Manual top hat wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty

Cornea

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 521-526

  Bahar, Irit ^a,b   Kaiserman, Igor ^a   Srinivasan, Sathish ^a   Berger, Yoav ^a   McAllum, Penny ^a   Slomovic, Allan ^a   Rootman, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Penetrating keratoplasty; Top hat

Indexed keywords

CEFAZOLIN; TOBRAMYCIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CELL COUNT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONGENITAL CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATITIS; KERATOCONUS; KERATOPATHY; MALE; MANUAL TOP HAT PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MYOPIA; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DETACHMENT; SUTURE REMOVAL; VISUAL ACUITY; WOUND DEHISCENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; EYE REFRACTION; KERATOMETRY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASTIGMATISM; CELL COUNT; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 48249112614     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181609300     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Davison JA, Bourne WM. Results of penetrating keratoplasty using a double running suture technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:1591-1595.
2. Perlman EM. An analysis and interpretation of refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:39-45.
3. Samples JR, Binder PS. Visual acuity, refractive error, and astigmatism following corneal transplantation for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:1554-1560.
4. Musch DC, Meyer RF, Sugar A. The effect of removing running sutures on astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:488-492.
5. Binder PS. The effect of suture removal on post keratoplasty astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;105:637-645.
6. McNeill JI, Kaufman HE. A double running suture technique for kera-toplasty: earlier visual rehabilitation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1977;8:58-61.
7. McNeill JI, Wessels IF. Adjustment of single continuous suture to control astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989;5: 216-223.
8. Musch DC, Meyer RF, Sugar A, et al. Corneal astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:698-703.
9. Van Meter WS, Gussler JR, Soloman KD, et al. Postkeratoplasty astigmatism control. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:177-183.
10. Assil KK, Zarnegar SR, Schanzlin DJ. Visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty with double continuous or combined interrupted and continuous suture wound closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;114:63-71.
11. De Molfetta V, Brambilla M, De Casa N, et al. Residual corneal astigmatism after perforating keratoplasty. Ophthalmologica. 1980;179:316-321.
12. Lin DT, Wilson SE, Reidy JJ, et al. Topographic changes that occur with 10-0 nylon suture removal following keratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg. 1990;6:21-25.
13. Mader TH, Yuan R, Lynn MJ, et al. Changes in keratometric astigmatism after suture removal more than one year after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:119-127.
14. Davis EA, Azar DT, Jakobs FM, et al. Refractive and keratometric results after triple procedure: experience with early and late suture removal. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:624-630.
15. Binder PS, Abel R, Polack FM, et al. Keratoplasty wound separations. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;80:109-115.
16. Farley MK, Pettit TH. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104:44-49.
17. Rehany U, Rumelt S. Ocular trauma following penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1282-1286.
18. Tseng SH, Lin SC, Chen FK. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1999;18:553-558.
19. Busin M. A new lamellar wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:260-265.
20. Barraquer J, Rutllan J. Microsurgery of the Cornea: An Atlas and Textbook. Barcelona: Ediciones Scriba;1984.
21. Ignacio TS, Nguyen TB, Chuck RS, et al. Top hat wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser: a laboratory model. Cornea. 2006;25:336-340.
22. Steinert RF, Ignacio TS, Sarayba MA. ''Top hat''-shaped penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143: 689-691.
23. Buratto L, Bohm E. The use of the femtosecond laser in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:737-742.
24. Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Bhartiya P, et al. Central penetrating keratoplasty with peripheral intrastromal tuck. Cornea. 2005;24:947-950.
25. Obata H, Ishida K, Murao M, et al. Corneal endothelial cell damage in penetrating keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:411-416.
26. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, et al. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1855-1865.
27. Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:311-319.
28. Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Maguire LJ, et al. Comparison of Chen medium and Optisol-GS for human corneal preservation at 4 degrees Celsius. Cornea. 2001;20:683-686.
29. Lass JH, Bourne WM, Musch DC, et al. A randomized, prospective, double masked clinical trial of Optisol vs. Dexsol corneal storage media. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1404-1408.
30. Frueh BE, Bohnke M. Prospective, randomized clinical evaluation of Optisol vs. organ culture corneal storage media. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:757-760.