. Wishart, D.S., Knox, C., Guo, A.C., Shrivastava, S., Hassanali, M., Stothard, P., Chang, Z., Woolsey, J.: DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 668-672 (2006)
11. Horridge, M., Drummond, N., Goodwin, J., Rector, A., Stevens, R., Wang, H.H.: The Manchester OWL Syntax. OWL Experiences and Design, Athens, Georgia (2006)
12. Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Sattler, U.: Structured Objects in OWL: Representation and Reasoning. In: 17th Int. World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2008), pp. 169-182. ACM Press, Beijing, China (2008)