Evaluation of Mexico ́s 1975-2000 energy plan

Energy Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 2569-2586

  Bazán Perkins, Sergio D ^a   Fernández Zayas, José L ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Energy planning; Long term scenarios; Mexican power program; Mix integer linear programming; Non fossil power plants

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCES; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; FOSSIL FUELS; HYDROCARBONS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; POWER PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

21ST CENTURY; ENERGY FUTURE; ENERGY PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS; FOSSIL-FUEL PLANTS; NUCLEAR PLANTS; POWER SUPPLIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES (RES); TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES;

FUELS;

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY PLANNING; FOSSIL FUEL; FUEL CONSUMPTION; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 48149100774     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bauer M., and Quintanilla J. Conflicting energy, environment, economy policies in Mexico. Energy Policy 28 5 (2000) 321-326
2. Bazán-Barrón S. Distribution and metalogenesis of the Uranium Mesozoic County of Mexico. Geomimet 112 (1981) 65-96
3. Bazán-Barrón S. Proven reserves of oil were indiscriminately "inflated". El Universal Newspaper, Financial Section (1994) Mexico
4. Bazán-Perkins S.D. Nuclear energy as a basis to meet the electricity demand in the long term. IV National Meeting of Earth Sciences, SS3-37 (2004) 309-310 31 October-5 November (Mexico)
5. Bazán-Perkins S.D. Economic competitiveness of the geothermal power in Mexico. IV National Meeting of Earth Sciences, SE15-14 (2004) 278-279 31 October-5 November (Mexico)
6. Bazán-Perkins, S.D., 2005. Nuclear Energy a Sustainable Alternative to Solve the Electric Demands in Mexico. Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología 4 (3-4), 187-205 and 281-298 (Mexico).
7. Beér J.M. Combustion technology developments in power generation in response to environmental challenges. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 26 4-6 (2000) 301-327
8. Carpentier J., and Merlin A. Optimization methods in planning and operation. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 4 1 (1982) 11-18
9. CEFP (Center of Studies of the Public Finances), 2001. Evolution and Perspective of the Energy Sector in Mexico 1970-2000. Deputies House, H. Congress of the Union, CEFP/051/2001 (Mexico).
10. Clark II W.W. Partnerships in creating agile sustainable development communities. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 3 (2007) 294-302
11. Clark W., and Lund H. Sustainable development in practice. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 3 (2007) 253-258
12. Cleveland C.J., and Kaufmann R.K. Oil supply and oil politics: déjà vu all over again. Energy Policy 31 6 (2002) 485-489
13. COPAR (Costs and Parameters of Reference). Of Generation, Management of Evaluation and Programming of Investments, several reports (1998-2006), CFE, Mexico Table A.1
14. De Buen L.O. Energy policy in the federal commission of electricity. VII Biennial National Assembly of the School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineers (1976) (Mexico)
15. Dechamps, C., 1983. Optimization in Electric Power System Planning Proceedings of the Arab School on Science and Technology. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Power Systems Analysis and Planning, Corporation. Washington, USA, p. 2001-2008.
16. Demirbas A. Energy balance, energy sources, energy policy, future developments and energy investments in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 42 10 (2001) 1239-1258
17. EIA (Energy Information Administration), 2003. International Energy Outlook 2003, DOE/EIA-0484 (2003), Washington, DC. USA.
18. EIA (Energy Information Administration). International Energy Annual 2005 (2006) Washington, D.C. USA
19. Eibenschutz J., Guillen S.T., and Fernández-Zayas J.L. Proposal of Limits for Energy Policy, SePaNal (National Patrimony Secretariat) (1976), Energy Commission, (Mexico)
20. Ferenc L.T., and Hans-Holger R. Oil and nuclear power: past, present and future. Energy Economics 28 1 (2006) 1-25
21. Fernández-Zayas J.L. Energy alternatives for Mexico. FICA (2001) 32 (Mexico)
22. Fernández-Zayas J.L. Current Possibilities of the Hydrogen like Energy in Mexico, Sener (Mexico) (2003)
23. Fernández-Zayas J.L. We need more resources human in Energy. First Seminar of Energy and Science, Mexican Academy of Science, AMC/08/06 (2006) (Mexico)
24. GE (General Electric Company). Advanced Boiling Water Reactor General Plant Description, First of the Next Generation (2000)
25. Georgopoulou E., Sarafidis Y., Mirasgedis S., and Lalas D.P. Next allocation phase of the EU emissions trading scheme: how tough will the future be?. Energy Policy 34 18 (2006) 4002-4023
26. González-Reyna J. Mining Wealth and Minerals Ore in Mexico (1956), Banco de México, (Mexico)
27. Hiriart G., and Andaluz J.I. Strategies and economics of geothermal power development in México. World Geothermal Congress 2000, Kyushu-Tahoku, Japan, May 28-June 10 (2000)
28. Huacuz J.M. The road to green power in Mexico-reflections on the Prospects for the large-scale and sustainable implementation of renewable energy. Energy Policy 33 16 (2005) 2087-2099
29. IMF (International Monetary Fund), 2006. Transcript of a Press Conference by IMF Managing Director Rodrigo de Rato and First Deputy Managing Director Anne O. Krueger with Thomas C. Dawson, Director, External Relations. IMF News, April 20. Washington (USA) (http://www.imf.org/external/news/default.aspx, last access 06.11.2006).
30. INEGI (National Institute of Statistic and Geography and Computer Science). The Energy Sector of Mexico (2002) (Mexico)
31. INEGI (National Institute of Statistic and Geography and Computer Science). Production of Petroleum for Type and Natural Gas (2006) (Mexico)
32. Kadak A.C., Ballinger R.G., Alvey T., Kang C.W., Owen P., Smith A., Wright M., and Yao X. Nuclear Power Plant Design Project. A response to the environmental and economic challenge of global warming, phase 1 (1998), Review of Options & Selection of Technology of Choice. MIT 56 January
33. Krautkraemer J.A. Nonrenewable resource scarcity. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1998) 2065-2107
34. Krichene N. World crude oil and natural gas: a demand and supply model. Energy Economics 24 6 (2002) 557-576
35. Krichene N. A Simultaneous Equations Model for World Crude Oil and Natural Gas Markets (2006), International Monetary Fund (IMF) 25 WP/05/32
36. Manzini F.J.I., and Martínez M. Using final energies to plan a sustainable future for Mexico. Energy 24 11 (1999) 945-958
37. Manzini F.J.I., and Martínez M. Cost-benefit analysis of energy scenarios for the Mexican Power Sector. Energy 28 10 (2003) 979-992
38. Massé P., and Gibrat R. Application of linear programming to investments in the electric power industry. Management Science 3 1 (1957) 149-166
39. Monteforte R. The organization of the Mexican electric sector: international context of change. Documents of Analysis and Prospective, PUE, UNAM (1991) 89 Mexico
40. Murphy, F.H., Smeers, Y., 2002. Generation Capacity Expansion in Imperfectly Competitive Restructured Electricity Markets, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, CORE, University Catholique de Louvain, Discussion Papers.
41. Nakata T. Analysis of the impacts of nuclear phase-out on energy systems in Japan. Energy 27 4 (2002) 363-377
42. Nakata T. Energy-economic models and the environment. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 30 4 (2004) 417-475
43. NEI (Nuclear Energy Institute). The Outlook Nuclear for Energy in to Competitive Electricity Business (2002)
44. NEI (Nuclear Energy Institute). America's new for nuclear energy. AGMA/ABMA Annual Meeting, March 3, 2006 (2006), Walter Hill Nuclear Energy Institute
45. NERI (Nuclear Energy Institute). Nuclear energy research initiative. Report Annual (2002) 137
46. PEMEX (Mexican Petroleum Agency). Proceedings. Operative and Financial Results (1990-2004) Mexico
47. Peterson T.D., and Rose A.Z. Reducing conflicts between climate policy and energy policy in the US: the important role of the states. Energy Policy 34 5 (2006) 619-631
48. Sener (Secretary of Energy). Prospective of the Electric Sector 2001-2010 (2002) Mexico
49. Sener (Secretary of Energy). Natural Gas Prospective 2004-2013 (2004) Mexico
50. Sener (Secretary of Energy). Energy Statistics: Basic Indicators (2005) Mexico
51. Sener (Secretary of Energy). Prospective of the Electric Sector 2005-2014 (2006) Mexico
52. Shields D. Pemex: an uncertain future. Topics of Today (2003), Editorial Planeta, Mexico
53. Subki I. Indonesian requirements for future nuclear power plants. Progress in Nuclear Energy 29 1 (1995) 107-114
54. Suzuki M. Realization of a Sustainable Society: Zero Emission Approaches (2002), United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan
55. UC (University of Chicago). The Economic Future Nuclear of Power. A Study Conducted at The University of Chicago (2004)
56. US-DE (United States Department of Energy Cooperative Agreement), 2004. Study of Construction Technologies and Schedules, O &M Staffing and Cost, Decommissioning Costs and Fundings Requirements for Advanced Reactor Designs, DE-FC07-03ID 14492 Contract DE-AT01-020NE23476, p. 246.
57. Wiser R., and Bolinger M. Balancing cost and risk: the treatment of renewable energy in western utility resource plans. The Electricity Journal 19 1 (2006) 48-59
58. WNA (Nuclear Word Association). Energy for sustainable development. Advanced Reactors (2003) September 2003
59. Yañez C.E. Diverse aspects of the atmospheric pollution and their solutions. Geomimet 1 63 (1973) 20-22
60. Zamzam M.J., Hwee W.K., and Kamaruddin N. Greener energy solutions for a sustainable future: issues and challenges for Malaysia. Energy Policy 31 11 (2003) 1061-1072