Molecular characterization of mulberry accessions in Turkey by AFLP markers

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 593-597

  Kafkas, Salih ^a   Özgen, Mustafa ^b   Doǧan, Yildiz ^a   Özcan, Burcu ^a   Ercişli, Sezai ^c   Serçe, Sedat ^d  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Capillary electrophoresis; Molecular markers; Morun nigra; Morus alba; Morus rubra

Indexed keywords

MORUS (PLANT); MORUS ALBA; MORUS NIGRA; MORUS RUBRA; MORUS(ANGIOSPERM);

EID: 47749149534     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.133.4.593     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Awasthi, A.K., G.M. Nagaraja, G.V. Naik, S. Kanginakudru, K. Thangavelu, and J. Nagaraju. 2004. Genetic diversity and relationships in mulberry (genus Morus) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker assays. BMC Genet. 15 Mar. 2008. 〈http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/5/1〉.
2. Bhattacharya, E., S.B. Dandin, and S.A. Ranade. 2005. Single primer amplification reaction methods reveal exotic and indigenous mulberry varieties are similarly diverse. J. Biosci. 30:669-677.
3. Botton, A., G. Barcaccia, S. Cappellozza, R. Da Tos, C. Bonghi, and A. Ramina. 2005. DNA fingerprinting sheds light on the origin of introduced mulberry (Morus spp.) accessions in Italy. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 52:181-192.
4. Doyle, J.J. and J.L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bul. 19:11-15.
5. Ercisli, S. 2004. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 51:419-435.
6. Ercisli, S. and E. Orhan. 2007. Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food Chem. 103:1380-1384.
7. Kafkas, S., H. Ozkan, and M. Sutyemez. 2005. DNA polymorphism and assessment of genetic relationships in walnut genotypes based on AFLP and SAMPL markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130:585-590.
8. Kar, P.K., P.P. Srivastava, A.K. Awasthi, and S.R. Urs. 2008. Genetic variability and association of ISSR markers with some biochemical traits in mulberry (Morus spp.) genetic resources available in India. Tree Genet. Genomes 4:75-83.
9. Koidzumi, G. 1917. Taxonomy and phytogeography of the genus Morus. Bul. Sericulture Expt. Station 3:1-12.
10. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:175-178.
11. Orhan, E., S. Ercisli, N. Yidirim, and G. Agar. 2007. Genetic variations among mulberry genotypes (Morus alba) as revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Plant Syst. Evol. 265:251-258.
12. Prevost, A. and M.J. Wilkinson. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:107-112.
13. Rohlf, F.J. 2004. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.11V. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.
14. Sharma, A., R. Sharma, and H. Machii. 2000. Assessment of genetic diversity in a Morus germplasm collection using fluorescence-based AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:1049-1055.
15. Smith, J.S.C., E.C.L. Chin, H. Shu, O.S. Smith, S.J. Wall, M.L. Senior, S.E. Mitchell, S. Kresovich, and J. Ziegle. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): Comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163-173.
16. Sneath, P.H.A. and R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
17. Swofford, D.L. 1998. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. Sineauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
18. Vijayan, K. 2004. Genetic relationships of Japanese and Indian mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Plant Syst. Evol. 243:221-232.
19. Vijayan, K. and S.N. Chatterjee. 2003. ISSR profiling of Indian cultivars of mulberry (Morrus spp.) and its relevance to breeding programs. Euphytica 131:53-63.
20. Vijayan, K., A.K. Awasthi, P.P. Srivastava, and B. Saratchandra. 2004a. Genetic analysis of Indian mulberry varieties through molecular markers. Hereditas 141:8-14.
21. Vijayan, K., P.K. Kar, A. Tikader, P.P. Srivastava, A.K. Awasthi, and B. Saratchandra. 2004b. Molecular evaluation of genetic variability in wild populations of mulberry (Morus serrata Roxb.). Plant Breed. 123:568-572.
22. Vijayan, K., P.P. Srivastava, and A.K. Awasthi. 2004c. Analysis of phylogenetic relationship among five mulberry (Morus) species using molecular markers. Genome 47:439-448.
23. Vijayan, K., A. Tikader, P.K. Kar, P.P. Srivastava, A.K. Awasthi, K. Thangavelu, and B. Saratchandra. 2006. Assessment of genetic relationships between wild and cultivated mulberry (Morus) species using PCR based markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 53:873-882.
24. Vos, P., L. Hogers, M. Bleeker, T. Van De Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
25. Wang, Z.W. and M. Yu. 2001. AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) analysis of genetic background of polyploid breeding materials of mulberry (Morus alba L.). Acta Sericologic Sinica 27:170-176.
26. Zhao, W.G., Z.H. Zhou, X.X. Miao, S.B. Wang, L. Zhang, Y.L. Pan, and Y.P. Huang. 2006. Genetic relatedness among cultivated and wild mulberry (Moraceae: Morus) as revealed by intersimple sequence repeat analysis in China. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 251-257.
27. Zhao, W.G., Z.H. Zhou, X.X. Miao, Y. Zhang, S.B. Wang, J.H. Huang, H. Xiang, Y.L. Pan, and Y.P. Huang. 2007a. A comparison of genetic variation among wild and cultivated Morus species (Moraceae: Morus) as revealed by ISSR and SSR markers. Biodivers. Conserv. 6:275-290.
28. Zhao, W., Y. Wang, T. Chen, G. Ra, X.M. Wang, J.L. Qi, Y.J. Pang, S.S. Wang, Z.H. Li, Y.P. Huang, Y. Pan, and Y.H. Yang. 2007b. Genetic structure of mulberry from different ecotypes revealed by ISSRs in China: An implications for conservation of local mulberry varieties. Scientia Hort. 115:47-55.