Considering Adaptation in Preference Elicitations

Health Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 394-399

  Damschroder, Laura J ^a   Zikmund Fisher, Brian J ^a,b   Ubel, Peter A ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

adaptation; computerized elicitation; utility

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; KNEE AMPUTATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION;

EID: 47749098854     PISSN: 02786133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.394     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bach J.R., and Tilton M.C. Life satisfaction and well-being measures in ventilator assisted individuals with traumatic tetraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75 (1994) 626-632
2. Berndtsson I.E., Lindholm E., Oresland T., and Hulten L. Health-related quality of life and pouch function in continent ileostomy patients: A 30-year perspective. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 47 12 (2004) 2131-2137
3. Boyd N.F., Sutherland H.J., Heasman K.Z., Tritchler D.L., and Cummings B.J. Whose utilities for decision analysis?. Medical Decision Making 10 (1990) 58-67
4. Brickman P., Coates D., and Janoff-Bulman R. Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1978) 917-927
5. Buehler R., and McFarland C. Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 11 (2001) 1480-1493
6. Damschroder, L. J., Muroff, J. R., Smith, D. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2005, October). A reversal in the public/patient discrepancy: Utility ratings for pain from pain patients are lower than from non-patients. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Medical Decision Making, San Francisco.
7. Damschroder L.J., Roberts T.R., Goldstein C.C., Miklosovic M.E., and Ubel P.A. Trading people versus trading time: What is the difference?. Population Health Metrics 3 1 (2005) 10
8. Damschroder L.J., Roberts T.R., Zikmund-Fisher B.J., and Ubel P.A. Why people refuse to make tradeoffs in person tradeoff elicitations: A matter of perspective?. Medical Decision Making 27 (2007) 266-280
9. Damschroder L.J., Zikmund-Fisher B.J., and Ubel P.A. The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation. Social Science & Medicine 61 2 (2005) 267-277
10. Denny E. Women's experience of endometriosis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 46 6 (2004) 641-648
11. Dersh J., Polatin P.B., and Gatchel R.J. Chronic pain and psychopathology: Research findings and theoretical considerations. Psychosomatic Medicine 64 5 (2002) 773-786
12. Diener E., Lucas R.E., and Scollon C.N. Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist 61 (2006) 305-314
13. Dijkers M.P. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: A review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 42 Suppl. 1 (2005) 87-110
14. Fagerlin A., Zikmund-Fisher B.J., Ubel P.A., Jankovic A., Derry H., and Smith D.M. Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS). Medical Decision Making 27 (2007) 672-680
15. Frederick S., and Loewenstein G. Hedonic adaptation. In: Kahneman D., Diener E., and Schwarz N. (Eds). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (1999), Russell Sage Foundation Press, New York 302-329
16. Giesler R.B., Ashton C.M., Brody B., Byrne M.M., Cook K., Geraci J.M., et al. Assessing the performance of utility techniques in the absence of a gold standard. Medical Care 37 6 (1999) 580-588
17. Gilbert D.T., Pinel E.C., Wilson T.D., Blumberg S.J., and Wheatley T.P. Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 3 (1998) 617-638
18. Groot W. Adaptation and scale of reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life. Journal of Health Economics 19 3 (2000) 403-420
19. Guitera V., Munoz P., Castillo J., and Pascual J. Quality of life in chronic daily headache: A study in a general population. Neurology 58 7 (2002) 1062-1065
20. Horgan O., and MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: A review. Disability and Rehabilitation 26 14-15 (2004) 837-850
21. Loewenstein G., and Frederick S. Predicting reactions to environmental change. In: Bazerman M.H., Messick D.M., Tenbrunsel A.E., and Wade-Benzoni K.A. (Eds). Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation (1997), New Lexington Press, San Francisco 57-72
22. Loewenstein, G., & Ubel, P. A. (2007). Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Menzel P., Dolan P., Richardson J., and Olsen J.A. The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: A preliminary normative analysis. Social Science & Medicine 55 (2002) 2149-2158
24. Miles A., Curran H.V., Pearce S., and Allan L. Managing constraint: The experience of people with chronic pain. Social Science & Medicine 61 2 (2005) 431-441
25. Rawlins M.D., and Culyer A.J. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. British Medical Journal 329 (2004) 224-227
26. Riis J., Loewenstein G., Baron J., Jepson C., Fagerlin A., and Ubel P.A. Ignorance of hedonic adaptation to hemo-dialysis: A study using ecological momentary assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (2005) 3-9
27. Smith D.M., Sherriff R.L., Damschroder L., Loewenstein G., and Ubel P.A. Misremembering colostomies? Former patients give lower utility ratings than do current patients. Health Psychology 25 (2006) 688-695
28. Tenhunen K., and Elander J. A qualitative analysis of psychological processes mediating quality of life impairments in chronic daily headache. Journal of Health Psychology 10 3 (2005) 397-407
29. Ubel P.A., Loewenstein G., and Jepson C. Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Quality of Life Research 12 6 (2003) 599-607
30. Ubel P.A., Loewenstein G., and Jepson C. Disability and sunshine: Can predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusions or emotional adaptation?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (2005) 111-123
31. Ubel P.A., Richardson J., and Baron J. Exploring the role of order effects in person trade-off elicitations. Health Policy 61 2 (2002) 189-199
32. Ville I., Ravaud J.F., and Tetrafigap Group. Subjective well-being and severe motor impairments: The Tetrafigap survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons. Social Science & Medicine 52 3 (2001) 369-384
33. Wittenberg E., Winer E.P., and Weeks J.C. Patient utilities for advanced cancer: Effect of current health on values. Medical Care 43 2 (2005) 173-181
34. Woloshin S., Schwartz L.M., Moncur M., Gabriel S., and Tosteson A.N. Assessing values for health: Numeracy matters. Medical Decision Making 21 (2001) 382-390
35. Zikmund-Fisher B.J., Smith D.M., Ubel P.A., and Fagerlin A. Validation of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS): Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Medical Decision Making 27 (2007) 663-671