Cellular phone use while driving: A methodological checklist for investigating dual-task costs

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 347-361

  Dressel, Jeffrey ^a   Atchley, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Cell phones; Driver behavior; Human factors

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CELLULAR TELEPHONES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; TELEPHONE SETS;

ATTENTION; CELL PHONE; CELLULAR PHONE; COGNITIVE DEMANDS; COGNITIVE TASK; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; DUAL-TASKS; MOTOR VEHICLE;

MOBILE PHONES;

EID: 48049117994     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Atchley P., and Dressel J. Conversation limits the functional field of view. Human Factors 46 (2004) 664-673
2. Amado S., and Ulupinar P. The effects of conversation on attention and peripheral detection: Is talking with a passenger and talking on the cell phone different?. Transportation Research: Part F 8 (2005) 383-395
3. Baddeley A.D. A 3 minute reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychonomic Science 10 (1968) 341-342
4. Briem V., and Hedman L.R. Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics 38 (1995) 2536-2562
5. Brown I.D., Tickner A.H., and Simmonds D.C.V. Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology 53 (1969) 419-424
6. Consiglio W., Driscoll P., Witte M., and Berg W.P. Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35 (2003) 495-500
7. Goode K.T., Ball K.K., Sloane M., Roenker D.L., Roth D.L., Myers R.S., and Owsley C. Useful field of view and other neurocognitive indicators of crash risk in older adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 5 (1998) 425-440
8. Gopher D., and Braune R. On the psychophysics of workload - Why bother with subjective measures?. Human Factors 26 (1984) 519-532
9. Gopher D., and Navon D. How is performance limited: Testing the notion of central capacity. Acta Psychologica 46 (1980) 161-180
10. Gopher D., and Donchin E. Workload - An examination of the concept. In: Boff K.R., Kaufman L., and Thomas J.P. (Eds). Handbook of human perception and performance: Vol. II. Cognitive processes and performance (1986), John Wiley & Sons, New York
11. Hart, and Staveland. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P.A., and Meshkati N. (Eds). Human mental workload (1988), North Holland Press, Amsterdam 239-250
12. Horberry T., Anderson J., Regan M., Triggs T., and Brown J. Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity, and age on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38 (2006) 185-191
13. Horswill M.S., and McKenna F.P. The effect of interference on dynamic risk-taking judgments. British Journal of Psychology 90 (1999) 189-199
14. Jamson A.H., Westerman S.J., Hockey G.R.J., and Carsten O.M.J. Speech-based e-mail and driver behavior: Effects of an in-vehicle message system interface. Human Factors 46 (2004) 625-639
15. Lee J.D., Caven B., Haake S., and Brown T.L. Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers' attention to the roadway. Human Factors 43 (2001) 631-640
16. McCarley J.S., Vais M.J., Pringle H., Kramer A.F., Irwin D.E., and Strayer D.L. Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes. Human Factors 46 (2004) 424-436
17. McKnight A.J., and McKnight A.S. The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis and Prevention 25 (1993) 259-265
18. Norman D.A., and Bobrow D.G. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology 7 (1975) 502-507
19. Norman D.A., and Bobrow D.G. On the analysis of performance operating characteristics. Psychological Review 83 (1976) 508-510
20. Paas F., Tuovinen J., Tabbers H., and Van Gerven P.W.M. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist 38 (2003) 63-71
21. Rakauskas M.E., Gugerty L.J., and Ward N.J. Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research 35 (2004) 453-464
22. Recarte M.A., and Nunes L.M. Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery task on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6 (2000) 31-43
23. Redelmeier D.A., and Tibshirani R.J. Association between cellular-phone calls and motor vehicle collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine 336 (1997) 453-458
24. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., and Clark J.J. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 368-373
25. Sanders A. Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field. Ergonomics 13 (1970) 101-117
26. Shinar D., Tractinsky N., and Compton R. Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 37 (2005) 315-326
27. Simons D.J., and Levin D.T. Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science 1 (1997) 261-267
28. Sperling G., and Dosher B.A. Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In: Boff K., Kaufman L., and Thomas J. (Eds). Handbook of perception and performance (1986), Wiley, New York
29. Strayer D.L., and Drews F.A. Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors 46 (2004) 640-649
30. Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Crouch, D. J. (2004). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working paper 04-13.
31. Strayer D.L., Drews F.A., and Johnston W.A. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9 (2003) 23-32
32. Strayer D.L., and Johnston W.A. Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 462-467
33. Stutts, J. C., Reinfurt, D. W., Staplin, L., & Rodgman, E. A. (2001). The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. .
34. Sullman M.J.M., and Baas P.H. Mobile phone use amongst New Zealand drivers. Transportation Research: Part F 7 (2004) 95-105
35. Tsang P.S., and Velaquez V.L. Diagnosticity and multidimensional subjective workload ratings. Ergonomics 39 (1996) 358-381
36. Violanti J.M., and Marshall J.R. Cellular phones and traffic accidents: An epidemiological approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention 28 (1996) 265-270
37. Wang, J. S., Knipling, R. R., & Goodman, M. J. (1996). The role of driver inattention in crashes. In Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine 40th annual proceedings. Des Moines, Ill: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
38. White M.P., Eiser J.R., and Harris P.R. Risk perceptions of mobile phone use while driving. Risk Analysis 24 (2004) 323-334
39. Wickens C.D. The structure of attentional resources. In: Nickerson R. (Ed). Attention and performance VIII (1980), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 239-257