Change detection techniques for use in a statewide forest inventory program

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 893-901

  Wilkinson, D W ^a   Parker, R C ^a   Evans, D L ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

CHANGE DETECTION; CHANGE VECTOR ANALYSIS; ERROR MATRICES; FOREST INVENTORY; FOREST-LAND COVER CHANGE; MOST LIKELY; OVERALL ACCURACIES; VEGETATION INDEX;

FORESTRY;

AGE CLASS; CLASSIFICATION; DETECTION METHOD; FOREST INVENTORY; IMAGING METHOD;

CLASSIFICATION; ERRORS; FORESTS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INVENTORY CONTROL; KAPPA NUMBER; OPTICS; PLANTS; REMOTE SENSING; SIGNALS;

EID: 47549104615     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.74.7.893     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baatz, M., U. Benz, S. Dehghane, M. Heymen, A. Holtje, P. Hofman, I. Lingenfelder, M. Mimler, M. Sohlbach, M. Weber, and G. Willhauck, 2005. User Guide: eCognition Professional 4.0, Definiens Imaging, Munich, Germany, 468 p.
2. Bauer, M., T. Burk, A. Ek, P. Coppin, S. Lime, T. Walsh, D. Walters, W. Befort, and D. Heinzen, 1994. Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60(3):287-298.
3. Cohen, W., J. Kushla, W. Ripple, and S. Garman, 1996. An introduction to digital method in remote sensing of forest ecosystems: Focus on the Pacific Northwest, USA, Environmental Management, 20(3):421-435.
4. Cohen, W., and M. Fiorella, 1998. Comparison of methods for detecting conifer forest change with Thematic Mapper imagery, Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environment Monitoring Methods and Applications (R. Lunetta and D. Elvidge, editors), Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan, pp 89-102
5. Cohen, W., M. Fiorella, J. Gray, E. Helmer, and K. Anderson, 1998. An efficient and accurate method for mapping forest clearcuts in the pacific northwest using Landsat imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 64(4):293-300.
6. Cohen, W., T. Spies, R. Alig, D. Oetter, T. Maiersperger, and M. Fiorella, 2002. Characterizing 23 years (1972-95) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forest with Landsat imagery, Ecosystems, 5:122-137.
7. Collins, C., D. Wilkinson, and D. Evans, 2005. Multi-temporal analysis of Landsat data to determine forest age classes for the Mississippi statewide forest inventory - Preliminary results, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-temporal Remote Sensing Images, 16-18, May, Biloxi, Mississippi, IEEE, New York, unpaginated CD-ROM.
8. Conglaton, R., and K. Green, 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida, 137 p.
9. Coppin, P., and M. Bauer, 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery, Remote Sensing Reviews, 13:207-234.
10. Coppin, P., I. Jonckheere, B. Nackaerts, B. Muys, and E. Lambin,, 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(9):1565-1596.
11. Crist, E., and R. Cicone, 1984. Comparison of the dimensionality and features of simulated Landsat-4 MSS and TM Data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 14:235-246.
12. Crist, E., and R. Kauth, 1986. The tasseled cap de-mystified, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52(1):81-86.
13. Crist, E., R. Laurin, and R. Cicone, 1986. Vegetation and soil information contained in transformed Thematic Mapper data, Proceeding of IGARSS '86 Symposium, pp. 1465-1470.
14. Dymond, C., D. Mladenoff, and V. Radeloff, 2002. Phenological differences in Tasseled Cap indices improve deciduous forest classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 80:460-472.
15. Hartsell, A., and J. London, 1995. Forest statistics for Mississippi counties-1994, Resource Bulletin SO-190, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experimental Station, New Orleans, Louisana, 89 p.
16. Huang, C., B. Wylie, L. Yang, C. Homer, and G. Zylstra, 2002. Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(8):1741-1748.
17. Kauth, R., and G. Thomas, 1976. The tasseled cap - A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat, Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, 4b:41-51.
18. Laliberte, A., A. Rango, K. Havstad, J. Paris, R. Beck, R. McNeely, and A. Gonzalez, 2004. Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93:198-210.
19. Lillesand, T., R. Kiefer, and J. Chipman, 2004. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Fifth edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 763 p.
20. Lu, D., P. Mausel, E. Brondizio, and E. Moran, 2004. Change detection techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12):2365-2407.
21. Malila, W., 1980. Change vector analysis: An approach for detecting forest changes with Landsat, Proceedings of Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Symposium, 1:326-335.
22. Mas, J., 1999. Monitoring land-cover change: A comparison of change detection techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(1):139-152.
23. Michalek, J., T. Wagner, J. Luczkovich, and R. Stoffle, 1993. Multispectral change vector analysis for monitoring coastal marine environments, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 59(3):381-384.
24. Nackaerts, K., K. Vaesen, B. Muys, and P. Coppin, 2005. Comparative performance of a modified change vector analysis in forest change detection, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(5):839-852.
25. Parker, R., P. Glass, H. Londo, D. Evans, K. Belli, T. Matney, and E. Shultz. 2005. Mississippi's Forest Inventory Pilot Program: Use of Computer and Spatial Technologies in Large Area Inventories, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Bulletin FO 274, Mississippi State University, 43 p.
26. Rosenfield, G., K. Fitzpatrick-Lins, and H. Ling, 1982. Sampling for thematic map accuracy testing, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 48(1):131-137.
27. Sader, S., M. Bertrand, and E. Wilson., 2003. Satellite change detection of forest harvest patterns on an industrial forest landscape, Forest Science, 49(3):341-352.
28. Saksa, T., J. Uuttera, T. Kolstrom, M. Lehikoinen, A. Pekkarinen, and V. Sarvi, 2003. Clear-cut detection in boreal forest aided by remote sensing, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18:537-546.
29. Sant' Anna, S., C. Yanasse, P. Filho, T. Kuplich, L. Dutra, A. Frery, and P. Santos, 1995. Secondary forest age mapping in Amazonia using multi-temporal Landsat/TM imagery, Proceeding of the IGARSS 95 Symposium, pp. 323-325.
30. Singh, A., 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6):989-1003.
31. Sohl, T., 1999. Change analysis in the United Arab Emirates: An investigation of techniques, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(4):475-484.
32. Wulder, M., R. Skakun, W. Kurz, and J. White, 2004. Estimating time since forest harvest using segmented Landsat ETM+ imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93:179-187.
33. Yuan, D., and D. Elvidge, 1998. NALC land cover change detection pilot study: Washington D.C. area experiments, Remote Sensing of Environment, 66:166-178.
34. Zheng, D., D. Wallin, and Z. Hao, 1997. Rates and patterns of landscape change between 1972 and 1998 in the Changbai Mountain area of China and North Korea, Landscape Ecology, 12:241-254.