Reply to "Standardized vs. customary ordinary cokriging..." by A. Papritz

Geoderma

Volumn 146, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 397-399

  Bishop, T F A ^a   Lark, R M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; KRIGING; SOIL ANALYSIS;

EID: 48149114842     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bishop T.F.A., and Lark R.M. The geostatistical analysis of experiments at the landscape-scale. Geoderma 133 (2006) 87-106
2. Bishop T.F.A., and Lark R.M. A landscape-scale experiment on the changes in available potassium over a winter wheat cropping season. Geoderma 141 (2007) 384-396
3. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation (1997), Oxford University Press, New York, USA
4. IMSL. IMSL MATH/LIBRARY User's Manual, Version 3.0 (1994), Visual Numerics, Houston, Texas, USA
5. Lark R.M. A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey. European Journal of Soil Science 51 (2000) 137-157
6. Lark R.M. Robust estimation of the pseudo cross-variogram for cokriging soil properties. European Journal of Soil Science 53 (2002) 253-270
7. Papritz A. Standardized vs. customary cokriging: some comments on the article "The geostatistical analysis of experiments at the landscape-scale" by T.F.A. Bishop & R.M. Lark. Geoderma 146 (2008) 391-396
8. Papritz A., and Flühler H. Temporal change of spatially autocorrelated soil properties: optimal estimation by cokriging. Geoderma 62 (1994) 29-43
9. Papritz A., Kunsch H.R., and Webster R. On the pseudo cross-semivariogram. Mathematical Geology 25 (1993) 1015-1026