Informed consent and the birth plan

Practising Midwife

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 17-18

  Wier, Jacqueline ^a  

^a CANTERBURY CHRIST CHURCH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MATERNAL WELFARE; METHODOLOGY; MIDWIFE; MOTHER; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SHORT SURVEY;

ADULT; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MATERNAL WELFARE; MIDWIFERY; MOTHERS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY;

EID: 47949094397     PISSN: 14613123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (6)

1. Chester v. Afshar (2005). 1AC 134 at para 14.
2. Perez P G (2005). 'Birth plans: are they really necessary?' Pro American Journal of Maternal/ Child Nursing, 30 (5): 288.
3. Savulescu J and Momeyer R W (1997). 'Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs?' Journal of Medical Ethics, 23: 282-288.
4. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital 105 NE 92 (NY, 1914).
5. Scott W E (1996). 'Ethics in obstetric anaesthesia'. Anaesthesia, 51: 717-718.
6. Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G and Curtis P (2002). 'Midwives in the middle: balance and vulnerability'. British Journal of Midwifery, 10 (10): 607-611.