Southern African AIDS Trust: An evaluation of the process and outcomes of community-based Partner graduation

Canadian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 99, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Simon, Lisa D ^a,b   Ismail, Hamida ^c  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Southern African AIDS Trust (SAT)

Author keywords

Africa; Evaluation studies; HIV; Organizations; Southern; World health

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949129522     PISSN: 00084263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03403795     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gardner A, Greenblott K, Joubert E. What We Know About Exit Strategies: Practical Guidance for Developing Exit Strategies in the Field. Consortium for Southern Africa Food Security Emergency (C-SAFE), 2005.
2. Rogers BL, Macias KE. Program Graduation and Exit Strategies: Title II Program Experiences and Related Research. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA), Academy for Educational Development (AED), 2004.
3. Swedish International Development Co-operation Agency (Sida), Department for Evaluation and Internal Audit. Exit Strategies - A Concept Note for a Joint Evaluation. Sida, 2005.
4. Hopps M. USAID Graduation: Sharpening the Policy on When and How to End Assistance. USAID Evaluation Highlights No. 65. Washington, DC: Center for Development Information and Evaluation, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), 1999.
5. World Food Programme (WFP). Exiting Emergencies: Programme Options for Transition from Emergency Response. WFP, 2004.
6. Southern African AIDS Trust. Overview of SAT Partnership Process. (Internal document)
7. Southern African AIDS Trust. Who is a SAT "Partner"? (Internal document)
8. Southern African AIDS Trust. SAT M&E Tools. (Internal document)
9. Southern African AIDS Trust. SAT Partner Monitoring Guidelines. (Internal document)
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR 1999;48 (No. RR-11):1-40.
11. Patton MQ. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1997.
12. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2002.
13. Crabtree BF, Miller WL (Eds.). Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., 1999.
14. Hope RA. Water, workfare and poverty: The impact of the Working for Water programme on rural poverty reduction. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2006;8:139-56.
15. Cromer C, Pandit T, Robertson J, Niewijk A. The Family Planning Graduation Experience: Lessons for the Future. Washington, DC: The Population Technical Assistance Project (POPTECH), 2004.
16. Maxwell D. Programmes in chronically vulnerable areas: Challenges and lessons learned. Disasters 1999;23(4):373-84.
17. Low W, Davenport E. NGO capacity building and sustainability in the Pacific. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 2002;43(3):367-79.