SPIT identification criteria implementation: Effectiveness and lessons learned

IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

Volumn 278, Issue , 2008, Pages 381-395

  Dritsas, Stelios ^a   Soupionis, Yannis ^a   Theoharidou, Marianthi ^a   Mallios, Yannis ^b   Gritzalis, Dimitris ^a  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SECURITY OF DATA;

IDENTIFICATION CRITERION; MANAGEMENT PROCESS; SESSION INITIATION PROTOCOL; SPAM OVER INTERNET TELEPHONIES (SPIT);

INTERNET TELEPHONY;

EID: 48249108271     PISSN: 15715736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09699-5_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Baumann R., Cavin S., Schmid S.: Voice Over IP - Security and Spit. Swiss Army, FU Br 41, KryptDet Report, Univ. of Berne (2006)
2. Croft, N., Olivier,M.: A Model for Spam Prevention in Voice over IP Networks using Anonymous Verifying Authorities. In: Venter, H.S. et al. (eds.) Proc. of the 5th Annual Information Security South Africa Conf., South Africa (2005)
3. Dantu R., Kolan P.: Detecting Spam in VoIP Networks. In: Proc. of Steps to Reducing Unwanted Traffic on the Internet Workshop, USA (2005)
4. Dongwook S., Jinyoung A., Choon S.: Progressive Multi Gray-Leveling: A Voice Spam Protection Algorithm. IEEE Network, 20(5), 18-24 (2006)
5. Dritsas S., Mallios J., Theoharidou M.,Marias G., Gritzalis D.: Threat Analysis of the Session Initiation Protocol Regarding Spam. In Proc. of the 3rd IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Assurance (26th IEEE International Performance Computing and Communications Conference), IEEE Press, pp. 426-433, New Orleans (2007)
6. Madhosingh B.: The Design of a Differentiated SIP to Control VoIP Spam. Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Florida State University (2006)
7. Marias G., Dritsas S., Theoharidou M., Mallios J., Gritzalis D.: SIP vulnerabilities and anti-SPIT mechanisms assessment. In Proc. of the 16th IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN '07), IEEE Press, Hawaii, pp. 597-604 (2007)
8. Mathieu, B. et al.: Spit Mitigation by a Network-Level Anti-Spit Entity. In: Proc. of the 3rd Annual VoIP Security Workshop, Germany (2006)
9. Niccolini S.: Spit prevention: State of the art and research challenges. Network Laboratories, NEC Europe, Germany (2006)
10. Park S., Kim J., Kang S.: Analysis of applicability of traditional spam regulations to VoIP spam. In: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. of the Advanced Communication Technology, Phoenix Park, Korea (2006)
11. Peterson J., Jennings C.: Enhancements for Authenticated Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol. RFC 4474 (2006)
12. Rebahi Y., Sisalem D.: SIP service providers and the spam problem. In: Proc. of the Voice over IP Security Workshop, Washington, USA (2005)
13. Rebahi, Y., Sisalem, D., Magedanz T.: SIP Spam Detection. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Digital Telecommunications, pp. 29-31, France (2006)
14. Rosenberg, J. et al.: Session Initiation Protocol. RFC 3261 (2002)
15. Rosenberg J., Jennings C.: The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Spam. draft-ietf-sipping-spam-03 (2006)
16. SER server version 2.0, Available via www.iptel.org/ser. Cited 10 Jan 2008
17. Srivastava K., Schulzrinne H.: Preventing Spam For SIP-based Instant Messages and Sessions. Technical Report, University of Columbia (2004)
18. Tschofenig H. et al.: Using SAML to Protect the Session Initiation Protocol. IEEE Network, 20(5), 14-17 (2006)