Dynamic properties of the representation of the visual field midline in the visual areas 17 and 18 of the ferret (Mustela putorius)

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1941-1950

  Nakamura, Hiroyuki ^a,b   Chaumon, Maximilien ^a,c   Klijn, Floor ^a,d   Innocenti, Giorgio M ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Corpus callosum; Ferret; Interhemispheric interactions; Visual cortex; Visual field

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FERRET; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HEMISPHERE; INTERHEMISPHERIC TRANSFER; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; CORPUS CALLOSUM; FEMALE; FERRETS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 47649115160     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm221     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Angelucci A, Levitt JB, Walton EJS, Hupé JM, Bullier J, Lund JS. 2002. Circuits for local and global signal integration in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 22:8633-8646.
2. Azzopardi P, Jones KE, Cowey A. 1999. Uneven mapping of magnocellular and parvocellular projections from the lateral geniculate nucleus to the striate cortex in the macaque monkey. Vision Res. 39:2179-2189.
3. Berlucchi G, Rizzolatti G. 1968. Binocularly driven neurons in visual cortex of split-chiasm cats. Science. 159:308-310.
4. Brown WS, Bjerke MD, Galbraith GC. 1998. Interhemispheric transfer in normals and acallosals: latency adjusted evoked potential averaging. Cortex. 34:677-692.
5. Carrasco M, McElree B, Denisova K, Giordano AM. 2003. Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity. Nat Neurosci. 6:699-700.
6. Chen C-C, Kasamatsu T, Polat U, Norcia AM. 2001. Contrast response characteristics of long-range lateral interactions in cat striate cortex. Neuroreport. 12:655-661.
7. Derdikman D, Hildesheim R, Ahissar E, Arieli A, Grinvald A. 2003. Imaging spatiotemporal dynamics of surround inhibition in the barrel somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci. 23:3100-3105.
8. Desimone R, Moran J, Schein SJ, Mishkin M. 1993. A role for the corpus callosum in visual area 4 of the macaque. Vis Neurosci. 10:159-171.
9. Engel AK, Roelfsema PR, Fries P, Brecht M, Singer W. 1997. Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cereb Cortex. 7:571-582.
10. Gazzaniga MS. 1987. Perceptual and attentional processes following callosal section in humans. Neuropsychologia. 25:119-133.
11. Grinvald A, Lieke EE, Frostig RD, Hildesheim R. 1994. Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 14:2545-2568.
12. Hughes CM, Peters A. 1990. Morphological evidence for callosally projecting nonpyramidal neurons in rat visual cortex. Anat Embryol. 182:591-603.
13. Ikegava Y, Aaron G, Cossart R, Aronov D, Lampl I, Ferster D, Yuste R. 2004. Synfire chains and cortical songs: temporal modules of cortical activity. Science. 23:559-564.
14. Innocenti GM. 1986. General organization of callosal connections in the cerebral cortex. In: Jones EG, Peters A, editors. Cerebral Cortex. Vol. 5. New York: Plenum. p. 291-353.
15. Innocenti GM, Manger PR, Masiello I, Colin I, Tettoni L. 2002. Architecture and callosal connections of visual areas 17,18,19 and 21 in the ferret (Mustela putorius). Cereb Cortex. 12:411-422.
16. Izhikevich EM, Gally JA, Edelman GM. 2004. Spike-timing dynamics of neuronal groups. Cereb Cortex. 14:933-944.
17. Kennedy H, Meissirel C, Dehay C. 1991. Callosal pathways and their compliance to general rules governing the organization of cortico-cortical connectivity. In: Dreher B, Robinson S, editors. Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol. 3. London: Macmillan. pp 324-359.
18. Leicester J. 1968. Projection of the visual vertical meridian to cerebral cortex of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 31:371-382.
19. Lepore F, Guillemot J-P. 1982. Visual receptive field properties of cells innervated through the corpus callosum in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 46:413-424.
20. Makarov VA, Schmidt K, Castellanos NP, Lopez-Aguado L, Innocenti GM. Forthcoming. Stimulus-dependent interaction between the visual areas of the two hemispheres of the ferret (Mustela putorius). Cereb Cortex.
21. Manger PR, Kiper D, Masiello I, Murillo L, Tettoni L, Hunyadi Z, Innocenti GM. 2002. The representation of the visual field in three extrastriate areas of the ferret (Mustela putorius) and the relationship of retinotopy and field boundaries to callosal connectivity. Cereb Cortex. 12:423-437.
22. Marzi CA, Antonini A, Di Stefano M, Legg CR. 1982. The contribution of the corpus callosum to receptive fields in the lateral suprasylvian visual areas of the cat. Behav Brain Res. 4:155-176.
23. McIlwain JT. 1975. Visual receptive fields and their images in superior colliculus of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 38:219-230.
24. Morgan JE, Henderson Z, Thompson ID. 1987. Retinal decussation patterns in pigmented and albino ferrets. Neuroscience. 20:519-535.
25. Naikar N, Corballis M. 1996. Perception of apparent motion across the retinal midline following commissurotomy. Neuropsychologia. 34:297-309.
26. Payne BR. 1990. Function of the corpus callosum in the representation of the visual field in cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 5:205-211.
27. Payne BR, Siwek DF, Lomber SG. 1991. Complex transcallosal interactions in visual cortex. Visual Neurosci. 6:283-289.
28. Petersen RS, Diamond ME. 2000. Spatial-temporal distribution of whisker-evoked activity in rat somatosensory cortex and the coding of stimulus location. J Neurosci. 20:6135-6143.
29. Petersen CCH, Grinvald A, Sakmann B. 2003. Spatiotemporal dynamics of sensory responses in layer 2/3 of rat barrel cortex measured in vivo by voltage-sensitive dye imaging combined with whole-cell voltage recordings and neuron reconstructions. J Neurosci. 23:1298-1309.
30. Pillow J, Rubin N. 2002. Perceptual completion across the vertical meridian and the role of early visual cortex. Neuron. 33:805-813.
31. Ramachandran VS, Cronin-Golomb A, Myers JJ. 1986. Perception of apparent motion by commissurotomy patients. Nature. 320:358-359.
32. Roland PE, Hanazawa A, Undeman C, Eriksson D, Tompa T, Nakamura H, Valentiniene S, Ahmed B. 2006. Cortical feed-back depolarization waves: a mechanism of top-down influence on early visual areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:12586-12591.
33. Rossi AF, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. 2001. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex of macaques. J Neurosci. 21:1698-1709.
34. Rugg MD, Lines CR, Milner AD. 1984. Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia. 22:215-225.
35. Rugg MD, Milner AD, Lines CR. 1985. Visual evoked potentials to lateralized stimuli in two cases of callosal agenesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 48:367-373.
36. Saron CD, Davidson RJ. 1989. Visual evoked potential measures of interhemispheric transfer time in humans. Behav Neurosci. 103:1115-1138.
37. Slovin H, Arieli A, Hildesheim R, Grinvald A. 2002. Long-term voltage-sensitive dye imaging reveals cortical dynamics in behaving monkeys. J.Neurophysiol. 88:3421-3438.
38. Toth LJ, Rao SC, Kim D-S, Somers D, Sur M. 1996. Subthreshold facilitation and suppression in primary visual cortex revealed by intrinsic signal imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:9869-9874.
39. White LE, Bosking WH, Williams SM, Fitzpatrick D. 1999. Maps of central visual space in ferret V1 and V2 lack matching inputs from the two eyes. J Neurosci. 19:7089-7099.
40. Wilson HR, Blake R, Lee S. 2001. Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature. 412:907-910.