Scenario-based application requirements engineering

Software Product Lines: Research Issues in Engineering and Management

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 161-194

  Bühne, Stan ^a   Halmans, Günter ^a   Lauenroth, Kim ^a   Pohl, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48049085565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Atkinson, C., Bayer, J., Bunse, C., Kamsties, E., Laitenberger, O., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Paech, B., Wüst, J., Zettel, J.: Component-Based Product-Line Engineering with UML (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2002)
2. Bachmann, F., Goedicke, M., Leite, J., Nord, R., Pohl, K., Ramesh, B., Vilbig, A.: An International. WoMeta-Model for Representing Variability in Product Family Development, In: 5th International Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-5), Siena, Italy, 2003, pp 66-80
3. Ben Achour, C. et al: Bridging the gap between users and requirements engineering: the scenario-based approach. Int. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 14(6), 379-405 (1999)
4. Beuche, D.: Composition and construction of embedded software families. PhD thesis (University of Marburg, Magdeburg, Germany 2003)
5. Böckle, G., Wittmann, M.: Catalogue of methods and processes for system-family engineering, Official Web site of the FAMILIES project. http://www.esi.es/Families/E1.4b-Method-Catalogue/Start-SFE-Catalogue.htm. Cited 8 Aug. 2005
6. Bühne, S., Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K.: Why is it not sufficient to model requirements variability with feature models? In: Proceedings of Workshop: Automotive Requirements Engineering (AURE04), co-located at RE04, Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan, 2004, pp 5-12
7. Bühne, S., Halmans, G., Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K.: An extended and partially validated method to identify customer specific requirements for product family based applications, FAMILIES project, deliverable for task E2.2.2 (June 2004)
8. Bühne, S., Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K.: Modeling requirements variability across product lines. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Paris, France, ed by Atlee, J. M. (IEEE, New York 2005) pp 41-50
9. Carroll, J.: Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions (MIT, Cambridge, MA 2000)
10. Cerón, R., Dueñas, J. C., Serrano, E., Capilla, R.: A meta-model for requirements engineering in system family context for software process improvement using CMMI. In: 6th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Oulu, Finland, 13-18 June 2005, ed by Frank, B., Seija, K. S. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3547 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2005)
11. Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines - Practices and Patterns. Series in Software Engineering (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2001)
12. Deelstra, S., Sinnemaand, M., Bosch, J.: Experiences in software product families: problems and issues during product derivation. In: Software Product Lines, ed by Nord, R. L., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference (SPLC 2004), Boston, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3154 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2004) pp 165-182
13. Dorfman, M., Thayer, R. H.: Software Requirements Engineering (IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring, MD 1977)
14. International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for System Families: Position papers, ed by Dueñas, J. C., Schmid, K., allocated with ICSR8, July 2004, Madrid. Technical report (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid 2004)
15. Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M.: A framework for multi-valued reasoning over inconsistent viewpoints. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering 2001 (ICSE 2001), 2001, pp 411-420
16. Faulk, S. R.: Product-line requirements specification (PRS): an approach and case study. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, Canada (IEEE, New York 2001) pp 48-55
17. Halmans, G., Pohl, K.: Considering product line assets when defining customer requirements. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Product line Engineering: The Early Steps: Planning, Modeling, and Managing (PLEES'01), Erfurt, Germany, 2001, pp 37-42
18. Halmans, G., Pohl, K.: Communicating the variability of a software-product line to customers. J. Softw. Syst. Model. (SoSyM) 2:15-36 (2003)
19. Hotz, L., Krebs, T.: Supporting the product derivation process with a knowledge-based approach. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Variability Management (SVM), co-located at ICSE 03, Portland, USA, 2003, pp 24-29
20. Hotz, L., Günter, A., Krebs, T.: A knowledge-based product derivation process and some ideas how to integrate product development. In: Proceedings of the Software Variability Management Workshop, Groningen, Netherlands, 2003, ed by Vangurp, J., Bosch, J., pp 136-14
21. IEEE: IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications, IEEE Standard 830-1998 (The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York 1998)
22. John, I., Muthig, D.: Tailoring use cases for product line modelling. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines 2002 (REPL'02), 2002, pp 26-32
23. Kang, K., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., Huh, M.: FORM: a feature-oriented reuse method with domainspecific reference architectures. Ann. Softw. Eng. 5:143-168 (1998)
24. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.: Attractive quality and must be quality. In: The Best on Quality, ed by Hromi, J. D., vol 7 (ASQ Quality, Milwaukee, WI 1996)
25. Karlsson, E. A.: Software Reuse - A Holistic Approach (Wiley, New York 1995)
26. Lam, W.: A case-study of requirements reuse through product families. Ann. Softw. Eng. 5:253-277 (1998)
27. Lee, K., Kang, K. C., Koh, E., Chae, W., Kim, B., Choi, B. W.: Domain-oriented engineering of elevator control software. In: Software Product Lines, Experience and Research Directions, ed by Donohoe, P., Proceedings of the First Software Product Line Conference (SPLC1), Denver, Colorado, vol 576 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2000) pp 3-22
28. Mannion, M., Kaindl, H., Wheadon, J., Keepence, B.: Reusing single system requirements from application family requirements. In Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 16-22 May 1999, ICSE (IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring, MD) pp 453-462
29. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., Van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2005)
30. Pohl, K.: Process-Centered Requirements Engineering (Research Studies Press, Wiley, New York 1996)
31. Project Website of the DFG project VarMod-PRIME: variability modeling in process integrated modeling environments. http://www.sse.uni-essen. de/wms/en/index.php?go=139
32. Schmid, K., John, I.: Generic variability management and its application to product line modeling. In: Proceedings of the Software Variability Management Workshop, Groningen, Netherlands, ed by Van Gurp, J. Bosch, J., pp 13-18
33. Sommerville, I., Sawyer, P.: Requirements Engineering - A Good Practice Guide (Wiley, New York 2000)
34. Van der Linden, F.: Software product lines in Europe: the ESAPS & CAFÉ projects. IEEE Softw. 19(4), 41-49 (July/August 2002)
35. Weiss, D. M., Lai, C. T. R.: Software Product-Line Engineering, A Family-Based Software Development Process (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA 1999)
36. Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl, K., Jarke, M., Haumer, P.: Scenario usage in system development: a report on current practice. IEEE Softw. 15(2), 34-45 (1998)
37. Wolter, K., Krebs, T., Hotz, L., Meijler, T. D.: Knowledge-based product derivation process. In: Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, ed by Bramer, M., Devedzic, V., IFIP 18th World Computer Congress, TC12 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations (AIAI-2004) (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2004) pp 323-332