A novel method for transuterine identification of piglets

Laboratory Animals

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 331-337

  Birck, M M ^a   Iburg, T ^a   Schmidt, M ^a   Sangild, P T ^b   Hansen, A K ^a  

^a Faculty of Life Sciences   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Fetal intervention; Granulomatous inflammation; Histology; Microchip; Piglet

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; AZAPERONE; BUTORPHANOL; BUTORPHANOL TARTRATE; CLOPROSTENOL; FENTANYL; ISOBA; ISOFLURANE; KETAMINE; NARCOXYL; OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; TILETAMINE PLUS ZOLAZEPAM; XYLAZINE;

ABDOMEN; ABDOMINAL WALL; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EOSINOPHIL; EUTHANASIA; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS MONITORING; FOREIGN BODY; GESTATIONAL AGE; GRANULOMATOUS INFLAMMATION; HINDLIMB; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INDEX FINGER; LAPAROTOMY; LIVE BIRTH; MICROCHIP ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR ELECTRONICS; MYOMETRIUM; NEEDLE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PERINATAL PERIOD; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PIGLET; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RELIABILITY; SEDATION; SOW (SWINE); THIGH; THUMB;

ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; FEMALE; PREGNANCY; SPECIFIC PATHOGEN-FREE ORGANISMS; SWINE;

ANIMALIA; PIERIS BRASSICAE; SUS;

EID: 47749138562     PISSN: 00236772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/la.2007.007013     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson JM (1988) Inflammatory response to implants. American Society for Artificial Internal Organs Transactions 34, 101-7
2. Ball DJ, Argentieri G, Krause R, et al. (1991) Evaluation of a microchip implant system used for animal identification in rats. Laboratory Animal Science 41, 185-6
3. Bancroft JD, Cook HC (1996) Proteins and nucleic acids. In: Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques (Bancroft JD, Stevens A, eds). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 139-51
4. Boros DL (1978) Granulomatous inflammations. Progress in Allergy 24, 183-267
5. Bradbury P, Rae K (1996) Connective tissue and stains. In: Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques (Bancroft JD, Stevens A, eds). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 113-39
6. Burk RL, Eich DW (1995) Migrating microchip. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 206, 1838
7. Dewan PA, Ehall H, Edwards GA, Macgregor D (2000) The development of a pig model to study fetal vesico-ureteric reflux. British Journal of Urology International 86, 1054-7
8. Elcock LE, Stuart BP, Wahle BS, et al. (2001) Tumours in long-term rat studies associated with microchip animal identification devices. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology 52, 483-91
9. Gonlugur U, Gonlugur TE (2006) Non-allergic eosinophilic inflammation. Immunological Investigations 35, 29-45
10. Le Calvez S, Perron-Lepage M-F, Burnett R (2006) Subcutaneus microchip-associated tumours in B6C3F1 mice: a retrospective study to attempt to determine their histogenesis. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology 57, 255-65
11. Luna LG (1968) Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
12. McNally AK, Anderson JM (2003) Foreign body-type multinucleated giant cell formation is potently induced by α-tocopherol and prevented by the diacylglycerol kinase inhibitor R59022. American Journal of Pathology 163, 1147-56
13. Murasugi E, Koie H, Okano M, Watanabe T, Asano R (2003) Histological reactions to microchip implants in dogs. The Veterinary Record 153, 328-30
14. Nelson JM, Krummel TM, Haynes JH, et al. (1990) Operative techniques in the fetal rabbit. Journal of Investigative Surgery 3, 393-8
15. Pearse AGE (1985) Applied histochemistry of simple and glysolated proteins. In: Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied (Pearse AGE, ed). Vol. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 538-610
16. Rao GN, Edmondson J (1990) Tissue reaction to an implantable identification device in mice. Toxicologic Pathology 18, 412-16
17. Rothkötter HJ, Sowa E, Pabst R (2002) The pig as a model of developmental immunology. Human and Experimental Toxicology 21, 533-6
18. Rubin JP, Cober SR, Butler PEM, et al. (2001) Injection of allogeneic bone marrow cells into the portal vein of swine in utero. Journal of Surgical Research 95, 188-94
19. Sangild PT, Trahair JF, Loftager MK, Fowden AL (1999) Intestinal macromolecule absorption in the fetal pig after infusion of colostrum in utero. Pediatric Research 45, 595-602
20. Schmidt M, Sangild PT, Jacobsen H, Greve T (2004) A method to reduce the invasiveness of fetal catheterization in the cow. Animal Reproduction Science 80, 193-200
21. Swift S (2000) Microchip adverse reactions. Journal of Small Animal Practice 41, 232
22. Swift S (2002) Keeping track of microchip adverse reactions. Journal of Small Animal Practice 43, 570
23. Swindle MM, Wiest DB, Smith AC, et al. (1996) Fetal surgical protocols in Yucatan miniature pigs. Laboratory Animal Science 46, 90-5
24. Tang L, Jennings TA, Eaton JW (1998) Mast cells mediate acute inflammatory responses to implanted biomaterials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 95, 8841-6
25. Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Mandel L, Trebichavsky I, Kovaru F, Barot R, Sterzl J (1994) Development of immune responses in early pig ontogeny. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 43, 135-42
26. Trebichavsky I, Tlaskalova H, Cukrowska B, et al. (1996) Early ontogeny of immune cells and their functions in the fetal pig. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 54, 75-81
27. Vascellari M, Melchiotti E, Mutinelli F (2006) Fibrosarcoma with typical features of postinjection sarcoma at site of microchip implant in a dog: histologic and immunohistochemical study. Veterinary Pathology 43, 545-8