Is there any clinical parameter able to predict prostate cancer after initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation?

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-35

  Mearini, Luigi ^a   Costantini, Elisabetta ^a   Bellezza, Guido ^a   Cavaliere, Antonio ^a   Zucchi, Alessandro ^a   Bini, Vittorio ^a   Porena, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Atypical small acinar proliferation; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CELL PROLIFERATION; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 47949097842     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000137637     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Iczkowski KA, Bostwick DG: Criteria for biopsy diagnosis of minimal volume prostatic adenocarcinoma: analytic comparison with nondiagnostic but suspicious atypical small acinar proliferation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:98-107.
2. Bostwick DG, Qian J, Frankel K: The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate needle biopsies. J Urol 1995;154:1791-1794.
3. Cheville JC, Reznicek MJ, Bostwick DG: The focus of 'atypical glands suspicious for malignancy' in prostate needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features and clinical follow-up of cases diagnosed in a community practice. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:633-640.
4. Khan W, Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Vanlue C, Crissman JD: Analysis of 3,300 consecutive prostate biopsies: a 4-year institutional experience with the frequency of carcinoma, isolate high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical (abstract). Mod Pathol 1997;10:79.
5. Orozco R, O'Dowd G, Kunnel B, Miller MC, Veltri RW: Observations on pathology trends in 62,537 prostate biopsies obtained from urology private practice in the United States. Urology 1998;51:186-195.
6. Cheville JC, Reznicek MJ, Bostwick DG: The focus of 'atypical glands suspicious for malignancy' in prostate needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features and clinical follow-up of cases diagnosed in a community practice. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:633-640.
7. Iczkowski KA, MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG: Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1489-1495.
8. Renshaw AA, Santis WF, Richie JP: Clinicopathologic characteristics of prostatic adenocarcinoma in men with atypical prostate needle biopsies. J Urol 1998;159:2018-2022.
9. Iczkowski KA, Bassler T, Schwob VS, et al: Diagnosis of 'suspicious for malignancy' in prostate biopsies: predictive value for cancer. Urology 1998;51:749-758.
10. Moore CK, Karikehalli S, Nazeer T, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Mian BM: Prognostic significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173:70-72.
11. Mian BM, Naya Y, Okihara K, Vakar-Lopez F, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ: Predictors of cancer in repeat extended multisite prostate biopsy in men with previous negative extended multisite biopsy. Urology 2002;60:836-840.
12. Borboroglu PG, Sur RL, Roberts JL, Amling CL: Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy. J Urol 2001;166:866-870.
13. Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Freschi M, Briganti A, Fantini GM, Bertini R, Salonia A, Montorsi F, Rigatti P: Predictors of prostate cancer after initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation at 10-12 core biopsies. Urology 2005;66:1043-1047.
14. Epstein JI, Herawi M: Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 2006;175:820-834.
15. Brausi M, Castagnetti G, Dotti A, De Luca G, Olmi R, Cesinaro AM: Immediate radical prostatectomy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. Over treatment? J Urol 2004;172:906-908.
16. European Urology Association Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Update March 2007.
17. Montironi R, Scattoni V, Mazzucchelli R, Lopez-Beltran A, Bostwich DG, Montorsi F: Atypical foci suspicious but not diagnostic of malignancy in prostate needle biopsies (also referred to as 'atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy'). Eur Urol 2006;50:666-674.
18. Chan TY, Epstein JI: Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer. Urology 1999;53:351-355.
19. Iczkowski KA, MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG: Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1489-1495.
20. Girasole CR, Cookson MS, Putzi MJ, Chang SS, Smith JA, Wells N, Oppenhiemier JR, Shappell SB: Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006;175:929-933.
21. Rubin MA, Zhous M, Dhanasekaran SM, Varambally S, Barrette TR, Sanda MG, Pienta KJ, Ghosh D, Chinnaiyan AM: Alphamethylacyl coenzyme a racemase as a tissue biomarker for prostate cancer. JAMA 2002;287:1662-1670.
22. Descazeaud A, Rubin MA, Allory Y, Burchardt M, Salomon L, Chopin D, Abbou C, de la Taille A: What information are urologists extracting from prostate needle biopsy reports and what do they need for clinical management of prostate cancer? Eur Urol 2005;48:911-915.
23. Iczkowski KA, Bassler TJ, Schwob VS, Bassler IC, Kunnel BS, Orozco RE, Bostwick DG: Diagnosis of 'suspicious for malignancy' in prostate biopsies: predictive value for cancer. Urology 1998;51:749-758.
24. Moore CK, Karikehalli S, Nazeer T, Fisher HAG, Kaufman RP, Mian BM: Prognostic significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173:70-72.
25. O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Orozco R, Veltri RW: Analysis of repeated biopsy results within one year after a non-cancer diagnosis. Urology 2000;55:553-559.
26. Ficarra V, Novella G, Novara G, Galfano A, Pea M, Martignoni G, Artibani W: The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2005;48:932-937.
27. Flury SC, Galgano MT, Mills SE, Smolkin ME, Theodorescu D: Atypical small acinar proliferation: biopsy artefact or distinct pathological entity? BJU Int 2007;99:780-785.