Effect of prey- and predator size on the capture success of an aquatic snake

Belgian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 191-195

  Bilcke, Joke ^a   Herrel, Anthony ^a   Aerts, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Capture; Natrix tesselata; Prey size; Specialisation

Indexed keywords

CAPTURE METHOD; DIET; HYDRODYNAMICS; PREDATOR; PREY SIZE; SNAKE; SPECIALIZATION;

NATRIX; NATRIX MAURA; SERPENTES;

EID: 47549093781     PISSN: 07776276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ARNOLD SJ (1993). Foraging theory and prey-size-predator-size relations in snakes. In: SEIGEL RA & COLLINS JT (eds), Snakes - Ecology and Behavior, McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 87-115.
2. BILCKE J, HERREL A & VAN DAMME R (2006). Correlated evolution of aquatic prey-capture strategies in European and American natricine snakes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 81: 73-83.
3. BRITO JC (2004). Feeding ecology of Vipera latastei in Northern Portugal: Ontogenetic shifts, prey size and seasonal variations. Herpetol. J., 14: 13-19.
4. DE QUEIROZ A, HENKE C & SMITH HM (2001). Geographic variation and ontogenetic change in the diet of the Mexican Pacific lowlands garter snake, Thamnophis validus. Copeia 2001: 1034-1042.
5. FILIPPI E, CAPULA M, LUISELLI L & AGRIMI U (1996). The prey spectrum of Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, 1758) and Natrix tesselata (Laurenti, 1768) in sympatric populations. Herpetozoa, 8: 155-164.
6. GALAN P (1988). Segregación ecológica en una comunidad de ofidios. Doñana, Acta Vertebr., 15: 59-78.
7. GODLEY JS, MCDIARMID RW & ROJAS NN (1984). Estimating prey size and number in crayfish-eating snakes, genus Regina. Herpetologica, 40: 82-88.
8. GREENE BD, DIXON JR, MUELLER JM, WHITING MJ & THORNTON OWJr (1994). Feeding ecology of the Concho water snake, Nerodia harteri paucimaculata. J. Herpetol., 28: 165-172.
9. GRUSCHWITZ M, LENZ S, MEBER K & LANKA V (1999). Natrix tessellata (Laurenti, 1768) - Würfelnatter. In: BÖHME W (ed), Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden, 581-644.
10. HAILEY A & DAVIES PMC (1986). Diet and foraging behavior of Natrix maura. Herpetol. J., 1: 53-61.
11. HENDERSON RW, NOESKE-HALLIN TA, CROTHER BI & SCHWARTZ A (1988). The diets of Hispaniolan Colubrid snakes II. Prey species, prey size, and phylogeny. Herpetologica, 44: 55-70.
12. HIBBITS TJ & FITZGERALD LA (2005). Morphological and ecological convergence in two natricine snakes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 85: 363-371.
13. JAYNE BC, VORIS HK & HEANG KB (1988). Diet, feeding behavior, growth, and numbers of a population of Cerberus rynchops (Serpentes: Homalopsinaein) Malaysia. Fieldiana: Zoology, New Series, 50: 1-15.
14. KING RB (1993). Microgeographic, historical and size-correlated variation in water snake diet composition. J. Herpetol., 27: 90-94.
15. KOFRON CP (1978). Foods and habits of aquatic snakes (Reptilia, Serpentes) in a Louisiana swamp. J. Herpetol. 12: 543-554.
16. LAUDER GV (1985). Aquatic feeding in lower vertebrates. In: HILDEBRAND M, BRAMBLE DM, LIEM KR & WAKE DB (eds), Functional Vertebrate Morphology, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 210-229.
17. LIND AJ & WELSH HHJR (1994). Ontogenetic changes in foraging behaviour and habitat use by the Oregon garter snake (Thamnophis atratus hydrophilus). Anim. Behav., 48: 1261-1273.
18. LITTELL RC, MILLIKEN GA, STROUP WW & WOLFINGER RD (1996). SAS® System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
19. LUISELLI L & RUGIERO L (1991). Food niche partitioning by water snakes (genus Natrix) at a freshwater environment in central Italy. J. Freshwat. Ecol., 6: 439-444.
20. MILLER DE & MUSHINSKY HR (1990). Foraging ecology and prey size in the mangrove water snake, Nerodia fasciata compressicauda. Copeia, 1990: 1099-1106.
21. MULLER M & OSSE JWM (1984). Hydrodynamics of suction in fish. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., 37: 51-135.
22. MORIGUCHI H & NAITO S (1982). Activities and food habits of Amphiesma vibakari (Boie) and Rabdophis tigrinus (Boie). The Snake, 14: 136-142.
23. MUSHINSKY JJ, HEBRARD J & VODOPICH S (1982). Ontogeny of water snake foraging ecology. Ecology, 63: 1624-1629.
24. PLEGUEZUELOS JM & MORENO M (1989). Alimentacion primaveral de Natrix maura (Linne, 1758) (Ophidia, Colubridae), en el se. de la Peninsula Iberica. Rev. Esp. Herpetol., 3: 221-236.
25. POUGH FH & GROVES JD (1983). Specializations of the body form and food habits of snakes. Am. Zool., 23: 443-454.
26. PLUMMER MV & GOY JM (1984). Ontogenetic dietary shift of water snakes (Nerodia rhombifera) in a hatchery. Copeia, 2: 550-552.
27. SANTOS X, GONZÁLEZ-SOLIS J & LLORENTE GA (2000). Variation in the diet of the viperine snake Natrix maura in relation to prey availability. Ecography, 23: 185-192.
28. SANTOS X & LLORENTE GA (1998). Sexual and size-related differences in the diet of the snake Natrix maura from the Ebro Delta, Spain. Herpetol. J., 8: 161-165.
29. SCHÄTTI B (1999). Natrix maura (Linnaeus 1758) - Vipernatter. In: BÖHME W (ed), Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden, 483-503.
30. SEIB RL (1984). Prey use in three syntopic neotropical racers. J. Herpetol., 18 (4): 412-420.
31. SHINE R (1977). Habitats, diets and sympatry in snakes: A study from Australia. Can. J. Zool., 55: 1118-1128.
32. SHINE R (1986). Sexual differences in morphology and niche utilization in an aquatic snake, Acrochordus arafurae. Oecologia, 69: 260-267.
33. SHINE R (1987). Ecological ramifications of prey size: Food habits and reproductive biology of Australian copperhead snakes (Austrelaps, Elapidae). J. Herpetol., 21: 21-28.
34. SHINE R (1991). Why do larger snakes eat larger prey items? Funct. Ecol., 5: 493-502.
35. SHINE R & SUN LX (2003). Attack strategy of an ambush predator: which attributes of the prey trigger a pit-viper's strike? Funct. Ecol., 17: 340-348.
36. SHINE R, REED RN SHETTY S & COGGER HG (2002). Relationships between sexual dimorphism and niche partitioning within a clade of sea-snakes (Laticaudinae). Oecologia, 133: 45-53.
37. SOKAL RR & ROHLF FJ (1995). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman, New York.
38. VAN LEEUWEN J (1984). A quantitative study of flow in prey capture by Rainbow trout, with general consideration of the actinopterygian feeding mechanism. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., 137: 171-227.
39. VINCENT SE, HERREL A & IRSCHICK DJ (2004). Ontogeny of intersexual head shape and prey selection in the pitviper Agkistrodon piscivorus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 81: 151-159.
40. VOGEL S (1994). Life in moving fluids: The physical biology of flow. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
41. VORIS HK & MOFFET MW (1981). Size and proportion relationship between the beaked sea snake and its prey Biotropica, 13: 15-19.
42. WEATHERHEAD PJ, BLOWN-DEMERS G & CAVEY KM (2003). Seasonal and prey-size dietary patterns of black ratsnakes (Elaphe obsoleta obsoleta). Am. Midl. Nat., 150 (2): 275-281.
43. YOUNG BA (1991). The influences of the aquatic medium on the prey capture system of snakes. J. Nat. Hist., 25: 519-531.