Feature integration without visual attention: Evidence from the correlated flankers task

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 385-389

  Mordkoff, J Toby ^a,b   Halterman, Rose ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 48049104398     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.385     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BUNDESEN, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
2. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. (2000). Response selection processes for conjunctive targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 391-411.
3. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
4. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
5. GROSSBERG, S., MINGOLLA, E., & TODOROVIĆ , D. (1989). A neural network architecture for preattentive vision. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 36, 65-84.
6. HOLCOMBE, A. O., & CAVANAGH, P. (2001). Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 127-128.
7. HOUCK, M. R., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1986). Conjunction of color and form without attention: Evidence from an orientation-contingent color aftereffect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 186-199.
8. LI, Z. (2002). A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 9-16.
9. MILLER, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 419-434.
10. MOORE, C. M., & OSMAN, A. M. (1993). Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two? Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 381-390.
11. MORDKOFF, J. T. (1996). Selective attention and internal constraints: There is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 483-502). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. MORDKOFF, J. T., YANTIS, S., & EGETH, H. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 157-168.
13. NAKAYAMA, K., & SILVERMAN, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
14. PASHLER, H. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 191-201.
15. QUINLAN, P. T. (2003). Visual feature integration theory: Past, present, and future. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 643-673.
16. TREISMAN, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
17. TREISMAN, A., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
18. WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.