Relating the evolution of design patterns and crosscutting concerns

SCAM 2007 - Proceedings 7th IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 180-189

  Aversano, Lerina ^a   Cerulo, Luigi ^a   Di Penta, Massimiliano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Crosscutting concerns; Design patterns; Empirical study; Mining software repositories; Software evolution

Indexed keywords

PAPER; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

CROSSCUTTING CONCERNS; DESIGN PATTERNS; EMPIRICAL STUDY; MINING SOFTWARE REPOSITORIES; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION;

DESIGN;

EID: 47749109419     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SCAM.2007.21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. R. S. Arnold and S. A. Bohner. Impact analysis - towards a framework for comparison. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 1993), Montréal, Quebec, Canada, pages 292-301. IEEE Computer Society, 1993.
2. J. M. Bieman, G. Straw, H. Wang, P. W. Munger, and R. T. Alexander. Design patterns and change proneness: An examination of five evolving systems. In 9th International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS03), pages 40-49. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
3. S. Breu and J. Krinke. Aspect mining using event traces. In 19th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004), 20-25 September 2004, Linz, Austria, pages 310-315, 2004.
4. S. Breu and T. Zimmermann. Mining aspects from version history. In S. Uchitel and S. Easterbrook, editors, 21st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2006), pages 221-230. ACM Press, September 2006.
5. M. Bruntink, A. van Deursen, R. van Engelen, and T. Tourwé. On the use of clone detection for identifying crosscutting concern code. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 31(10):804-818, 2005.
6. G. Canfora and L. Cerulo. How crosscutting concerns evolve in JHotDraw. In STEP '05: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice, pages 65-73. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
7. G. Canfora and L. Cerulo. Impact analysis by mining software and change request repositories. In 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS 2005), pages 29-38. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
8. G. Canfora, L. Cerulo, and M. Di Penta. On the use of line co-change for identifying crosscutting concern code. In 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2006), 24-27 September 2006, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pages 213-222, 2006.
9. L. Cerulo. On the Use of Process Trails to Understand Software Development. PhD thesis, University of Sannio, 2006.
10. R. Ettinger and M. Verbaere. Untangling: a slice extraction refactoring. In AOSD, pages 93-101, 2004.
11. H. Gall, M. Jazayeri, and J. Krajewski. CVS release history data for detecting logical couplings. In IWPSE '03: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, page 13. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
12. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
13. A. Garcia, C. Sant'Anna, E. Figueiredo, U. Kulesza, C. Lucena, and A. von Staa. Modularizing design patterns with aspects: a quantitative study. In AOSD '05: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, pages 3-14, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
14. R. Geiger, B. Fluri, H. C. Gall, and M. Pinzger. Relation of code clones and change couplings. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Funtamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE), number 3922 in LNCS, pages 411-425, Vienna, Austria, March 2006. Springer.
15. W. G. Griswold, J. J. Yuan, and Y. Kato. Exploiting the map metaphor in a tool for software evolution. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2001, 12-19 May 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pages 265-274, 2001.
16. J. Hannemann and G. Kiczales. Overcoming the prevalent decomposition in legacy code. In P. Tarr and H. Ossher, editors, Workshop on Advanced Separation of Concerns in Software Engineering (ICSE 2001), May 2001.
17. J. Hannemann and G. Kiczales. Design pattern implementation in java and aspectj. In OOPSLA '02: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, pages 161-173, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
18. M. Kim, V. Sazawal, D. Notkin, and G. Murphy. An empirical study of code clone genealogies. In Proceedings of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 187-196, Lisbon, Portogal, September 2005.
19. S.Kim, T. Zimmermann, K. Pan, and E. J. J.Whitehead. Automatic identification of bug-introducing changes. In ASE '06: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE'06), pages 81-90. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
20. B. Livshits and T. Zimmermann. Dynamine: finding common error patterns by mining software revision histories. In ESEC/FSE-13: Proceedings of the 10th European software engineering conference held jointly with 13th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pages 296-305. ACM Press, 2005.
21. M. Marin, A. van Deursen, and L. Moonen. Identifying crosscutting concerns using fan-in analysis. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 2007.
22. M. P. Monteiro and J. M. Fernandes. Refactoring a Java code base to AspectJ: An illustrative example. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2005), pages 17-26. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
23. G. C. Murphy, W. G. Griswold, M. P. Robillard, J. Hannemann, and W. Leong. Design recommendations for concern elaboration tools. In R. E. Filman, T. Elrad, S. Clarke, and M. Akşit, editors, Aspect-Oriented Software Development, pages 507-530. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2005.
24. L. Prechelt, B. Unger, W. F. Tichy, P. Brössler, and L. G. Votta. A controlled experiment in maintenance comparing design patterns to simpler solutions. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 27(12):1134-1144, 2001.
25. P. Tonella and M. Ceccato. Aspect mining through the formal concept analysis of execution traces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 112-121, 2004.
26. T. Tourwé and K. Mens. Mining aspectual views using formal concept analysis. In Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, pages 97-106, 2004.
27. M. Vokáč. Defect frequency and design patterns: An empirical study of industrial code. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 30:904-917, 2004.
28. R. K. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods - Third Edition. SAGE Publications, London, 2002.
29. A. T. T. Ying, G. C. Murphy, R. Ng, and M. C. Chu-Carroll. Predicting source code changes by mining revision history. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 30:574-586, sep 2004.
30. C. Zhang and H.-A. Jacobsen. PRISM is research in aSpect mining. OOPSLA Companion, 39(10):20-21, Oct. 2004.
31. T. Zimmermann, P. Weisgerber, S. Diehl, and A. Zeller. Mining version histories to guide software changes. In ICSE '04: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 563-572. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.