Rapid-REM: A MATLAB simulator of the replaced-elements model

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 435-441

  Schultheis, Holger ^a   Thorwart, Anna ^b   Lachnit, Harald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 48149099285     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.2.435     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BRANDON, S. E., VOGEL, E. H., & WAGNER, A. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110, 67-72.
2. GLAUTIER, S. (2004). Asymmetry of generalization decrement in causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 315-329.
3. GLAUTIER, S. (2007). Simulation of associative learning with the replaced elements model. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 993-1000.
4. LACHNIT, H., SCHULTHEIS, H., KÖNIG, S., ÜNGÖR, M., & MELCHERS, K. G. (in press). Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: A case for attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
5. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
6. PEARCE, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
7. PEARCE, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
8. PEARCE, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 73-95.
9. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
10. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
11. WAGNER, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. WAGNER, A. R. (2003). Context-sensitive elemental theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 7-29.
13. WAGNER, A. R., & BRANDON, S. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 23-64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. WAGNER, A. R., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and learning (pp. 301-340). London: Academic Press.