Analysis of architecture evaluation data

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1443-1455

  Bass, Len ^a   Nord, Robert ^a   Wood, William ^a   Zubrow, David ^a   Ozkaya, Ipek ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Architecture evaluation; Architecture tradeoff analysis method; Software architecture

Indexed keywords

RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

ARCHITECTURE EVALUATION; MISSION GOALS; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; RISK THEMES;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 47549102567     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Babar, M., Zhu, L., Jeffery, R., 2004. A framework for classifying and comparing software architecture evaluation methods. In: Proceedings 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 309-318.
2. Bass L., Clements P., and Kazman R. Software Architecture in Practice. second ed. (2003), Addison-Wesley
3. Beyer H., and Holtzblatt K. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems (1998), ACM Press, New York, NY
4. Boehm B., and Turner R. Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed (2003), Addison-Wesley
5. Charette R.N. Why software fails, Spectrum. IEEE 42 9 (2005) 42-49
6. Clements P., Kazman R., and Klein M. Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies (2002), Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA
7. Dobrica L., and Niemela A. A survey of architecture analysis methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 7 (2002) 638-653
8. Dominick, L, Hilliard, R., Kahane, E., Kazman, R., Kruchten. P., Kozaczynski, W., Obbink, H., Postema, H., Ran, A., Tracz, W., 2002. Software Architecture Review and Assessment (SARA) Report. .
9. Kazman, R., Bass, L., 2005. Categorizing Business Goals for Software Architectures, CMU/SEI-2005-TR-021, December.
10. ® and QAW Processes, April. .
11. van der Linden F. Software product families in Europe: the Esaps & Cafe projects. IEEE Software 19 4 (2002) 41-49