LVQ acrosome integrity assessment of boar sperm cells

Proceedings of the International Symposium CompIMAGE 2006 - Computational Modelling of Objects Represented in Images: Fundamentals, Methods and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 337-342

  Petkov, Nicolai ^a   Alegre, Enrique ^b   Biehl, Michael ^a   Sánchez, Lidia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE RETRIEVAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VECTORS;

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATIONS; FEATURE VECTORS; GRADIENT MAGNITUDES; INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTS; LEARNING VECTOR QUANTIZATIONS; OPTICAL PHASE; SPERM CELLS; TEST ERRORS;

VECTOR QUANTIZATION;

EID: 47749129626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Beletti, M., L. Costa, and M. Viana (2005). A comparison of morphometric characteristics of sperm from fertile Bos taurus and Bos indicus bulls in Brazil. Animal Reproduction Science 85, 105-116.
2. Biehl, M., P. Pasma, M. Piji, L. Sanchez, and N. Petkov (2006). Classification of boar sperm head images using learning vector quantization. In M. Verleysen (Ed.), Proc. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN), Brugge, April 26-28, 2006, pp. 545-550. d-side, Evere, Belgium.
3. Canny, J. F. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 8(6), 679-698.
4. Grigorescu, C., N. Petkov, and M. A. Westenberg (2004). Contour and boundary detection improved by surround suppression of texture edges. Image and Vision Computing 22(8), 609-622.
5. Hammer, B. and T. Villmann (2002). Generalized relevance learning vector quantization. Neural Networks 15, 1059-1068.
6. Kohonen, T. (1995). Self-organizing maps. Springer, Berlin.
7. Linneberg, C., P. Salamon, C. Svarer, and L. Hansen (1994). Towards semen quality assessment using neural networks. In Proc. IEEE Neural Networks for Signal Processing IV, pp. 509-517.
8. Neural Networks Research Centre (2002). Bibliography on the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) and Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ). Helsinki University of Technology.
9. Ostermeier, G., G. Sargeant, T. Yandell, and J. Parrish (2001). Measurement of bovine sperm nuclear shape using Fourier harmonic amplitudes. J. Androl. 22, 584-594.
10. Otsu, N. (1979). A threshold selection method from graylevel histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 9, 62-66.
11. Quintero, A., T. Rigaub, and J. Rodríguez (2004). Regression analyses and motile sperm subpopulation structure study as improving tools in boar semen quality analysis. Theriogenology 61, 673-690.
12. Rijsselaere, T., A. V Soom, G. Hoflack, D. Maes, and A. de Kruif (2004). Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Theriogenology 62(1), 1292-1306.
13. Sánchez, L., N. Petkov, and E. Alegre (2005a). Classification of boar spermatozoid head images using a model intracellular density distribution. In M. Lazo and A. Sanfeliu (Eds.), Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and Applications: Proc. 10th Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition, CIARP 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3773, pp. 154-160. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
14. Sánchez, L., N. Petkov, and E. Alegre (2005b). Statistical approach to boar semen head classification based on intracellular intensity distribution. In A. Gagalowicz and W. Philips (Eds.), Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, CAIP 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3691, pp. 88-95. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
15. Sato, A. and K. Yamada (1995). Generalized learning vector quantization. In G. Tesauro, D. Touretzky, and T. Leen (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 7, pp. 423-429. MIT Press.
16. Schwartz, L. (1950). Théorie des Distributions. Vol. I, II of Actualités scientifiques et industrielle. L'Institute de Mathématique de l'Université de Strasbourg.
17. Suzuki, T., H. Shibahara, H. Tsunoda, Y. Hirano, A. Taneichi, H. Obara, S. Takamizawa, and I. Sato (2002). Comparison of the sperm quality analyzer IIC variables with the computeraided sperm analysis estimates. International Journal of Andrology 25, 49-54.
18. Tagare, H. and R. de Figueiredo (1990). On the localization performance measure and optimal edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12(12), 1186-1190.
19. Verstegen, J., M. Iguer-Ouada, and K. Onclin (2002). Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57, 149-179.