The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women

Climacteric

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 296-303

  Dane, C ^a,b   Dane, B ^a   Cetin, A ^a   Erginbas, M ^a  

^a HASEKI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Broadband ultrasound attenuation; DXA; Osteoporosis; Quantitative ultrasound; Speed of sound; Stiffness index

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPOROSIS; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINAL CORD; ULTRASOUND;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; DENSITOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREMENOPAUSE; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINE;

EID: 47749120267     PISSN: 13697137     EISSN: 14730804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13697130802178471     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Consensus development conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993;94:646-50
2. Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis: the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:390-406
3. Fogelman I, Blake GM. Different approaches to bone densitometry. J Nucl Med 2000;41:2015-25
4. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:7-22
5. Zagzebski JA, Rossman PJ, Mesina C, Mazess RB, Madsen EL. Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49:107-11
6. Hans D, Arlot ME, Schott AM, Roux JP, Kotzki PO, Meunier PJ. Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass? A two dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 1995;16:295-300
7. Barkmann R, Laugier P, Moser U, et al. A method for the estimation of femoral bone mineral density from variables of ultrasound transmission through the human femur. Bone 2007;40:37-44
8. Gluer CC. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. The International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1280-88
9. Gluer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M, Goldstein SA, Genant HK. Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;55:46-52
10. Hans D, Wu C, Njeh CF, et al. Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity. Calcif Tissue Int 1999;64:18-23
11. Link TM, Majumdar S, Augat P, et al. In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:1175-82
12. Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, et al. Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:111-18
13. Gudmundsdottir SL, Indridason OS, Franzson L, Sigurdsson G. Age-related decline in bone mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound in a population-based sample of both sexes: identification of useful ultrasound thresholds for osteoporosis screening. J Clin Densitom 2005;8:80-6
14. Ensrud KE, Thompson DE, Cauley JA, et al. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:241-9
15. Eastell R. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:736-46
16. Diez-Perez A, Marin F, Vila J, et al. Evaluation of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in a primary care setting as a screening tool for osteoporosis in postmenopausal Women. J Clin Densitom 2003;6:237-45
17. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996;348:511-14
18. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:629-34
19. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, Fogelman I. Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 2004;15:367-4
20. Grabe DW, Cerulli J, Stroup JS, Kane MP. Comparison of the Achilles Express ultrasonometer with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:830-5
21. Yeap SS, Pearson D, Cawte SA, Hosking DJ. The relationship between bone mineral density and ultrasound in postmenopausal and osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int 1998;8:141-6
22. Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Jurvelin J, Saarikoski S, Alhava E. Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:190-5
23. Naganathan V, March L, Hunter D, Pocock NA, Markovey J, Sambrook PN. Quantitative heel ultrasound as a predictor for osteoporosis. Med J Aust 1999;171:297-300
24. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:441-9
25. Jorgensen HL, Warming L, Bjarnason NH, Andersen PB, Hassager C. How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories? Clin Physiol 2001;21:51-9
26. Dubois EF, van den Bergh JP, Smals AG, van de Meerendonk CW, Zwinderman AH, Schweitzer DH. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women. Neth J Med 2001;58:62-70
27. Rosenthall L, Tenenhouse A, Caminis J. A correlative study of ultrasound calcaneal and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements of the lumbar spine and femur in 1000 women. Eur J Nucl Med 1995;22:402-6
28. Meszaros S, Ferencz V, Csupor E, et al. Comparison of the femoral neck bone density, quantitative ultrasound and bone density of the heel between dominant and non-dominant side. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:293-8
29. Larijani B, Dabbaghmanesh MH, Aghakhani S, Sedaghat M, Hamidi Z, Rahimi E. Correlation of quantitative heel ultrasonography with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:941-6
30. Saadi HF, Reed RL, Carter AO, Al-Suhaili AR. Correlation of quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus with bone density of the spine and hip in women with prevalent hypovitaminosis D. J Clin Densitom 2004;7:313-8
31. Moris M, Peretz A, Tjeka R, Negaban N, Wouters M, Bergmann P. Quantitative ultrasound bone measurements: normal values and comparison with bone mineral density by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1995;57:6-10
32. Faulkner KG, McClung MR, Coleman LJ, Kingston-Sandahl E. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel: correlation with densitometric measurements at different skeletal sites. Osteoporosis Int 1994;4:42-7
33. Massie A, Reid DM, Porter RW. Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:107-10
34. Lippuner K, Fuchs G, Ruetsche AG, Perrelet R, Casez JP, Neto I. How well do radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound predict osteoporosis at spine or hip? A cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Densitom 2000;3:241-9
35. Cetin A, Erturk H, Celiker R, Sivri A, Hascelik Z. The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Rheumatol Int 2001;20:55-9
36. Hamanaka Y, Yamamoto I, Takada M, et al. Comparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 1999;17:195-200
37. Langton CM, Ballard PA, Bennett DK, Purdie DW. A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal ultrasound measurements with clinical criteria for bone densitometry (DEXA) referral. Clin Rheumatol 1997;16:117-18
38. Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Gourtsoyiannis N. Imaging ultrasonometry of the calcaneus: optimum T-score thresholds for the identification of osteoporotic subjects. Calcif Tissue Int 2001;68:219-24
39. Grampp S, Henk C, Lu Y, et al. Quantitative US of the calcaneus: cutoff levels for the distinction of healthy and osteoporotic individuals. Radiology 2001;220:400-5
40. Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Perisinakis K, et al. Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Radiol 2004;50:268-72
41. Hartl F, Tyndall A, Kraenzlin M, et al. Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:321-30
42. Stewart A, Kumar V, Reid DM. Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: a 10-year prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:413-18
43. Frediani B, Acciai C, Falsetti P, et al. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk. Calcif Tissue Int 2006;79:223-9
44. Cook RB, Collins D, Tucker J, Zioupos P. The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005;31:625-32
45. Durmaz B, Oncel S, Kirazli Y, et al. Quantitative calcaneal ultrasonometry: normative data and age-related changes for stiffness index in the Turkish population. J Clin Densitom 2006;9:217-21
46. Saadi HF, Reed RL, Carter AO, Dunn EV, Qazaq HS, Al-Suhaili AR. Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in arabian women: relation to anthropometric and lifestyle factors. Maturitas 2003;44:215-23
47. Panichkul S, Sripramote M, Sriussawaamorn N. Diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement in case finding for osteoporosis in Thai postmenopausal women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004;30:418-26