Trends in education in environmental assessment: A comparative analysis of European EA-related Master programmes

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 148-158

  Gazzola, Paola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Curriculum; EA education; EA understanding; Environmental assessment; EU Member States; Physical sciences; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION; EUROPEAN UNION; LEARNING; TEACHING;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 48249125397     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/146155108X316397     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alderson, G 1992. Focus on current purposes of public legal education and information in Canada. In National Public Legal Education and Information (PLEI), Policy Consultation Package. Ottawa, Ontario.
2. Aschemann, R 2002. Pros and cons of the EU SEA Directive, paper submitted to the annual meeting of the International Association of Impact Assessment, The Hague. Available at , last accessed 19 June 2007.
3. Bartlett, R V and P A Kurian 1999. The theory of environmental impact assessment: implicit models of policy making. Policy and Politics, 27(1), 415-434.
4. Bina, O 2003. Re-conceptualising strategic environmental assessment: theoretical overview and case study from Chile, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
5. Bosselman, K. 2001. University and sustainability: compatible agendas? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(2), 167-186.
6. Caldwell, P 2004. Preface. In Assessing Impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up, ads. A Morrison-Saunders and J Arts. London: Earthscan.
7. Capper, J 2001. The emerging market for on-line learning: insights from the corporate sector. European Journal of Education, 36(2), 237-245.
8. Cashmore, M 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(4), 403-426.
9. Cashmore, M, R Gwilliam, R Morgan, D Cobb and A Bond 2004. The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(4), 295-310.
10. CEARC, Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council 1988. The Assessment of Cumulative Effects: A Research Prospectus. Hull, Quebec: Minister of Supply and Services Canada. Available at , last accessed 22 June 2007.
11. CSIR, douncil for Scientific and Industrial Research 1996. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): A Primer, CSIR report ENV/S-RR 96001. Pretoria: Division of Water, Environment and Forest Technology.
12. Dalal-Clayton, B and B Sadler 2005. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan.
13. DETR, Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions 1998. Strategic Environmental Appraisal, report of the International Seminar on SEA, Lincoln, 27-29 May 1998. London: DETR.
14. Dusik, J, T B Fischer and B Sadler 2003. Benefits of a Strategic Environmental Assessment. REC and UNDP.
15. Finland Ministry of the Environment 2001. Final report of a workshop on transport planning. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment.
16. Fischer, T B 2002. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Transport and Land Use Planning. London: Earthscan.
17. Fischer, T B and P Gazzola 2006. SEA effectiveness criteria - equally valid in all countries? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(4), 396-409.
18. Fischer, T B and K Seaton 2002. Strategic environmental assessment: effective planning instrument or lost concept? Planning Practice and Research, 17(1), 31-44.
19. Gazzola, P 2006. Adapting Strategic Environmental Assessment for integration in different planning systems, PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.
20. Gazzola, P (forthcoming). Existing EA-related Master degree programmes in the EU: an analysis - Concepts, principles and key modules. Chapter 5 in EA Lecturers' Handbook and Curriculum for EA-related Master Programmes, eds. T B Fischer, P Gazzola, U Jha-Thakur, I Belcakova and R Aschemann. ROAD Bratislava University Press.
21. Gerber, R 2001. The state of geographical education in countries around the world. International Research on Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(4), 349-362.
22. Glasson, J 1999. Environmental impact assessment: impact on decisions. Chapter 7 in Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol. 1, ed. J Petts. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
23. Glasson, J, R Therivel and A Chadwick 1994. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. London: UCL Press.
24. Gordon, J 2005. Editorial. European Journal of Education, 40(4), 353-360.
25. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 1980. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
26. Japan Ministry of the Environment 2000. A study to introduce SEA system in Japan, report of the Study Group on Strategic Environmental Assessment, Kasumigaseki, Tokyo.
27. Jay, S, C Jones, P Slinn, and C Wood 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(4), 287-300.
28. Jha-Thakur, U (forthcoming). Internationalisation of Master degree programmes - Reflecting on the European Bologna process. Chapter 2 in EA Lecturers' Handbook and Curriculum for EA related Master Programmes, eds. T B Fischer, P Gazzola, U Jha-Thakur, I Belcakova and R Aschemann. ROAD Bratislava University Press.
29. Kennedy, W V 1988. Environmental impact assessment in North America, Western Europe: what has worked where, how and why? International Environmental Reporter, 11, 257-262.
30. Lawrence, D P 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment:practical solutions to recurrent problems, Hoboken NJ : John Wiley and Sons.
31. Lee, N and C George eds. 2000. Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
32. Lee, N, C Wood and V Gazidellis eds. 1985. Arrangement for environmental impact assessment and training implication in the European Communities and North America: country studies. Manchester: Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Manchester.
33. Leroy, P, H Van den Bosch and S Ligthart 2001. The role of project-based learning in the political and social sciences of the environment curriculum at Nijmegen university, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2(1), 8-20.
34. Marsden, S and S Dovers eds. 2002. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Australasia. Sydney: The Federation Press.
35. Nooteboom, S 1999. Environmental assessments of strategic decisions and project decisions: interactions and benefits. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment of The Netherlands with support of the European Commission.
36. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2006. Applying strategic environmental assessment: good practice guidance for development co-operation, DAC guidelines and reference series. Available at , last accessed 20 June 2007.
37. Onyango, V and M Schmidt 2007. Towards a strategic environment assessment framework in Kenya - highlighting areas for further scrutiny. Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal, 18(3), 309-328.
38. Ortolano, L 1993. Controls on project proponents and environmental impact assessment effectiveness, The Environmental Professional, 15, 352-363.
39. Ortolano, L, B Jenkins and R P Abracosa 1987. Speculations on when and why EIA is effective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7, 27-92.
40. Owens, S, T Rayner and O Bina 2004. New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice and research. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1943-1959.
41. Partidario, M R 2003. SEA training course manual, International Association for Impact Assessment. available at , last accessed 29 June 2007.
42. Partidario, M R and R Clark eds. 2000. Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
43. Pechar, H and A Pellert 2004. Austrian universities under pressure from Bologna. European Journal of Education, 39(3), 317-330.
44. Petts, J ed. 1999. Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessment, vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
45. Ravetz, J 2000. Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(1), 31-64.
46. Runhaar, H and P P J Driessen 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25(1), 2-14.
47. Sadler, B 1996. Environmental Assessment in a Changing World, Final Report of the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment, IAIA and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.
48. Sadler, B 1999. A framework for environmental sustainability assessment and assurance. In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol. 1, ed. J Petts. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
49. Sadler, B and R Verheem 1996. Strategic Environmental Assessment: Status, Challenges and Future Directions. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment of the Netherlands.
50. Sinclair, J and A Diduck 1995. Public education: an undervalued component of the environmental assessment public involvement process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15(3), 219-240.
51. Spricis, A 2001. The study programme "environmental protection and impact assessment" at the University of Latvia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2(4), 339-348.
52. Stelmack, C M, A J Sinclair and P Fitzpatrick 2005. An overview of the state of environmental assessment education at Canadian universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(1), 36-53.
53. Therivel, R and L Brown, L 1999. Methods of strategic environmental assessment. In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol. 1, ed. J Petts. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
54. Therivel, R, P Caratti, M R Partidario, A H Theodorsdottir and D Tyldesley 2004. Writing strategic environmental assessment guidance. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(4), 259-270.
55. Therivel, R, E Wilson, S Thompson, D Heaney and D Pritchard 1992. Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
56. Thomas, I 1992. Imbibing wisdom of environmental impact assessment. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 33-43.
57. UN, United Nations 2007. UN Millennium Development Goals. Available at , last accessed 20 June 2007.
58. Underwood, P B and C Alton 2003. Could the SEA Directive succeed within the United States? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(3), 259-261.
59. University of Sussex 2004. International Student Mobility, report commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Council for England HEFCE). Sussex Centre for Migration Research, University of Sussex. Available at , last accessed 21 March 2007.
60. Verheem, R and SEA Section of IAIA 2002. Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria. IAIA Special Publications, Series No. 1.
61. Wachter, B 2004. The Bologna process: development and prospects. European Journal of Education, 39(3), 431-441.
62. Wathern, P ed. 1988. Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice. London: Unwin Hyman.
63. WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Wood, C 1985. Canada. In Arrangement for environmental impact assessment and training implication in the European Communities and North America: country studies, eds. N Lee, C Wood and V Gazidellis. Manchester: Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Manchester.
65. Wood, C 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
66. World Bank 1987. Environment, growth and development. Development committee paper no. 14. Washington DC: World Bank.