Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method

Transfusion

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1693-1698

  Yamada, Chisa ^a,b   Serrano Rahman, Leana ^b   Vasovic, Ljiljana V ^b   Mohandas, Kala ^b   Uehlinger, Joan ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOANTIBODY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ANTIBODY; MACROGOL;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERYTHROCYTE ADHESIVENESS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SOLID PHASE RED CELL ADHERENCE ASSAY; TUBE POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL ANTIGLOBULIN ANTIBODY IDENTIFICATION METHOD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BLOOD GROUP ANTIGENS; BLOOD GROUPING AND CROSSMATCHING; COOMBS' TEST; EPITOPES; ERYTHROCYTES; HUMANS; ISOANTIBODIES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 48249104736     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01736.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Technical manual. Chapter 12. 15th ed. Bethesda (MD) : American Association of Blood Banks 2005.
2. Nance SJ, Garratty G. A new potentiator of red blood cell antigen-antibody reactions. Am J Clin Pathol 1987 87 : 633 5.
3. Carter JE, Gallego M, Stubbs JR. The identification of red cell antibodies: a comparative study of a solid phase red cell adherence system, a gel system, and agglutination testing. Am J Clin Pathol 1997 107 : 486 7.
4. Reilly B, DePalma H, Cosgrove P, Parsi M, Grima K. Comparison study between routine tube test (LISS), PEG tube test, gel technology and solid phase red cell adherence assays. Transfusion 1997 37 (Suppl 64S.
5. Bunker ML, Thomas CL, Geyer SJ. Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods. Transfusion 2001 41 : 621 6.
6. Shulman IA, Maffei LM, Downes KA. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001-2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001-2004. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005 129 : 984 9.
7. Issitt PD, Combs MR, Bradshaw T. Comparison of a solid phase and polyethylene glycol (PEG) IAT method in a large transfusion service. Transfusion 1997 37 (Suppl 28S.
8. Combs MR, Issitt PD. Use of a solid phase method as an adjunct procedure in antibody identification. Transfusion 1997 37 (Suppl 31S.
9. Jarosz CR, Paglin A, Silberman S, Urani J. Evaluation of the ABS2000 in a tertiary care hospital. Transfusion 2000 40 (Suppl 124S.
10. Weisbach V, Ziener A, Zimmermann R, Glaser A, Zingsem J, Eckstein R. Comparison of the performance of four microtube column agglutination systems in the detection of red cell alloantibodies. Transfusion 1999 39 : 1045 50.
11. Matson GA, Coe J, Swanson J. Hemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Lea. Blood 1955 10 : 1236 40.
12. Roy RB, Wesley RH, Fitzgerald JD. Haemolytic transfusion reaction caused by anti-Le. Vox Sang 1960 5 : 546 50.
13. Thakral B, Jain A, Saluja K, Sharma RR, Singh TS, Marwaha N. Acute haemolytic transfusion reaction by Le(a) alloantibody. Am J Hematol 2006 81 : 807 8.
14. Alperin JB, Riglin H, Branch DR, Gallagher MT, Petz LD. Anti-M causing delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction. Transfusion 1983 23 : 322 4.
15. Sancho JM, Pujol M, Fernandez F, Soler M, Manzano P, Feliu E. Delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-M antibody. Br J Haematol 1998 103 : 268 9.
16. Parry-Jones N, Gore ME, Taylor J, Treleaven JG. Delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction caused by anti-M antibody in a patient receiving interleukin-2 and interferon for metastatic renal cell cancer. Clin Lab Haematol 1999 21 : 407 8.