Combating organizational discrimination: Some unintended consequences

Discrimination at Work: The Psychological and Organizational Bases

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 353-378

  Heilman, Madeline E ^a   Haynes, Michelle C ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47549090386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611567     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Brown , R. P. , Charnsangavej , T. , Keough , K.A. , Newman , M. L. , & Rentfrow , P. J. (2000). Putting the "affirm" into affirmative action: Preferential selection and academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 736-747.
2. Clayton , S. D. , & Crosby , F. J. (1992). Justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (1979). Affirmative action guidelines (No. 44FR444). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
4. Evans , D. C. (2003). A comparison of the other-directed stigmatization produced by legal and illegal forms of affirmative action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 121-130.
5. Fiske , S. T. , Neuberg , S. L. , Beattie , A. E. , & Milberg , S. J. (1987). Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 399-427.
6. Garcia , L. T. , Erskine , N. , Hawn , K. , & Casmay , S. R. (1981). The effect of affirmative action on attributions about minority group members. Journal of Personality, 49, 427-437.
7. Glazer , N. (1988). The future of preferential affirmative action. In P. A. Katz , & D. A. Taylor , Dalmas A. (Eds.), (1988). Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy. Perspectives in social psychology (pp. 329-339). New York: Plenum Press.
8. Green , K. (1989). Affirmative action and principles of justice. New York: Greenwood.
9. Grutter v. Bollinger et al. No. 02-241, Argued April 2003, Decided June 23, 2003.
10. Hastie , R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
11. Heilman , M. E. (1984). Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 33, 174-186.
12. Heilman , M. E. , & Alcott , V. B. (2001). What I think you think of me: Women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 574-582.
13. Heilman , M. E. , Battle , W. S. , Keller , C. E. , & Lee , R. A. (1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 190-205.
14. Heilman , M. E. , & Blader , S. L. (2001). Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 188-193.
15. Heilman , M. E. , Block , C. J. , & Lucas , J. A. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536-544.
16. Heilman , M. E. , Block , C. J. , & Stathatos , P. (1997). The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 603-625.
17. Heilman , M. E. , Kaplow , S. R. , Amato , M. A. , & Stathatos , P. (1993). When similarity is a liability: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and different-sex others. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 917-927.
18. Heilman , M. E. , Lucas , J. A. , & Kaplow , S. R. (1990). Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 202-216.
19. Heilman , M. E. , Rivero , J. C. , & Brett , J. F. (1991). Skirting the competence issue: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on task choices of women and men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 99-105.
20. Heilman , M. E. , Simon , M. C. , & Repper , D. P. (1987). Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 62-68.
21. Heilman , M. E. , & Welle , B. (2002). Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Himmelfarb , G. (1988, May 15). Universities creating second-class faculties: Letter to the editor. The New York Times.
23. Holloway , F. (1989). What is Affirmative Action? In F. Blanchard & F. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 9-19). New York: Springer-Verlag.
24. Jacobson , C. K. (1985). Resistance to affirmative action: Self-interest or racism? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 306-329.
25. Jacobson , M. B. , & Kosh , W. (1977). Women as leaders: Performance evaluation as a function of methods of leader selection. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 20, 149-157.
26. Kanter , R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965-990.
27. Kelley , H. H. (1987). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones & D. E. Kanouse (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1-26). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Kravitz , D. A. (1995). Attitudes toward affirmative action plans directed at Blacks: Effects of plan and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 2192-2220.
29. Kravitz, D. A., Harrison, D. A., Turner, M. E., Levine, E. L., Chaves, W., Brannick, M. T., Demmomg, D. L., Ruddell, C. J., & Conard, M. A. (1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, OH: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
30. Kravitz, D. A., & Klineberg, S. L. (2000). Reactions to two versions of affirmative action among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 597-611.
31. Kravitz, D. A., & Platania, J. (1993). Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 928-938.
32. Krueger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). The use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 187-195.
33. Kunda, Z., & Sherman-Williams, B. (1992). Stereotypes and construal of individuating information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 90-99.
34. Locksley, A., Hepburn, C., & Ortiz, V. (1982). Social Stereotypes and judgment of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 23-42.
35. Lubove, S. (1997). Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Forbes, 160, 122-134.
36. Major, B., Feinstein, J., & Crocker, J. (1994). Attributional ambiguity of affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 113-141.
37. Nacoste, R. W. (1985). Selection procedure and responses to affirmative action: The case of favorable treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 225-242.
38. Nacoste, R. W. (1990). Sources of stigma: Analyzing the psychology of affirmative action. Law and Policy, 12, 175-195.
39. Nacoste, R. W. (1996). Social psychology and the affirmative action debate. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 261-282.
40. Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267-276.
41. Nisbitt, R. E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248-277.
42. Northcraft, G. B., & Martin, J. (1982). Double Jeopardy: Resistance to affirmative action from potenetial beneficiaries. In B. A. Gutek (Ed.), Sex role stereotyping and affirmative action policy (pp. 81-130). Los Angeles: University of California, Institute of Industrial Relations.
43. Pettigrew, T. F., & Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41-78.
44. Pyszczynkski, T. A., & Greenberg, J. (1981). Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing. Academy of Management Review, 19, 786-820.
45. Richard, O. C., & Kirby, S. L. (1998). Women recruits' perceptions of workforce diversity program selection decisions: A procedural justice examination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 183-188.
46. Sackett, P. R., DuBois, C. L., & Noe, A. W. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 928-938.
47. Seligman, D. (1973, March). How "equal opportunity" turned into employment quotas. Fortune, 158-168.
48. Steele, S. (1990). The content of our character: A new vision of race in America. New York: Morrow.
49. Summers, R. J. (1991). The influence of affirmative action on perceptions of a beneficiary's qualifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1265-1276.
50. Taylor Carter, M. A., Doverspike, D., & Cook, K. D. (1996). The effects of affirmative action on the female beneficiary. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 71, 31-54.
51. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352) (Title VII), Volume 42 of the United States Code, Section 2000e.
52. Tomasson, R. F., Crosby, F. J., & Herzberger, S. D. (1996). Affirmative action: The pros and cons of policy and practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlegfeild.
53. Tosi, H. L., & Einbinder, S. W. (1985). The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 712-723.
54. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
55. Wilkerson, I. (1991). Remedy for racism past has new kind of shackles. The New York Times, p. 11. New York: East Coast.
56. Wycliff, D. (1990, June 10). Blacks debate the costs of affirmative action. The New York Times, p. 3.