Evaluation of a decision support system for interpretation of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1523-1529

  Lomsky, Milan ^a   Gjertsson, Peter ^a   Johansson, Lena ^a   Richter, Jens ^b   Ohlsson, Mattias ^c   Tout, Deborah ^d   Van Aswegen, Andries ^d   Underwood, S Richard ^d,e   Edenbrandt, Lars ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b EXINI Diagnostics AB   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer assisted; Heart disease; Heart function tests; Image interpretation; Neural networks (computer); Radionuclide imaging

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TRAINING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; CHILD; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; GATED BLOOD-POOL IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 48149085300     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0746-9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. R Hachamovitch DS Berman LJ Shaw H Kiat I Cohen JA Cabico 1998 Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction Circulation. 97 535 43 Erratum in: Circulation 1998;98:190
2. X Kang DS Berman KS Van Train AM Amanullah J Areeda JD Friedman 1997 Clinical validation of automatic quantitative defect size in rest technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Med. 38 1441 6
3. DS Berman X Kang KF Van Train HC Lewin I Cohen J Areeda 1998 Comparative prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis versus semiquantitative visual analysis of exercise myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol. 32 1987 95
4. D Lindahl J Lanke A Lundin J Palmer L Edenbrandt 1999 Improved classifications of myocardial bull's-eye scintigrams with computer-based decision support system J Nucl Med. 40 96 101
5. P Gjertsson M Lomsky J Richter M Ohlsson DA Tout A Van Aswegen 2006 The added value of ECG-gating for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and artificial neural networks Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 26 5 301 4 Sep
6. G Germano H Kiat PB Kavanagh M Moriel M Mazzanti HT Su 1995 Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Med. 36 2138 47
7. T Sharir G Germano P Waechter PB Kavanagh JS Areeda J Gerlach 2000 A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I. Validation and diagnostic yield J Nucl Med. 41 720 7
8. KF Van Train J Areeda EV Garcia CD Cooke J Maddahi H Kiat 1993 Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality J Nucl Med. 34 1494 502
9. M Lomsky J Richter L Johansson H El-Ali K Åström M Ljungberg 2005 A new automated method for analysis of gated-SPECT images based on a 3-dimensional heart shaped model Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 25 234 40
10. M Lomsky J Richter L Johansson PF Høilund-Carlsen L Edenbrandt 2006 Validation of a new automated method for analysis of gated-SPECT images Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 26 139 45
11. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, eds. Parallel distributed processing, vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986.
12. T Rögnvaldsson 1994 On Langevin updating in multiplayer perceptrons Neural Comput. 6 916 26
13. Hanson SJ, Pratt LY. Comparing biases for minimal network construction with backpropagation. In: Touretzky DS, editor. Advances in neural information processing systems. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann; 1998. p. 177-85.
14. KF Van Train EV Garcia J Maddahi J Areeda CD Cooke H Kiat 1994 Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial tomograms J Nucl Med. 35 609 18
15. Riffenburgh RH. Statistics in medicine. London: Academic; 1999.
16. D Lindahl J Toft B Hesse J Palmer S Ali A Lundin 2000 Scandinavian test of artificial neural network for classification of myocardial perfusion images Clin Physiol. 20 253 61
17. B Heden H Ohlin R Rittner L Edenbrandt 1997 Acute myocardial infarction detected in the 12-lead ECG by artificial neural networks Circulation. 96 1798 802