Research ethics and reporting standards at PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Yamey, Gavin ^a  

^a Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DATA BASE; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MEDICAL ETHICS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; REGISTER; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STANDARDIZATION; TROPICAL DISEASE; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

EID: 47749132314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000069     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. World Health Organization Research Ethics Review Committee (date unknown) The process of seeking informed consent. Available: http://www.who.int/rpc/research_ethics/Process_seeking_IF_printing.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2007.
2. Bethony J, Diernert D (2007) Obtaining valid informed consent in research with vulnerable populations. PLoS Neg Trop Dis. In press.
3. Laine C, Horton R, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. (2007) Clinical trial registration. JAMA 298: 93-94.
4. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, et al. (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet 354: 1896-1900.