Free word order, (non)configurationality, and phases

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 441-475

  Kiss, Katalin É ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Anaphora; Free word order; Phase; Principle C; Quantifier scope; Weak crossover

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949114034     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/ling.2008.39.3.441     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Barss, Andrew, and Howard Lasnik. 1986. A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17:347-354.
2. Bartos, Huba. 2000. Az inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere. In Magyar strukturális nyelvtan. Vol. 3, Morfológia, ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, 653-762. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
3. Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.
4. Bene, Annamária. 2005. Az igék bennható/ tranzitív/mediális felosztásának morfoszintaktikai következményei. Doctoral dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
5. Brody, Michael. 1990. Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. In UCL working papers in linguistics 2, ed. by John Harris, 201-225. London: University College London, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics.
6. Brody, Michael. 1995. Focus and checking theory. In Approaches to Hungarian 5, ed. by István Kenesei, 29-44. Szeged: JATE.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 3, Structures and beyond, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 45-127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 2005. On phases. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
11. Csirmaz, Anikó. 2004. Particles and phonologically defective predicates. In Verb clusters: A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch, ed. by Katalin É. Kiss and Henk van Riemsdijk, 225-252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Csirmaz, Anikó. 2006. Aspect marking in a two-component theory of aspect. In Event structure and the left periphery: Studies on Hungarian, ed. by Katalin É. Kiss, 107-128. Dordrecht: Springer.
13. Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. Bare nominals: Non-specific and contrastive readings under scrambling. In Word order and scrambling, ed. by Simin Karimi, 67-90. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Dikken, Marcel den. 2007. Phase extension: Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33:1-41.
16. Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2005. Sound patterns of syntax: Object shift. Theoretical Linguistics 31:47-95.
18. Frey, Werner, and Karin Pittner. 1998. Zur Positionierung der Adverbiale im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte 176:489-534.
19. Gallego, Ángel, and Juan Uriagereka. 2006. Sub-extraction from subjects. Ms., Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and University of Maryland, College Park.
20. Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2000. Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
21. Holmberg, Anders. 1985. Icelandic word order and binary branching. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8:161-195.
22. Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University.
23. Karimi, Simin. 2003. On object positions, specificity, and scrambling in Persian. In Word order and scrambling, ed. by Simin Karimi, 91-124. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. É. Kiss, Katalin. 1991a. Logical structure in syntactic structure: The case of Hungarian. In Logical structure and linguistic structure, ed. by C.-T. James Huang and Robert May, 111-148. Dordrecht: Reidel.
25. É. Kiss, Katalin. 1991b. On the locality condition of anaphora and pronominal variable binding. In Longdistance anaphora, ed. by Jan Koster and Eric Reuland, 245-261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. É. Kiss, Katalin. 1994. Sentence structure and word order. In The syntactic structure of Hungarian, ed. by Ferenc Kiefer and Katalin É. Kiss, 1-90. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Multiple topic, one focus? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45:3-29.
28. É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. É. Kiss, Katalin. 2005. The structure of the Hungarian VP revisited. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian, Veszprém. To appear in Approaches to Hungarian 10.
30. É. Kiss, Katalin. 2006a. Focussing as predication. In Architecture of focus, ed. by Valéria Molnár and Susanne Winkler, 169-196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
31. É. Kiss, Katalin. 2006b. The function and the syntax of the verbal particle. In Event structure and the left periphery: Studies on Hungarian, ed. by Katalin É. Kiss, 17-56. Dordrecht: Springer.
32. É. Kiss, Katalin. To appear. Substitution or adjunction? Quantifiers and adverbials in the Hungarian sentence. Lingua.
33. Koopman, Hilda, and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Koster, Jan. 1994. Predicate incorporation and the word order of Dutch. In Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, and Raffaella Zanuttini, 255-276. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
35. Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
36. Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19:335-391.
37. Larson, Richard. 2004. Sentence-final adverbs and "scope." In North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 34, ed. by Keir Moulton and Matthew Wolf, 23-43. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
38. Marácz, László. 1989. Asymmetries in Hungarian. Doctoral dissertation, Groningen University.
39. Marušič, Franc. 2005. On non-simultaneous phases. Doctoral dissertation, University of New York at Stony Brook.
40. Neeleman, Ad. 1994. Scrambling is a D-Structure phenomenon. In Studies on scrambling, ed. by Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdijk, 387-430. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
41. Olsvay, Csaba. 2000a. Formális jegyek egyeztetése a magyar nemsemleges mondatokban. In A mai magyar nyelv leírásá nak újabb módszerei IV, ed. by László Büky and Márta Maleczki, 119-151. Szeged: Szeged University.
42. Olsvay, Csaba. 2000b. Negative quantifiers in the Hungarian sentence. Master's thesis, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
43. Olsvay, Csaba. 2004. The Hungarian verbal complex: An alternative approach. In Verb clusters: A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch, ed. by Katalin É. Kiss and Henk van Riemsdijk, 291-333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Piñón, Christopher. 1992. Heads in the focus field. In Approaches to Hungarian 4, ed. by István Kenesei and Csaba Pléh, 99-122. Szeged: JATE.
45. Platzack, Christer. 1986. COMP, INFL, and Germanic word order. In Topics in Scandinavian syntax, ed. by Lars Hellan and Kirsti Koch Christensen, 185-234. Dordrecht: Reidel.
46. Puskás, Genovéva. 2000. Word order in Hungarian: The syntax of A′ positions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
48. Sauerland, Uli, and Paul Elbourne. 2002. Total reconstruction, PF movement, and derivational order. Linguistic Inquiry 33:283-319.
49. Surányi, Balázs. 1999. Operator and head movement in Hungarian: From checking to marking. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium of Doctoral Students in Linguistics, 35-45. Budapest: ELTE/MTA (Research Institute for Linguistics/Hungarian Academy of Sciences).
50. Surányi, Balázs. 2002. Multiple operator movement in Hungarian. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.
51. Surányi, Balázs. 2004. The left periphery and cyclic Spellout: The case of Hungarian. In Peripheries and their effects, ed. by David Adger, Cécile de Cat, and George Tsoulas, 49-73. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
52. Surányi, Balázs. 2006a. Hungarian as a Japanese-type scrambling language. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 36, ed. by Chris Davis, Amy Rose, and Youri Zabbal, 2:561-574. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
53. Surányi, Balázs. 2006b. Scrambling in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 53:393-432.
54. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997. Strategies of scope taking. In Ways of scope taking, ed. by Anna Szabolcsi, 109-155. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
55. Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1986. On auxiliaries, AUX and VPs in Icelandic. In Topics in Scandinavian syntax, ed. by Lars Hellan and Kirsti Koch Christensen, 235-265. Dordrecht: Reidel.
56. Varga, László. 1981. A topicról és a fókusz utáni elemek sorrendjérocombining double acute accentl. Magyar Nyelv 77:198-200.
57. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1994. Dutch is head-initial. The Linguistic Review 11:377-406.