Identification of yellow stringybark (Eucalyptus muelleriana) and silvertop ash (E. sieberi) wood is improved by canonical variate analysis of ray anatomy

Australian Forestry

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 94-99

  Evans, Phil ^a,b   Heady, Roger ^b   Cunningham, Ross ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Canonical analysis; Eucalyptus muelleriana; Eucalyptus sieberi; Identification; Rays; Separation; Silvertop ash; Wood anatomy; Yellow stringybark

Indexed keywords

BUILDING MATERIALS; DEFECTS; FLOORS; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); MANUFACTURE; SEPARATION;

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; EUCALYPTUS MUELLERIANA; EUCALYPTUS SIEBERI; RAYS; WOOD ANATOMY; YELLOW STRINGYBARK;

WOOD;

EUCALYPTUS MUELLERIANA; EUCALYPTUS SIEBERI; IDENTIFICATION; MANUFACTURE; SEPARATION; WOOD;

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS MUELLERIANA; EUCALYPTUS SIEBERI; GLEHNIA;

EID: 47549088268     PISSN: 00049158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2008.10676275     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Angyalossy-Alfonso, V., and Miller, R. B., 2002. Wood anatomy of the Brazilian species of Swartzia and considerations within the tribe Swartzieae. International Association of Wood Anatomists Journal, 23:359–390.
2. Blackith, R. E., and Reyment, R. A., 1971. Multivariate Morphometries. 412London:Academic Press.
3. Brunner, M., Eugster, R., Trenka, E., and Gergamin-Strotz, L., 1996. FT-NIR spectroscopy and wood identification. Holzforschung, 50:130–134.
4. Bootle, K. R., 2005. Wood in Australia. Types Properties and Uses. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Sydney, 452 pp.
5. Cookson, L. J., 2004. The in-ground natural durability of Australian timbers. Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation Report No. PN04.1001, 12 pp.
6. Dadswell, H. E., 1931. The Identification of Wood by Chemical Means. Part I. Commonwealth of Australia, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Division of Forest Products, Melbourne. Technical Paper No. 1, 16 pp.
7. Dadswell, H. E., 1972. The Anatomy of Eucalypt Woods. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Forest Products Laboratory, Division of Applied Chemistry Technological Paper No. 66, 28 pp. (plus 6 A3 sheets).
8. Dadswell, H. E., and Burnell, M., 1932. Methods for the Identification of the Coloured Woods of the Genus Eucalyptus. Commonwealth of Australia, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin No. 67, Division of Forest Products, Melbourne. Technical Paper No. 5, 50 pp. (plus 34 plates).
9. Dadswell, H. E., Burnell, M., and Eckersley, A. M., 1934. Methods for the Identification of the Light-Coloured Woods of the Genus Eucalyptus. Commonwealth of Australia, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin No. 78, Division of Forest Products, Melbourne. Technical Paper No. 12, 60 pp. (plus 41 plates).
10. Genstat. 2000. Genstat for Windows. Release 4.3. 5th edn. VSN International Ltd, Oxford.
11. Ilic, J., 1997. Woods of Eucalyptus—Part 1. Distinguishing three species from the ash group (E. regnans, E. delegatensis. E. obliqua). International Association of Wood Anatomists Journal, 18:27–36.
12. Ilic, J., 2002. Woods of Eucalyptus—Part 2. Distinguishing species from the stringybark group (E. baxteri, E. globoidea, E. muelleriana, E. macrorhyncha, E. consideniana. E. sieberi). International Association of Wood Anatomists Journal, 23:305–318.
13. Jane, F. W., 1970. The Structure of Wood. London:Adam and Charles Black. 2nd edn. 478
14. Phillips, B. F., Campbell, N. A., and Wilson, B. R., 1973. A multivariate study of geographic variation in the whelk. Dicanthais. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 11:27–69.
15. Schimleck, L. R., Michell, A. J., and Vinden, P., 1996. Eucalypt wood classification by NIR spectroscopy and principal components analysis. Appita Journal, 49:319–324.
16. Tsuchikawa, S., 2007. A review of recent near infrared research for wood and paper. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 42:43–71.