Evolutionary trends in the flowers of asteridae: Is polyandry an alternative to zygomorphy?

Annals of Botany

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 153-165

  Jabbour, Florian ^a,b   Damerval, Catherine ^b   Nadot, Sophie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Architectural constraints; Asteridae; Comparative analysis; Composite tree; Correlated evolution; Evolutionary scenario; Floral symmetry

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CLADISTICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICOTYLEDON; EMERGENCE; FLOWER; POLYANDRY;

ASTERIDS; CORE EUDICOTYLEDONS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 47649112698     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn082     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. APG. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APGII. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
2. Barker D, Pagel M. 2005. Predicting functional gene links using phylogenetic-statistical analysis of whole genomes. PLOS Computational Biology 1: 24-31.
3. Bateman RM, Hilton J, Rudall PJ. 2006. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 3471-3503.
4. Bernhardt P. 2000. Convergent evolution and adaptive radiation of beetle-pollinated angiosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 293-320.
5. Bremer K, Backlund A, Sennblad B, Swenson U, Andreasen K, Hjertson M, et al. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of 100+ genera and 50+ families of euasterids based on morphological and molecular data with notes on possible higher level morphological synapomorphies. Plant Systematics and Evolution 229: 137-169.
6. Cézilly F, Dubois F, Pagel M. 2000. Is mate fidelity related to site fidelity? A comparative analysis in Ciconiiforms. Animal Behaviour 59: 1143-1152.
7. Chapman EG, Foote BA, Malukiewicz J, Roeh WR. 2006. Parallel evolution of larval morphology and habitat in the snail-killing fly genus Tetanocera. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1459-1474.
8. Citerne HL, Pennington RT, Cronk QCB. 2006. An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 12017-12020.
9. Corley SB, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Coen E. 2005. Floral asymmetry involves an interplay between TCP and MYB transcription factors in Antirrhinum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 5068-5073.
10. Costa MMR, Fox S, Hanna AI, Baxter C, Coen E. 2005. Evolution of regulatory interactions controlling floral asymmetry. Development 132: 5093-5101.
11. Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
12. Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E. 1999. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401: 157-161.
13. Cubo J, Arthur W. 2001. Patterns of correlated character evolution in flightless birds: a phylogenetical approach. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 693-703.
14. Dahlgren R, Rasmussen FN, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons: structure, function and taxonomy. Springer. Berlin.
15. Damerval C, Nadot S. 2007. Evolution of perianth and stamen characteristics with respect to floral symmetry in Ranunculales. Annals of Botany 100: 631-640.
16. Donoghue MJ, Ree RH. 2000. Homoplasy and developmental constraint: a model and an example from plants. American Zoologist 40: 759-769.
17. Donoghue MJ, Ree RH, Baum DA. 1998. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends in Plant Science 3: 311-317.
18. Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Endress PK. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 (Suppl. 6): S3-S23.
20. Endress PK. 2001. Origins of flower morphology. Journal of Experimental Zoology 291: 105-115.
21. Endress PK. 2002. Morphology and angiosperm systematics in the molecular era. Botanical Review 68: 545-570.
22. Endress PK. 2006. Angiosperm floral evolution: morphological developmental framework. Advances in Botanical Research 44: 1-61.
23. Feng X, Zhao Z, Tian Z, Xu S, Luo Y, Cai Z, et al. 2006. Control of petal shape and floral zygomorphy in Lotus japonicus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 4970-4975.
24. Golz JF, Keck EJ, Hudson A. 2002. Spontaneous mutations in KNOX genes give rise to a novel floral structure in Antirrhinum. Current Biology 12: 512-522.
25. Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Hileman LC, Kramer EM, Baum DA. 2003. Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 12814-12819.
27. Irish VF. 2000. Variations on a theme: flower development and evolution. Genome Biology 1: Reviews 1015.1-1015.4.
28. Kramer EM, Irish VF. 1999. Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature 399: 144-148.
29. Kramer EM, Dorit RL, Irish VF. 1998. Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149: 765-783.
30. Kubitzki K. ed. 2004. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 6. Berlin: Springer.
31. Laurin M. 2004. The evolution of body size, Cope's rule and the origin of Amniotes. Systematic Biology 53: 594-622.
32. Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. 1995. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794-799.
33. Luo D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Clark J, Coen E. 1999. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99: 367-376.
34. Maddison WP. 1989. Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. Cladistics 5: 365-377.
35. Maddison WP. 2000. Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. Journal of Theoretical Biology 202: 195-204.
36. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1989. Interactive analysis of phylogeny and character evolution using the computer program MacClade. Folia Primatologica 53: 190-202.
37. Pagel M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 255: 37-45.
38. Pagel M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26: 331-348.
39. Pagel M, Meade A. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. The American Naturalist 167: 808-825.
40. Pagel M, Meade A, Barker D. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 53: 673-684.
41. Read AF. 1995. Inference from binary comparative data. Journal of Theoretical Biology 173: 99-108.
42. Ree RH, Donoghue MJ. 1998. Step matrices and the interpretation of homoplasy. Systematic Biology 47: 582-588.
43. Ree RH, Donoghue MJ. 1999. Inferring rates of change in flower symmetry in Asterid angiosperms. Systematic Biology 48: 633-641.
44. Reeves PA, Olmstead RG. 2003. Evolution of the TCP gene family in Asteridae: cladistic and network approaches to understanding regulatory gene family diversification and its impact on morphological evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1997-2009.
45. Rolland C, Danchin E, de Fraipont M. 1998. The evolution of coloniality in birds in relation to food, habitat, predation, and life-history traits: a comparative analysis. The American Naturalist 151: 514-529.
46. Ronse De Craene LP, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2003. Evolution of floral structures in basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164 (Suppl. 5): S329-S363.
47. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM. 2003. Evolutionary change in flowers and inflorescences: evidence from naturally occurring terata. Trends in Plant Science 8: 76-82.
48. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM. 2004. Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers: iterative patterns and developmental constraints. New Phytologist 162: 25-44.
49. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM. 2006. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of Pandanales: testing contrasting hypotheses of floral evolution. Systematic Botany 31: 223-238.
50. Sannier J, Asmussen-Lange CB, Harley M, Nadot S. 2007. Evolution of microsporogenesis in Palms (Arecaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 168: 877-888.
51. Sargent RD. 2004. Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 271: 603-608.
52. Sillen-Tullberg B. 1993. The effect of biased inclusion of taxa on the correlation between discrete characters in phylogenetic trees. Evolution 47: 1182-1191.
53. Sokoloff DD, Oskolski AA, Remizowa MV, Nuraliev MS. 2007. Flower structure and development in Tupidanthus calyptratus (Araliaceae): an extreme case of polymery among asterids. Plant Systematics and Evolution 268: 209-234.
54. Stevens PF. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 8. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
55. Stebbins GL. 1974. Flowering plants - evolution above the species level. London: Edward Arnold.
56. Summers K, McKeon CS, Heying H, Patrick W. 2007. Social and environmental influences on egg size evolution in frogs. Journal of Zoology 271: 225-232.
57. Theissen G, Becker A, Winter K, Munster T, Kirchner C, Saedler H. 2002. How the land plants learned their floral ABCs: the role of MADS-box genes in the evolutionary origin of flowers. In: Cronk QCB, Bateman RM, Hawkins JA eds. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. London: Taylor and Francis, 173-205.
58. Thorne RF. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-390.
59. Tsou C-H, Mori SA. 2007. Floral organogenesis and floral evolution of the Lecythidoideae (Lecythidaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 716-736.
60. Tucker SC. 2003. Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiology 131: 911-926.
61. Vogel S. 1974. 'Ölblumen und ölsamme lnde Bienen'. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 7: 1-267.
62. Watson L, Dallwitz MJ. 1992. The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. Version 1 June 2007. http://delta-intkey.com.
63. Weiblen GD, Oyama RK, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. The American Naturalist 155: 46-58.