Building software cost estimation models using homogenous data

Proceedings - 1st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 393-400

  Premraj, Rahul ^a   Zimmermann, Thomas ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY;

BUSINESS SECTORS; COST MODELS; EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; HETEROGENOUS DATA; INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM; PREDICTION ACCURACY; SOFTWARE COST ESTIMATIONS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 47949104980     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. STTF - http://www.sttf.fi.
2. R. D. Banker, H. Chang, and C. F. Kemerer, Evidence on economies of scale in software development. Information and Software Technology, 36(5):275-282, 1994.
3. L. C. Briand, K. E. Emam, D. Surmann, I. Wieczorek, and K. Maxwell. An assessment and comparison of common software cost estimation modeling techniques. In ICSE 1999, pages 313-322, Los Angeles, May 1999. ACM.
4. L. C. Briand, T. Langley, and I. Wieczorek. A replicated assessment of common software cost estimation techniques. In ICSE 2000, pages 377-386, Limerick, June 2000. ACM.
5. T. Foss, E. Stensrud, B. Kitchenham, and I. Myrveit. A simulation study of the model evaluation criterion mmre. IEEE Trans. on Softw. Engg., 29(11):985-995, Nov. 2003.
6. R. Jeffery, M. Ruhe, and I. Wieczorek. A comparative study of two software development cost modeling techniques using multi-organizational and company-specific data. Info. and Softw. Technology, 42(14):1009-1016, Nov. 2000.
7. R. Jeffery, M. Ruhe, and I. Wieczorek. Using public domain metrics to estimate software development effort. In METRICS 2001, page 16, London, Apr. 2001. IEEE.
8. B. Kitchenham and E. Mendes. A comparison of cross-company and within-company effort estimation models for web applications. In EASE 2004, pages 47-55, Edinburgh, May 2004.
9. B. Kitchenham, E. Mendes, and G. H. Travassos. A systematic review of cross- vs. within-company cost estimation studies. In EASE 2006, Keele, Apr. 2006.
10. M. Lefley and M. Shepperd. Using genetic programming to improve software estimation based on general datasets. In Procs. of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), pages 2477-2487. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
11. K. Maxwell and P. Forselius. Benchmarking software development productivity. IEEE Software, 17(1):80-88, Jan./Feb. 2000.
12. K. Maxwell, L. V. Wassenhove, and S. Dutta. Performance evaluation of general and company specific models in software development effort estimation. Mgmt. Science, 45(6):787-803, June 1999.
13. E. Mendes and B. Kitchenham. Further comparison of cross-company and within-company effort estimation models for web applications. In METRICS 2004, pages 348-357, Chicago, Sept. 2004. IEEE.
14. E. Mendes, C. Lokan, R. Harrison, and C. Triggs. A replicated comparison of cross-company and within-company effort estimation models using the isbsg database. In METRICS 2005, page 36, Como, Sept. 2005. IEEE.
15. R. Premraj, M. Shepperd, B. Kitchenham, and P. Forselius. An empirical analysis of software productivity over time. In METRICS 2005, page 37, Como, Sept. 2005, IEEE.
16. M. Shepperd and C. Schofield. Estimating software project effort using analogies, IEEE Trans. on Softw. Engg., 23(11):736-743, 1997.
17. I. Wieczorek and M. Ruhe. How valuable is company-specific data compared to multi-company data for software cost estimation? In METRICS 2002, page 237, Ottawa, June 2002. IEEE.