Erratum (DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.006);Endoscopic closure of colon perforation compared to surgery in a porcine model: a randomized controlled trial (with videos)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 324-332

  Raju, Gottumukkala S ^a   Fritscher Ravens, Annette ^a   Rothstein, Richard I ^a   Swain, Paul ^a   Gelrud, Andres ^a   Ahmed, Ijaz ^a   Gomez, Guillermo ^a   Winny, Markus ^a   Sonnanstine, Thomas ^a   Bergström, Maria ^a   Park, Per Ola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COLON PERFORATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HEALING; NONHUMAN; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE;

EID: 47749117925     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.047     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Luning T.H., Keemers-Gels M.E., Barendregt W.B., et al. Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 994-997
2. Tulchinsky H., Madhala-Givon O., Wasserberg N., et al. Incidence and management of colonoscopic perforations: 8 years' experience. World J Gastroenterol 12 (2006) 4211-4213
3. Levin T.R., Zhao W., Conell C., et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 145 (2006) 880-886
4. Iqbal C.W., Chun Y.S., and Farley D.R. Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review. J Gastrointest Surg 9 (2005) 1229-1235 discussion 1236
5. Misra T., Lalor E., and Fedorak R.N. Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital. Can J Gastroenterol 18 (2004) 221-226
6. Cobb W.S., Heniford B.T., Sigmon L.B., et al. Colonoscopic perforations: incidence, management, and outcomes. Am Surg 70 (2004) 750-757 discussion 757-8
7. Viiala C.H., Zimmerman M., Cullen D.J., et al. Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment. Intern Med J 33 (2003) 355-359
8. Korman L.Y., Overholt B.F., Box T., et al. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 554-557
9. Gatto N.M., Frucht H., Sundararajan V., et al. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003) 230-236
10. Ker T.S., Wasserberg N., and Beart Jr. R.W. Colonoscopic perforation and bleeding of the colon can be treated safely without surgery. Am Surg 70 (2004) 922-924
11. Araghizadeh F.Y., Timmcke A.E., Opelka F.G., et al. Colonoscopic perforations. Dis Colon Rectum 44 (2001) 713-716
12. Farley D.R., Bannon M.P., Zietlow S.P., et al. Management of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clin Proc 72 (1997) 729-733
13. Raju G.S., Shibukawa G., Ahmed I., et al. Endoluminal suturing may overcome the limitations of clip closure of a gaping wide colon perforation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 906-911
14. Raju G.S., Pham B., Xiao S.Y., et al. A pilot study of endoscopic closure of colonic perforations with endoclips in a swine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 791-795
15. Raju G.S., Ahmed I., Xiao S.Y., et al. Controlled trial of immediate endoluminal closure of colon perforations in a porcine model by use of a novel clip device (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 989-997
16. Raju G.S., Ahmed I., Shibukawa G., et al. Endoluminal clip closure of a circular full-thickness colon resection in a porcine model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 503-509
17. Raju G.S., Ahmed I., Brining D., et al. Endoluminal closure of large perforations of colon with clips in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 640-646
18. Pai R.D., Fong D.G., Bundga M.E., et al. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 428-434
19. Fong D.G., Pai R.D., and Thompson C.C. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 312-318
20. Park P.O., Bergstrom M., Ikeda K., et al. Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 601-606
21. Bergstrom M., Ikeda K., Swain P., et al. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 307-312
22. Ikeda K., Fritscher-Ravens A., Mosse C.A., et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 122-129
23. Raju G.S., Rex D.K., Kozarek R.A., et al. A novel shape-locking guide for prevention of sigmoid looping during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 59 (2004) 416-419
24. Kyzer S., Bayer I., Turani H., et al. The influence of peritoneal closure on formation of intraperitoneal adhesions: an experimental study. Int J Tissue React 8 (1986) 355-359
25. Tulandi T., and Al-Jaroudi D. Nonclosure of peritoneum: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003) 609-612
26. Liakakos T., Thomakos N., Fine P.M., et al. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management. Dig Surg 18 (2001) 260-273
27. Ellis H. Intraabdominal and postoperative peritoneal adhesions. J Am Coll Surg 200 (2005) 641-644
28. Holmdahl L. Making and covering of surgical footprints. Lancet 353 (1999) 1456-1457
29. Parker M.C., Ellis H., Moran B.J., et al. Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44 (2001) 822-829 discussion 829-30
30. Duffy D.M., and diZerega G.S. Is peritoneal closure necessary?. Obstet Gynecol Surv 49 (1994) 817-822
31. Cheong Y.C., Bajekal N., and Li T.C. Peritoneal closure-to close or not to close. Hum Reprod 16 (2001) 1548-1552
32. Zareian Z., and Zareian P. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 128 (2006) 267-269
33. Hansen A.J., Tessier D.J., Anderson M.L., et al. Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforations: indications and guidelines. J Gastrointest Surg 11 (2007) 655-659
34. Sumiyama K., Gostout C.J., Rajan E., et al. Transgastric cholecystectomy: transgastric accessibility to the gallbladder improved with the SEMF method and a novel multibending therapeutic endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 1028-1034
35. Pham B.V., Raju G.S., Ahmed I., et al. Immediate endoscopic closure of colon perforation by using a prototype endoscopic suturing device: feasibility and outcome in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 113-119
36. Fritscher-Ravens A., Mosse C.A., Mills T.N., et al. A through-the-scope device for suturing and tissue approximation under EUS control. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 737-742
37. Sclabas G.M., Swain P., and Swanstrom L.L. Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13 (2006) 23-30