The family photographic condition

Visual Anthropology Review

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 2-19

  Bouquet, Mary ^a  

^a ROYAL TROPICAL INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949129589     PISSN: 10587187     EISSN: 15487458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/var.2000.16.1.2     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Bennett. T. 1995. The Birth of the Museum. History. theory. politics London and New York: Routledge
2. Blankert. A. 1987. Vermeer's work. In Vermeer. Blankert. A., M. Montias Meulenhoff/Landshoff and G. Aillaud (eds). New York: Meulenhoff/Landshoff. pp. 69-169
3. Bouquet. M. 1996. Family trees and their affinities: the visual genealogical diagram imperative of the genealogical diagram. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 2: 43-66
4. 2000. Intimiteit. identiteit en fotografische verbeelding. Jaarboek 2000 Nijmegen/Arnhem: SUN/NOM Nederlands Openluchtmuseum/ Yearbook 2 000 Netherlands Open Air Museum. Nijmegen/Arnhem: SUN/NOM. pp. 28-57
5. 2001. Making kinship with an old reproductive technology. In S. Franklin Press and S. McKinnon (eds). Relative Values. Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham. North Carolina: Duke University Press
6. Bourdieu. P. 1965. Un art moyen: essai sur la photographic Paris Editions de Minuit
7. Duncan. C. 1995. Civilizing Rituals. Inside Public Art Museums. London and New York: Routledge
8. Feeley-Harnik. G. 1999. 'Communities of blood." The natural history century America of kinship in nineteenth century America. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 41: 215-262
9. Foucault. M. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences London. Tavistock
10. Gombrich. E.H. 1989. The Story of Art. London: Phaidon
11. Hirsch. M. 1997. Family Frames, Photography, Narrative and Postmemory Cambridge. Mass. and London. England: Harvard University Press
12. Howell, S. n.d. The kinning of selves: creating life trajectories in adoptive families, (paper presented at Kinship and Temporality Workshop, Goldsmiths College. London 16-18 Dec. 1999)
13. Jong. E. de and M. Dominicus van Soest 1999. Aardse Paradijzen. De tuin in de Nederlandse kunst 1770 tot 2000. Gent: Snoeck-Duraju en Zoon
14. de eeuw. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff
15. Monti as. J. 1987 Chronicle of a Delft family. In Vermeer. A. Blankert Meulenhoff/Landshoff M. Montias and G. Aillaud (eds) New York: Meulenhoff/Landshoff. pp. 15-66
16. Porto. N. 1999 Picturing the museum: photography and the work of Portuguese Empire. Focaal. Tijdschrift voor Antropologie mediation in the Third Portuguese Empire. Focaal. Tijdschrift voor Antropologie. 34: 41-57
17. Ripert. A. and C. Frere-Michelat 1976. Images corporelles de la triade magazine Parent familiale: le discours photographique du magazine Parent. Ethnographie Française (Langages et images du corps) 3-4: 265-278
18. Ryan. J.R. 1977. Picturing Empire. Photography and the Visualization of the British Empire. London: Reaktion Books
19. Sayre. H.M. 1989. The Object of Performance. The American Avant-Garde since 1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
20. Scharma. S. 1987. The Embarrassment of Riches. An interpretation of Dutch Golden Age culture in the Golden Age. GB and USA: Fontana
21. Snoeijen. M. 1997 De laatste-kansouders. N.R.C. Handelsblad (31 May) Zaterdagbijlage. I
22. Sontag. S. 1977 |1973). On Photography. Harmondsworth: Penguin
23. Staring. A. 1956. De Hollanders Thuis.Gezelschapstukken uit drie eeuwen S-Gravenhage: Nijhoff
24. Verlichak. V. 1999. Quien es Julio Galan? http://www.proa.org.ar/ exhibicion/galan/quien-galan.html