Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions

Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 90-103

  Marriott, D ^a   Pampanin, S ^a   Bull, D ^a   Palermo, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BRIDGE PIERS; DAMPING; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; RETROFITTING; SEISMIC DESIGN;

GROUND MOTION CHARACTERISTICS; MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENT; RESIDUAL DEFORMATION; RETROFIT SOLUTIONS; RETROFIT STRATEGIES; SEISMIC RESISTING SYSTEM; TENSION COMPRESSIONS; UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY;

WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

EID: 47749114217     PISSN: 11749857     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.41.2.90-103     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ACLT1.2-03. (2007). ACI Manual of Concrete Practice-Special Hybrid Moment Frames Composed of Discretely Jointed Precast and Post-Tensioned Concrete Members.
2. ASCE. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 356). Reston, Virginia: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
3. BSSC. (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 273). Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
4. BSSC (2003). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450). Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
5. Chase, J. G., Hudson, N. H., Lin, J., Elliot, R. & Sim, A. (2005). Nonlinear Shake Table Identification and Control for near-Field Earthquake Testing, Journal of Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 461-482. July 2005.
6. fib. (2003a). Displacement Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.
7. fib. (2003b). Seismic Assessment and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.
8. fib. (2003c). Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Building Structures. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.
9. Holden, T. J. (2001). A Comparison of the Seismic Performance of Precast Wall Construction: Emulation and Hybrid Approaches. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
10. Kam, W. Y., Pampanin, S., Carr, A. J. & Palermo, A. (2007). Advanced Flag-Shape Systems for High Seismic Performance including Near-Fault Effects, NZSEE Annual Conference 2007, Palmerston North.
11. Kurama, Y. C. (2000). Seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls with supplemental viscous damping, ACI Structural Journal, Vol 97(4) 648-658.
12. Kurama, Y. C. (2002). Hybrid post-tensioned precast concrete walls for use in seismic regions, PCI Journal, Vol 47(5) 36-59.
13. Kurama, Y. C., Pessiki, S., Sause, R., Lu, L. & El-Sheikh, M. T. (1998a). Analytical Modelling and Lateral Load Behavior of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls. Lehigh University.
14. Kurama, Y. C., Sause, R., Lu, L. & Pessiki, S. (1999). Seismic Behaviour and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls, PCI Journal, Vol 44(3) 72-89.
15. Kurama, Y. C., Sause, R., Pessiki, S., Lu, L. & El-Sheikh, M. T. (1998b). Seismic Design and Response Evaluation of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls. Lehigh University.
16. Mander, J. B. & Cheng, C.-T. (1997). Seismic Resistance of Bridge Piers Based on Damage Avoidance Design. New York: University of Buffalo.
17. Marriott, D., Pampanin, S. & Bull, D. (2007a). Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings using Advanced Rocking Wall Solutions, NZSEE 2007 Annual Conference, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
18. Marriott, D., Pampanin, S. & Palermo, A. (2007b). Seismic Design, Experimental Response and Numerical Modelling of Rocking Bridge Piers with Hybrid, Post-Tensioned Connections. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
19. Mueller, P. (1986). Hysteretic Behaviour of Precast Panel Walls, U.S.-Japan Seminar on Precast Concrete Construction in Seismic Zones, Tokyo, Japan.
20. NZS3101. (2006). Concrete Structures Standard: Part 1-The Design of Concrete Structures. Wellington: Standards New Zealand.
21. NZSEE. (2005). Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquake. Department of Building and Housing.
22. Palermo, A., Pampanin, S. & Calvi, G. M. (2005). Concept and Development of Hybrid Solutions fro Seismic Resistant Bridge Systems, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol 9(5) 1-23.
23. Pampanin, S. (2005). Emerging solutions for high seismic performance of precast/prestressed concrete buildings, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol 3(2) 207-223.
24. Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M. & Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures. Pavia: IUSS.
25. Priestley, M. J. N., Sritharan, S., Conley, J. R. & Pampanin, S. (1999). Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building, PCI Journal, Vol 44(6) 42-67.
26. Rahman, A. M. & Restrepo, J. I. (2000). Earthquake Resistant Precast Concrete Buildings: Seismic Performance of Cantilever Walls Prestressed Using Unbonded Tendons. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
27. SEAOC. (1999). Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary. Structural Engineers Association of California.