Ontology evaluation and ranking using OntoQA

ICSC 2007 International Conference on Semantic Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 185-192

  Tartir, Samir ^a   Arpinar, I Budak ^a  

^a University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS;

APPLICATIONS.; EXPERT USERS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; SHARE KNOWLEDGE;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 47749102942     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSC.2007.19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Alani H., Brewster C. and Shadbolt N. Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank. 5th International Semantic Web Conference. November, 5-9, 2006.
2. Aleman-Meza, B., Hakimpour, F., Arpinar, I.B., Sheth A.P. SwetoDblp Ontology of Computer Science Publications, Journal of Web Semantics (2007), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.001.
3. Anyanwu K. and Sheth A. ρ-Queries: Enabling Querying for Semantic Associations on the Semantic Web, Proceedings of the 12th Intl. WWW Conference, Hungary, 2003.
4. Arpinar, I.B., Giriloganathan, K., and Aleman-Meza, B Ontology Quality by Detection of Conflicts in Metadata. In Proceedings of the 4th International EON Workshop. May 22nd, 2006.
5. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J. and Lassila O. The Semantic Web, A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American. 2001.
6. Boley H., Tabet S. and Wagner G. Design Rationale of RuleML: A Markup Language for Semantic Web Rules. In the first Semantic Web Working Symposium. Stanford University, California, USA, 2001.
7. Broekstra J., Kampman A. and van Harmelen F. Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema. Proceedings of 1st ISWC, June 9-12th, 2002, Sardinia, Italy.
8. Corcho O., Gómez-Pérez A., González-Cabero R., and Suárez-Figueroa M.C. ODEval: a Tool for Evaluating RDF(S), DAML+OIL, and OWL Concept Taxonomies. Proceedings of the 1st IFIP AIAI Conference. Toulouse, France.
9. Cristani, M., Cuel, R. A Survey on Ontology Creation Methodologies. International Journal of Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), Vol. 1, Issue 2.
10. Paslaru P. et al. ONTOCOM: A Cost Estimation Model for Ontology Engineering. Proceedings of fifth ISWC, Athens, GA, USA. November, 2006.
11. Fernández M., Gómez-Pérez A., Pazos J., Pazos A. Building a chemical ontology using MethOntology and the ontology design environment. IEEE Intelligent Systems Applications 1999; 4(1):37-45
12. Finin T., et al. Swoogle: Searching for knowledge on the Semantic Web. In proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 05) Pittsburg, Penssylvania
13. Friedrich G. and Shchekotykhin K. A General Diagnosis Method for Ontologies. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC05), pages 232-246, 2005.
14. Gómez-Pérez A., Rojas-Amaya M. Ontological Reengineering for Reuse. Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management.
15. Guarino N. and Welty C. Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM, 45(2) 2002, pp. 61-65
16. Guha R. and McCool R.: TAP: A Semantic Web Test-bed. Journal of Web Semantics, 2003.
17. Haase P., van Harmelen F., Huang Z., Stuckenschmidt H., and Sure Y. A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In Proceedings of ISWC2005, 2005.
18. Janik M., Kochut K. BRAHMS: A WorkBench RDF Store and High Performance Memory System for Semantic Association Discovery. Fourth International Semantic Web Conference, Galway, Ireland, 6-10 November 2005
19. Lozano-Tello A. and Gomez-Perez A. ONTOMETRIC: a method to choose the appropriate ontology. Journal of Database Management 2004.
20. Miller. G. WordNet: A lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 11, 1995.
21. OWL: Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation, February 2004. (http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/).
22. Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; and Winograd, T. 1998. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Database group.
23. Parsia B., Sirin E. and Kalyanpur A. Debugging OWL Ontologies. Proceedings of WWW 2005, May 10-14, 2005, Chiba, Japan.
24. Plessers P. and De Troyer O. Ontology Change Detection Using a Version Log. In Proceedings of the 4th ISWC, 2005.
25. RDF Schema, W3C Recommendation, February 2004. (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf- schema/)
26. RDF: Resource Description Framework, W3C Recommendation, February 2004. (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210).
27. Sahoo S. et al. Knowledge Modeling and its Application in Life Sciences: A Tale of two Ontologies. The 15th WWW Conference. Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom. 2006.
28. Supekar K., Patel C. and Lee Y. Characterizing Quality of Knowledge on Semantic Web. Proceedings of AAAI FLAIRS, May 17-19, 2004, Miami Beach, Florida.
29. Tartir S. et al. OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis. Proceedings of IEEE ICDM 2005 KADASH Workshop.
30. The Gene Ontology. http://www.geneontology.org
31. The MGED Ontology http://mged.sourceforge.net/ontologies
32. Open Biomedical Ontologies http://obo.sourceforge.net/ 193-200