Impact of the Mekong River flow alteration on the Tonle Sap flood pulse

Ambio

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 185-192

  Kummu, Matti ^a   Sarkkula, Juha ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER;

DAM; DRY SEASON; FLOODPLAIN; GIS; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT; IRRIGATION; PROTECTED AREA; RESERVOIR; RIVER FLOW; WATER LEVEL;

CAMBODIA; DISASTER; ENVIRONMENT; REVIEW; TREE; WATER FLOW;

CAMBODIA; ENVIRONMENT; FRESH WATER; NATURAL DISASTERS; TREES; WATER MOVEMENTS;

ASIA; CAMBODIA; EURASIA; MEKONG RIVER; SOUTHEAST ASIA; TONLE SAP LAKE;

EID: 48249131677     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[185:IOTMRF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Vörösmarty, C.J. 2000. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. Bioscience 50, 753-765.
2. Water renewal time can be defined as follows: "ratio between its [this case river] total volume and the daily volume flux . . . [] . . . leaving it." Based on (3).
3. Jouon, A., Douillet, P., Ouillon, S. and Fraunie, P. 2006. Calculations of hydrodynamic time parameters in a semi-opened coastal zone using a 3D hydrodynamic model. Cont. Shelf Res. 26, 1395-1415.
4. Golubev, G. 1993. Sustainable water development: Implications for the future. Water Resour. Dev. 9, 127-154.
5. Skole, D.L., Justice, C.O., Townsend, J.R.G. and Janetos, A.C. 1997. A land cover change monitoring program: Strategy for an international effort. Mitig. Adap. Strat. Glob. Change 2, 157-175.
6. Nijssen, B., O'Donnell, G., Hamlet, A. and Lettenmaier, D. 2001. Hydrologic sensitivity of global rivers to climate change. Clim. Change 50, 143-175.
7. Kundzewicz, Z.W., Mata, L.J., Arnell, N.W., Döll, P., Kabat, P., Jiménez, B., Miller, K.A., Oki, T., et al. 2007. Freshwater resources and their management. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., Linden, P.J.v.d. and Hanson, C.E. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 173-210.
8. Kvist, L.P. and Nebel, G. 2001. A review of Peruvian flood plain forests: Ecosystems, inhabitants and resource use. For. Ecol. Manage. 150, 3-26.
9. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 74 pp.
10. Finlayson, C.M. and Spiers, A.G. 1999. Global review of wetland resources and priorities for wetland inventory. Supervising Scientist Report 144/Wetlands International Publication 53, Supervising Scientist, Canberra, Australia.
11. Mekong River Commission (MRC). 2005. Overview of the Hydrology of the Mekong Basin. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 73 pp.
12. Dore, J. and Yu, X. 2004. Yunnan Hydropower Expansion: Update on China's Energy Industry Reforms & the Nu, Lancang & Jinsha Hydropower Dams. Chiang Mai University's Unit for Social and Environmental Research & Green Watershed, Kunming, People's Republic of China, 38 pp.
13. Kummu, M. and Varis, O. 2007. Sediment-related impacts due to upstream reservoir trapping, the Lower Mekong River. Geomorphology 85, 275-293.
14. McCormack, G. 2001. Water margins: Competing paradigms in China. Crit. Asian Stud. 33, 5-30.
15. Plinston, D. and He, D. 1999. Water resources and hydropower. In: ADB TA-3139 Policies and Strategies for Sustainable Development of the Lancang River Basin. Asian Development Bank, Manila, 35 pp.
16. Kummu, M., Varis, O. and Sarkkula, J. 2008. Impacts of land surface changes on regional hydrology - mainland Southeast Asia. In: A Common Need for Action: Global Environmental Change and Development in Monsoon Southeast Asia. Lebel, L., Snidvongs, A., Chen, C-T.A. and Daniel, R. (eds). Gerakbudaya, Kuala Lampur, Malesia. (In press).
17. Adamson, P.T. 2001. Hydrological perspectives on the Lower Mekong Basin: The potential impacts of hydropower developments in Yunnan on the downstream flow regime. Int. Water Power Dam Constr. March 2001, 16-21.
18. Asian Development Bank. 2004. Cumulative Impact Analysis and Nam Theun 2 Contributions. Final Report. Prepared by NORPLAN and EcoLao for Asian Development Bank, Manila, 143 pp.
19. World Bank. 2004. Modelled observations on development scenarios in the Lower Mekong Basin. In: Mekong Regional Water Resources Assistance Strategy. Prepared for the World Bank with Mekong River Commission cooperation, Vientiane, 142 pp.
20. Penny, D. 2008. The Mekong at climatic crossroads: Lessons from the geological past. Ambio 37, 164-169.
21. MRCS/WUP-FIN. Technical Paper No. 5 - Tonle Sap Lake Water Balance Calculations, WUP-FIN Phase II - Hydrological, Environmental and Socio-Economic Modelling Tools for the Lower Mekong Basin Assessment. Mekong River Commission and Finnish Environment Institute Consultancy Consortium, Vientiane, 32 pp.
22. Welcomme, R.L. and Halls, A.S. 2004. Dependence of tropical river fisheries on flow. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Management of Large Rivers for Fisheries. Volume II. RAP Publication 2004/16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Bangkok, pp. 267-283.
23. Lamberts, D. 2006. The Tonle Sap Lake as a productive ecosystem. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 22, 481-195.
24. Lamberts, D. 2008. Little impact, much damage: The consequences of Mekong River flow alterations for the Tonle Sap ecosystem. In: Modern Myths of the Mekong - A Critical Review of Water and Development Concepts, Principles and Policies. Kummu, M., Varis, O. and Keskinen, M. (eds). Water and Development Publications, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, pp. 3-18.
25. Bonheur, N. 2001. Tonle Sap Ecosystem and Value. Technical Coordination Unit for Tonle Sap, Ministry of Environment, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 21 pp.
26. Campbell, I., Poole, C., Giesen, W. and Valbo-Jorgensen, J. 2006. Species diversity and ecology of Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia. Aquat. Sci. Res. Bound. 68, 355-373.
27. Keskinen, M. 2006. The lake with floating villages: A socio-economic analysis of the Tonle Sap Lake. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 22, 463-480.
28. Kummu, M., Sarkkula, J., Koponen, J. and Nikula, J. 2006. Ecosystem management of Tonle Sap Lake: Integrated modelling approach. International Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 22, 497-519.
29. Sverdrup-Jensen, S. 2002. Fisheries in the Lower Mekong Basin: Status and perspectives. MRC Technical Paper No. 6. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh, 103 pp.
30. UNESCO. 2006. Biosphere Reserves-World Network. UNESCO-MAB (Man and the Biosphere) Secretariat, Paris, France. (http://www.unesco.org/mab/)
31. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. 2007. The list of wetlands of international importance. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland. (http://www.ramsar.org/)
32. Junk, W.J. 1997. The Central Amazon Floodplain: Ecology of a Pulsing System. Ecological Studies Volume 126., Springer, Berlin, 525 pp.
33. Kummu, M., Penny, D., Sarkkula, J. and Koponen, J. 2008. Sediment: Curse or blessing for Tonle Sap Lake? Ambio 37, 158-163.
34. JICA. 1999. Cambodia reconnaissance survey digital data. Ministry of Public Works and Transportation (MPWT), Kingdom of Cambodia. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
35. McDonald, A., Pech, B., Phauk, V. and Leev, B. 1997. Plant Communities of the Tonle Sap Floodplain. Contribution to the nomination of the Tonle Sap as Biosphere Reserve for UNESCO's "Man in the Biosphere Program." UNESCO, Phnom Penh, 30 pp.
36. McDonald, A. and Veasna, S. 1996. Floristic reconnaissance of Prek Sramoach lake and vicinity, Tonle Sap. Field document. Participatory natural resources management in the Tonle Sap region project. FAO, Phnom Penh, 72 pp.
37. Danish Hydraulic Institute. 2004. Study on natural reverse flow in the Tonle Sap River. Prepared by DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute) Water & Environment for the Mekong River Commission Secretariat, Vientiane, Lao PDR, 26 pp.
38. Certeza Surveying. 1964. Final Report to the Committee for Coordination of Investigations of the Lower Mekong Basin. Certeza, Quezon City, The Philippines.
39. Mekong River Commission. 1999. Hydrographical Atlas for Tonle Sap. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
40. Mekong River Commission. 2006. Spatial databases of Mekong River Commission. Mekong River Commission (MRC), Vientiane, Lao PDR. (http://www.mrcmekong.org/spatial/data_catalog.htm)
41. The term flood used in this paper for the Tonle Sap Lake is defined in details in Section titled "Method Used for Analyzing the Present Flood-Pulse Characteristics."
42. MRCS/WUP-FIN. 2003. WUP-FIN Phase I: Modelling Tonle Sap for Environmental Impact Assessment and Management Support. Final Report. Mekong River Commission and Finnish Environment Institute Consultancy Consortium, Phnom Penh, 107 pp.
43. Adamson, P. 2006. Hydrological and water resources modelling in the Mekong Region: A brief overview. In: Exploring Water Futures Together: Mekong Region Waters Dialogue. Resource papers from regional dialogue. The World Conservation Union, Thailand Environment Institute, International Water Management Institute, Mekong Program on Water Environment and Resilience, Vientiane, pp. 69-74.
44. Bhaskaran, B. and Mitchell, J.F.B. 1998. Simulated changes in Southeast Asian monsoon precipitation resulting from anthropogenic emissions. Int. J. Climatol. 18, 1455-1462.
45. Hu, Z.-Z., Latif, M., Roeckner, E. and Bengtsson, L. 2000. Intensified Asian summer monsoon and its variability in a coupled model forced by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2681-2684.
46. Falloon, P.D. and Betts, R.A. 2006. The impact of climate change on global river flow in HadGEM1 simulations. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 7, 62-68.
47. Palmer, M.A., Reidy Liermann, C.A., Nilsson, C., Flörke, M., Alcamo, J., Lake, P.S. and Bond, N. 2007. Climate change and the world's river basins: Anticipating management options. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 81-89.
48. Lamberts, D. and Koponen, J. 2008. Flood-pulse alterations and productivity of the Tonle Sap ecosystem: A model for impact assessment. Ambio 37, 178-184.
49. Keskinen, M., Käkönen, M., Prom, T. and Varis, O. 2007. The Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: Water-related conflicts with abundance of water. Econ. Peace Sec. J. 2, 49-59.
50. The authors are grateful to the WUP-FIN team, especially Yin Savuth and Jorma Koponen. The staff at the Water Resources Laboratory of Helsinki University of Technology, particularly Olli Varis, Marko Keskinen, Pertti Vakkilainen, and Tuomo Karvonen are highly acknowledged. We thank also Dirk Lamberts for his continuous support in the ecosystem productivity part of the research, Michael Huggins for proofreading the manuscript, and Des Walling and Dan Penny for their insightful comments on the manuscript. This work has received funding from the Academy of Finland project 211010. The first author was funded by the Academy of Finland project 111672 and Maa-ja vesitekniikan tuki ry. The work was partly completed within the WUP-FIN project under the Mekong River Commission.