Multi-agent ontology mapping with uncertainty on the semantic web

ICCP 2007 Proceedings IEEE 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 49-56

  Nagy, Miklos ^a   Motta, Enrico ^a   Vargas Vera, Maria ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENTS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; INFORMATION THEORY; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS;

BELIEF FUNCTIONS; DEMPSTER-SHAFER; INTELLIGENT COMPUTER; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; MULTI AGENT FRAMEWORKS; MULTI AGENTS; ONTOLOGY MAPPINGS; QUESTION ANSWERING; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 47749151469     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCP.2007.4352141     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Choi N.,Song I-Y., Han H.(2006). A survey on ontology mapping. SIGMOD Record 35(3): 34-41.
2. Vargas-Vera M., and Motta E. (2004). An Ontology-driven Similarity Algorithm. KMI-TR-151, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK.
3. Vargas-Vera M.,Motta E., and Domingue J. (2003). AQUA: An Ontology-Driven Question Answering System. AAAI Spring Symposium, New Directions in Question Answering, Stanford, USA.: AAAI Press.
4. Nagy M., Vargas-Vera M., and Motta E. (2005). Multi-agent Ontology Mapping Framework in the AQUA Question Answering System. the Fourth International Mexican Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAl-2005), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence LNAI 3789, Gelbukh, A de Albornoz and H. Terashima (Eds), pp. 70-79, Monterrey Mexico.
5. Monge A. E.,Elkan C. P. (1996). The field-matching problem: algorithm and applications. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portland, US.
6. Cohen W., Ravikumar P., and Fienberg S. (2003). A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks, In Proceedings of Information Integration on the Web (IIWeb 2003), Accapulco, Mexico.
7. Shafer G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.: Princeton University Press.
8. Smets Ph. (1988). Belief functions, In Non-Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning: Academic Press, pp. 253-286.
9. Zadeh L. (1986). A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination, AI Magazine 7, 85-90.
10. Ramchurn S. D., Huynh T. D., and Jennings N. R. (2004). Trust in multi-agent systems, The Knowledge Engineering Review, Volume 19: 1-25.
11. Hu W.,Cheng G.,Zheng D.,Zhong X.,Qu Y. (2006). The Results of Falcon-AO in the OAEI 2006 Campaign, In Proceedings of ISWC Ontology matching workshop, Athens, GA, USA.
12. Mao M.,Peng Y. (2006). PRIOR System: Results for OAEI 2006. In Proceedings of ISWC Ontology matching workshop, Athens, GA, USA.
13. Sentz K. (2002) Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory. PhD thesis, Systems Science and Industrial Engineering Department, Binghamton University,USA.
14. Pan R.,Ding Z., Yu Y., and Peng Y. (2005). A Bayesian Network Approach to Ontology Mapping, In Proceedings of the Fourth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2005), Galway, Ireland.
15. Doan A.,Madhavan J.,Domingos P., and Halevy A.(2004). Ontology Matching: A Machine Learning Approach. Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems, S. Staab and R. Studer (eds.), Springer-Velag, Invited paper. P397-416.
16. Mitra P.,Noy N., and Jaiswal A.R. (2004). OMEN: A Probabilistic Ontology Mapping Tool. In Workshop on Meaning Coordination and Negotiation at the Third International Conference on the Semantic Web (ISWC-2004). Hisroshima, Japan.