Object continuity and the transsaccadic representation of form

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 667-679

  Gordon, Robert D ^a   Vollmer, Sarah D ^a   Frankl, Megan L ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT;

FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SACCADES;

EID: 48049100582     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.4.667     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANGELONE, B. L., LEVIN, D. T., & SIMONS, D. J. (2003). The roles of representation and comparison failures in change blindness. Perception, 32, 947-962.
2. ATKINS, J. E., FISER, J., & JACOBS, R. A. (2001). Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and nap-tic percepts. Vision Research, 41, 449-461.
3. CASTELHANO, M. S., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2005). Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1017-1040.
4. COOPER, L. A., SCHACTER, D. L., BALLESTEROS, S., & MOORE, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 43-57.
5. DROLL, J. A., HAVHOE, M. M., TRIESCH, J., & SULLIVAN, B. T. (2005). Task demands control acquisition and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1416-1438.
6. FELDMAN, J. A. (1985). Four frames suffice: A provisional model of vision and space. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 265-289.
7. GAJEWSKI, D. A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2005). The role of saccade targeting in the transsaccadic integration of object types and tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 820-830.
8. GERMEYS, F., DE GRAEF, P., & VERFAILLIE, K. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of saccade target and flanker objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 868-883.
9. GORDON, R. D., & IRWIN, D. E. (1996). What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1260-1277.
10. GORDON, R. D., & IRWIN, D. E. (2000). The role of physical and conceptual properties in preserving object continuity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 136-150.
11. GRIMES, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across sac-cades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vol. 2, pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. HENDERSON, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
13. HENDERSON, J. M., & ANES, M. D. (1994). Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 826-839.
14. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
15. HENDERSON, J. M., & SIEFERT, A. B. C. (2001). Types and tokens in transsaccadic object identification: Effects of spatial position and left-right orientation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 753-760.
16. HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 388-403.
17. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 113-136.
18. HOLLINGWORTH, A., WILLIAMS, C. C., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 761-768.
19. IRWIN, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420-456.
20. IRWIN, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 307-317.
21. IRWIN, D. E. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 94-100.
22. IRWIN, D. E., & ANDREWS, R. V. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 125-156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
23. IRWIN, D. E., & GORDON, R. D. (1998). Eye movements, attention, and transsaccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127-155.
24. IRWIN, D. E., & ZELINSKY, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882-895.
25. KAHNEMAN, D., & TREISMAN, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
27. MATIN, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899-917.
28. MCCONKIE, G. W., & RAYNER, K. (1976). Identifying the span of the effective stimulus in reading: Literature review and theories of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 137-162). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
29. MITROFF, S. R., SCHOLL, B. J., &WYNN, K. (2004). Divide and conquer: How object files adapt when a persisting object splits into two. Psychological Science, 15, 420-425.
30. MITROFF, S. R., SIMONS, D. J., & LEVIN, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281.
31. NOLES, N. S., SCHOLL, B. J., & MITROFF, S. R. (2005). The persistence of object file representations. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 324-334.
32. O'REGAN, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
33. RENSINK, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
34. RENSINK, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
35. RENSINK, R. A., O'REGAN, J. K., & CLARK, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
36. RICHARD, A. M., HOLLINGWORTH, A., & LUCK, S. J. (2006). Testing an object file theory of object correspondence across saccades [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6, 486a. Available at journalofvision.org/6/6/486/, doi:10.1167/6.6.486.
37. SIMONS, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.
38. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
39. TREISMAN, A., KAHNEMAN, D., & BURKELL, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
40. VERFAILLIE, K., & DE GRAEF, P. (2000). Transsaccadic memory for position and orientation of saccade source and target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1243-1259.
41. ZELINSKV, G. J. (2001). Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 209-225.
42. ZELINSKY, G. J. (2003). Detecting changes between real-world objects using spatiochromatic filters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 533-555.