Accepting disability: The parenting experience of fathers with spinal cord injury (SCI)

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1021-1033

  Duvdevany, Ilana ^a   Buchbinder, Eli ^a   Yaacov, Ilanit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Disability; Fathers; Parenthood; Parenting; Spinal cord injury; Transition to

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; PARAPLEGIA; PATERNAL ATTITUDE; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SOCIAL DISABILITY; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; CHILD; CHILD OF IMPAIRED PARENTS; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FATHER-CHILD RELATIONS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; ISRAEL; MALE; PUBLIC OPINION; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 48049092773     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732308318825     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 2(1), 5-19.
2. Abma, T. (2005). Patient participation in health research: Research with people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1310-1326.
3. Aldridge, J., & Wates, M. (2004). Young carers and their disabled parents: Moving the debates on. In T. Newman & M. Wates (Eds.), Disabled parents and their children: Building a better future. Ilford, UK: Barnardo's.
4. Alexander, C.J., Hwang, K., & Sipsky, M.L. (2002). Mothers with spinal cord injuries: Impact on marital, family, and children's adjustment. Archive of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 24-30.
5. Angen, M.J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 378-395.
6. Armistead, L., Klein, K., & Forehand, R. (1995). Parental physical illness and child functioning. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 409-422.
7. Banks, P., Cogan, N., Deeley, S., Hill, M., Riddell, S., & Tisdall, K. (2001). Seeing the invisible children and young people affected by disability. Disability & Society, 16, 797-814.
8. Barnes, C. (1996). Theories of disability and the origins of the oppression of disabled people in western society. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability & Society (pp. 43-60). New York: Longman.
9. Barnes, C., Mercer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
10. Brandt, E., & Pope, A. (1997). Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy.
11. Buck, F., & Hohman, G. (1981). Personality, behavior, values, and family relations of children of fathers with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 62, 432-438.
12. Buck, F., & Hohman, G. (1983). Parental disability and children's adjustment. In E. L. Pan, T. E. Backer, & C. L. Vash (Eds.), Annual review of rehabilitation (Vol. 3, pp. 203-241). New York: Springer.
13. Burr, V. (1996). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
14. Chirban, J.T. (1996). Interviewing in depth: The interactive-relational approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Conley-Jung, C., & Olkin, R. (2001). Visual impairments or blindness raising young children. Journal of Visual Impairments and Blindness, 91(1), 14-29.
16. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Crow, L. (1996). Including all of our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. In J. Morris (Ed.), Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability (pp. 206-226). London: Women's Press.
18. Denney, D. (1998). Social policy and social work. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
19. Duvdevany, I., Yahav, R., & Moin, V. (2005). Children's feelings toward parents in the context of parental disability. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 28, 259-262.
20. Farber, R.S. (2000). Mothers with disabilities: In their own voice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 260-268.
21. French, S. (1996). The attitudes of health professionals towards disabled people. In G. Hales (Ed.), Beyond disability (pp. 151-162). London: Sage.
22. Gilson, S.F., Bricourt, J.C., & Baskind, F.R. (1998). Listening to the voices of individuals with disabilities. Families in Society, 79(2), 188-196.
23. Greer, B.G. (1985). Children of physically disabled parents: Some thoughts, facts, and hypotheses. In S. K. Thurman (Ed.), Children of handicapped parents: Research and clinical perspectives (pp. 131-144). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24. Keith, L. (1992). Who cares who wins? Women, caring and disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 167-175.
25. Keith, L., & Morris, J. (1996). Easy targets: A disability rights perspective on the "children as carers" debate. In J. Morris (Ed.), Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability (pp. 89-115). London: Women's Press.
26. Kelley, S.D.M., Sikka, A., & Venkatesan, S. (1997). A review of research on parental disability: Implications for research and counseling practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41(2), 105-121.
27. Kirshbaum, M. (1988). Parents with physical disabilities and their babies. Zero to Three, 8, 8-15.
28. Korneluk, Y.G., & Lee, C.M. (2000). Children's adjustment to parental physical illness. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(3), 179-193.
29. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. LeCompte, M.D., & Preissle, J. (1994). Qualitative research: What it is, what it isn't, and how it's done. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 3, pp. 141-163). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
31. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. Martz, E. (2004). A philosophical perspective to confront disability stigmatization and promote adaptation to disability. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 9, 139-158.
34. Maxwell, J.A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide. London: Falmer.
36. Meadow-Orlans, K.P. (2002). Parenting with a sensory or physical disability. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (2 nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 259-293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Morris, J. (1996). Introduction. In J. Morris (Ed.), Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability. London: Women's Press.
38. Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing an ethics on care that promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1-6.
39. Morse, J.M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Nagi, S. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.), Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309-327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Oliver, M. (1989). Disability and dependency: A creation of industrial societies. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and dependency (pp. 6-22). East Sussex, UK: Falmer.
43. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan Education.
44. Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability. London: Macmillan.
45. Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York: Guilford.
46. Olkin, R., Abrams, K., Preston, P., & Kirshbaum, M. (2006). Comparison of parents with and without disabilities raising teens: Information from the NHIS and two national surveys. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51(1), 43-49.
47. Olsen, R. (1996). Young carers: Challenging the facts and politics of research into children and caring. Disability & Society, 11, 41-54.
48. Olsen, R., & Parker, G. (1997). A response to Aldridge and Becker-"Disability rights and the denial of young carers: The dangers of zero-sum arguments." Critical Social Policy, 17, 125-132.
49. Padgett, D. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Prilleltensky, O. (2004). My child is not my carer: Mothers with physical disabilities and the well-being of children. Disability & Society, 19, 209-223.
52. Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Saleebey, D. (2002). The strengths perspective: Possibilities and problems. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (3 rd ed., pp. 264-286). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
54. Sapey, B. (2002). Disability. In N. Thompson (Ed.), Loss and grief (pp. 139-148). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave.
55. Shakespeare, T. (1994). Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins of disavowal ? Disability & Society, 9, 283-301.
56. Shkedi, A. (2005). Multiple case narrative. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Thomas, C. (1999a). Female forms. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
59. Thomas, C. (1999b). Narrative identity and the disabled self. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 47-55). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
60. Tregaskis, C. (2002). Social model theory: The story so far... Disability & Society, 17, 457-470.
61. Tregaskis, C. (2004). Constructions of disability: Researching the interface between disabled and non-disabled people. London: Routledge.
62. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experiences. London: Althouse Press.
63. Wolfesenberger, W. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21, 234-239.
64. Wolfesenberger, W. (2000). A brief overview of social role valorization. Mental Retardation, 38, 102-128.
65. Wolfesenberger, W., Nirje, B., Olshansky, S., & Roos, P. (Eds.). (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute of Mental Retardation.
66. World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability, and health: ICF. Retrieved August 8, 2003, from http://www.3.who.int/icf/beginners/bj.pdf