Cognitive control explored by linear modelling behaviour and fMRI data during Stroop tasks

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 703-710

  Liu, Jiacheng ^a,b,c   Bai, Jing ^a   Zhang, Dexuan ^d  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Linear models; Prefrontal cortex; Response times; Stroop effects

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTICES; COGNITIVE CONTROL; FMRI DATA; LINEAR MODELING; MODELING BEHAVIOUR; NEURAL INFORMATION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; RESPONSE TIME; STROOP EFFECT; STROOP TASK;

FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CINGULATE GYRUS; COGNITION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 47649114503     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/7/001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adleman N E, Menon V, Blasey C M, White C D, Warsofsky I S, Glover G H and Reiss A L 2002 A developmental fMRI study of the stroop color-word task Neuroimage 16 61-75
2. Barch D M, Braver T S, Akbudak E, Conturo T, Ollinger J and Snyder A 2001 Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain Cereb. Cortex 11 837-48
3. Botvinick M M, Cohen J D and Carter C S 2004 Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 539-46
4. Bunge S A, Hazeltine E, Scanlon M D, Rosen A C and Gabrieli J D E 2002 Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection Neuroimage 17 1562-71
5. Derrfuss J, Brass M, Neumann J and von Cramon D Y 2005 Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: meta-analyses of switching and stroop studies Hum. Brain Mapp. 25 22-34
6. Egner T, Jamieson G and Gruzelier J 2005 Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe Neuroimage 27 969-78
7. Fan J, Flombaum J I, McCandliss B D, Thomas K M and Posner M I 2003 Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict Neuroimage 18 42-57
8. Forman S D, Cohen J D, Fitzgerald M, Eddy W F, Mintun M A and Noll D C 1995 Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold Magn. Reson. Med. 33 636-47
9. Gehring W J and Knight R T 2000 Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring Nat. Neurosci. 3 516-20
10. Harrison B J, Shaw M, Yucel M, Purcell R, Brewer W J, Strother S C, Egan G F, Olver J S, Nathan P J and Pantelis C 2005 Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance Neuroimage 24 181-91
11. Hazeltine E, Bunge S A, Scanlon M D and Gabrieli J D E 2003 Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition Neuropsychologia 41 1208-17
12. Hazeltine E, Poldrack R and Gabrieli J D E 2000 Neural activation during response competition J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 118-29
13. Hopfinger J B, Buonocore M H and Mangun G R 2000 The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control Nat. Neurosci. 3 284-91
14. Kerns J G 2006 Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task Neuroimage 33 399-405
15. Kerns J G, Cohen J D, MacDonald A W, Cho R Y, Stenger V A and Carter C S 2004 Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control Science 303 1023-6
16. Kingma A, La Heij W, Fasotti L and Eling P 1996 Stroop interference and disorders of selective attention Neuropsychologia 34 273-81
17. Li X 1983 The distribution of Chinese handness Acta Psychol. Sin. 16 268-76 (in Chinese)
18. MacDonald A W, Cohen J D, Stenger V A and Carter C S 2000 Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control Science 288 1835-8
19. MacLeod C 2005 The Stroop task in cognitive research Cognitive Methods and their Application to Clinical Research ed A Wenzel and D C Rubin (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association) pp 17-40
20. MacLeod C M 1991 Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review Psychol. Bull. 109 163-203
21. Milham M P, Erickson K I, Banich M T, Kramer A F, Webb A, Wszalek T and Cohen N J 2002 Attentional control in the aging brain: insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task Brain Cogn. 49 277-96
22. Peterson B S, Skudlarski P, Gatenby J C, Zhang H P, Anderson A W and Gore J C 1999 An fMRI study of Stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems Biol. Psychiatry 45 1237-58
23. Polich J and Donchin E 1988 P300 and the word frequency effect Electroencephalography Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 33-45
24. R Development Core Team 2006 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing)
25. Ridderinkhof K R, van den Wildenberg W P M, Segalowitz S J and Carter C S 2004 Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning Brain Cogn. 56 129-40
26. Ridderinkhof K R 2002 Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks Psychol. Res. 66 312-23
27. Roelofs A and Hagoort P 2002 Control of language use: cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance Cogn. Brain Res. 15 85-97
28. Rowe J B, Toni I, Josephs O, Frackowiak R S, nbsp, J and Passingham R E 2000 The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science 288 1656-60
29. Taylor S F, Kornblum S, Lauber E J, Minoshima S and Koeppe R A 1997 Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies Neuroimage 6 81-92
30. van Veen V, Holroyd C B, Cohen J D, Stenger V A and Carter C S 2004 Errors without conflict: Implications for performance monitoring theories of anterior cingulate cortex Brain Cogn. 56 267-76
31. Wang L, Kakigi R and Hoshiyama M 2001 Neural activities during Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-MEG observation Cogn. Brain Res. 12 19-31