Development and validation of an instrument to measure resources and support for chronic illness self-management: A model using diabetes

Diabetes Educator

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 707-718

  McCormack, Lauren A ^a   Williams Piehota, Pamela A ^a   Bann, Carla M ^a   Burton, Joseph ^a   Kamerow, Douglas B ^a   Squire, Claudia ^a   Fisher, Edwin ^b   Brownson, Carol A ^c   Glasgow, Russell E ^d  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COGNITION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION; RACE; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

CHRONIC DISEASE; COGNITION; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 47649133352     PISSN: 01457217     EISSN: 15546063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145721708321021     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson RM, Funnell MM Compliance and adherence are dysfunctional concepts in diabetes care. Diabetes Educ. 2000 ; 26: 597-604.
2. Etzwiler DD Diabetes management: the importance of patient education and participation. Postgrad Med. 1986 ; 80: 67-72.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: 2006 Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services ; June 2006. AHRQ publication 06-0588.
4. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press ; 2001.
5. Hibbard JH Engaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care. Med Care. 2003 ; 41 (1 suppl). 161-170.
6. Fisher EB, Brownson CA, O'Toole ML, et al. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Diabetes Initiative: demonstration projects emphasizing self-management. Diabetes Educ. 2007 ; 33: 83-94.
7. Wagner E. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness ? Eff Clin Pract. 1998 ; 1: 2-4.
8. Fisher EB, Brownson CA, O'Toole ML, et al. Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes. Am J Public Health. 2005 ; 95: 1523-1535.
9. Glasgow RE, Hiss RG, Anderson RM, et al. Report of the health care delivery work group: behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2001 ; 24: 124-130.
10. Wagner E. The changing face of chronic disease care. In: Accelerating Change Today for America's Health. Curing the System: Stories of Change in Chronic Illness Care. Washington, DC: The National Coalition on Health Care ; Boston: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement ; 2002: 2-5.
11. Wagner E., Austin B., Davis C., et al. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff. 2001 ; 20: 64-78.
12. McLeroy K., Bibeau D., Steckler A. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988 ; 15: 351-377.
13. Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992 ; 47: 6-22.
14. Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Whitesides H., et al. Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2005 ; 28: 2655-2661.
15. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J., et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005 ; 40 (6 pt 1). 1918-1930.
16. Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J., et al. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005 ; 43: 436-444.
17. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM Effectiveness of self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002 ; 25: 1159-1171.
18. Norris SL, Lau J., Smith SJ, et al. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002 ; 25: 1159-1171.
19. Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service ; 2000.
20. Patton MQ Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2 nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage ; 1990.
21. Tourangeau R., Rips LJ, Rasinski K. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
22. Willis GB Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage ; 2004.
23. Forsyth B., Lessler J. Cognitive laboratory methods: a taxonomy. In: Biemer P, Groves R, Lyberg L, Mathiowetz N, Sudman S, eds. Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York, NY: Wiley ; 1991: 393-418.
24. DeMaio T., Rothgeb J. Cognitive interviewing techniques: in the lab and in the field. In: Schwarz N, Sudman S, eds. Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1996: 177-196.
25. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M., et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 ; 35: 1381-1395.
26. Muthén LK, Muthén BO Mplus User's Guide. 3 rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: Muthén & Muthén ; 1998-2004.
27. Cronbach LJ Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951 ; 16: 297-334.
28. American Association of Diabetes Educators. Position statement: the scope of practice, standards of practice, and standards of professional performance for diabetes educators. Diabetes Educ. 2005 ; 31: 487-512.
29. Mensing C., Boucher J., Cypress M., et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 2004 ; 27: S143.
30. Peeples M., Mulcahy K., Tomky D., et al. The conceptual framework of the National Diabetes Education Outcomes System (NDEOS). Diabetes Educ. 2001 ; 27: 547-562.
31. Jones H., Edwards L., Vallis TM, et al. Changes in diabetes self-care behaviors make a difference in glycemic control: the Diabetes Stages of Change (DiSC) study. Diabetes Care. 2003 ; 26: 732-737.