A hybrid approach to improving semantic extraction of news video

ICSC 2007 International Conference on Semantic Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 79-86

  Hauptmann, A G ^a   Chen, M Y ^a   Christel, M ^a   Lin, W H ^a   Yang, J ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; SEMANTICS;

CONCEPT DETECTION; FEATURE SETS; GRAPHICAL MODELS; HYBRID APPROACHES; IMAGE FEATURES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; LINGUISTIC RESOURCES; MULTIPLE RESOURCES; NEWS VIDEOS; PARAMETER TUNING; SEMANTIC EXTRACTION; TEXT RETRIEVAL; VIDEO SEMANTICS;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 47749109107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSC.2007.68     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. J. Cao, et al. Intelligent Multimedia Group of Tsinghua University at TRECVID 2006. in TRECVID Video Retrieval Evaluation. 2006. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: NIST.
2. Smeulders, A.W.M., et al., Content based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000. 22(12): p. 1349-1380.
3. Smith, J.R., Basu, S., Lin, C-Y., Naphade, M. and Tseng, B. Interactive Content-based Retrieval of Video. in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 2002. Rochester, NY.
4. Rodden, K., et al. Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? in CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 2001. New York, NY, USA,: ACM Press.
5. Markkula, M. and E. Sormunen, End-User Searching Challenges: Indexing Practices in the Digital Newspaper Photo Archive. Information Retrieval, 2000. 1(4): p. 259-285.
6. Hauptmann, A., R. Yan, and W.-H. Lin. How many high-level concepts will fill the semantic gap in news video retrieval? in International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR). 2007. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
7. Chang, S.F., R. Manmatha, and T.S. Chua. Combining text and audio-visual features in video indexing. in IEEE ICASSP'05. 2005.
8. Barnard, K., et al., Matching words and pictures. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2002. 3.
9. Naphade, M.R.a.H., T.S. Semantic Video Indexing using a Probabilistic Framework. in I.E.E.E. International Conference on Image Processing. 1998. Chicago, Il.
10. Lin, C.-Y., B.L. Tseng, and M. Naphade. VideoAL: A Novel End-to-End MPEG-7 Automatic Labeling System. in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Image Processing. 2003. Barcelona.
11. Lin, W. and A. Hauptmann. News Video Classification Using SVM-based Multimodal Classifiers and Combination Strategies. in ACM Multimedia 2002. 2002. Juan-les-Pins, France.
12. Jeon, J., V. Lavrenko, and R. Manmatha. Automatic image annotation and retrieval using cross-media relevance models. in Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 2003.
13. Wu, Y., et al. Optimal multimodal fusion for multimedia data analysis. in Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia. 2004.
14. Hauptmann, A., et al. Informedia at TRECVID 2003: Analyzing and Searching Broadcast News Video. in Proceedings of (VIDEO) TREC 2003 (Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference). 2003. Gaithersburg, MD.
15. Natsev, A.P., M.R. Naphade, and J. Te¡síc. Learning the semantics of multimedia queries and concepts from a small number of examples. in Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Multimedia,. 2005.
16. Over, P. TRECVID: TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation. 2007. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/t01v/.
17. Smeaton, A.F. and P. Over, The TREC-2002 Video Track Report. 2002.
18. Over, P., et al. TRECVID 2006 - An Overview. in TRECVID'06 Video Retrieval Evaluation. 2006. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
19. Kennedy, L. and A. Hauptmann, LSCOM Lexicon Definitions and Annotations Version 1.0, DTO Challenge Workshop on Large Scale Concept Ontology for Multimedia." Columbia University: New York.
20. Chang, S.-F., et al. Columbia University TRECVID-2006 Video Search and High-Level Feature Extraction. in TRECVID Video Retrieval Evaluation. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
21. Yanagawa, A., W. Hsu, and S.-F. Chang, Brief Descriptions of Visual Features for Baseline TRECVID Concept Detectors. 2006, Columbia University: New York, NY.
22. W. Zhao, Y.G. Jiang, and C.W. Ngo. Keyframe retrieval by keypoints: Can point-to-point matching help? in International Conf. on Image and Video Retrieval. 2006.
23. Lowe, D.G., Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004. 60(2): p. 91-110.
24. Sivic, J. and A. Zisserman. Video Google: A Text Retrieval Approach to Object Matching in Videos. in Ninth International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'03). 2003. Nice, France.
25. D. Pelleg and A. Moore. X-means: Extending k-means with efficient estimation of the number of clusters. in Proc. of the 7th Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML). 2000. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
26. Snoek, C., M. Worring, and A.G. Hauptmann, Learning rich semantics from news video archives by style analysis. TOMCCAP, 2006. 2(2): p. 91-108.
27. Hauptmann, A., et al., Can high-level concepts fill the semantic gap in video retrieval? A case study with broadcast news. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia Journal, 2007.