Learning business law online vs. onland: A mixed method analysis

International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 54-66

  Shelley, Daniel J ^a   Swartz, Louis B ^a   Cole, Michele T ^a  

^a ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asynchronous education; E learning; Education research; Learning outcomes; Online learning community; Online teaching; Student satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 47649088638     PISSN: 15501876     EISSN: 15501337     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jicte.2008040105     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Arbaugh, J. & Hiltz, S. (2005). Improving quantitative research on aln effectiveness. In S. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning togetheronline: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 81-102). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S., & Harasim, L. (2005). The online interaction learning model: An integrated theoretical framework for learning networks. In S. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 19-37). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bernard, R., Abrami, P., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
4. Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Effectiveness for students: Comparisons of "in-seat" and aln courses. In S. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 39-79). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happen.s Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet-and Higher Education, 3, 41-61.
6. Navarro, P. & Shoemaker, J. (2000). Policy issues in the teaching of economics in cyberspace: Research design, course design, and research results. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3), 359-366.
7. Rivera, J. & Rice, M. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes and satisfaction between traditional & Web-based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, V(111).
8. Rudestam, K. & Schoenholtz-Read, J. (2002). The coming of age of adult online education. In K. Rudestam & J. Schoenholtz-Read (Eds.), Handbook of online learning: Innovations in higher education and corporate training (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University Chapel Hill, N.C.
10. Ryan, R. (2000). Student assessment comparison of lecture and online construction equipment and methods classes. THE Journal, (27) 6.
11. Shelley, D., Swartz, L., & Cole, M. (2007). A comparative analysis of online and traditional undergraduate business law classes. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(1), 10-21.
12. Schulman, A. & Sims, R. (1999). Learning in an online format versus an in-class format: An experimental study. THE Journal, 26(11), 54-56.
13. Suanpang, P., Petocz, P., & Kalceff, W. (2004). Student attitudes to learning business statistics: Comparison of online and traditional methods. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 9-20.