Private sector participation in the power sector in Europe and Central Asia: Lessons from the last decade

World Bank Working Paper

Volumn , Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1-118

  Krishnaswamy, Venkataraman ^a   Stuggins, Gary ^a  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; POWER GENERATION; PRIVATE SECTOR;

ASIA; CENTRAL ASIA; EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 4744373937     PISSN: 17265878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, RE, Markus Tamas. 1999. Privatization of Power and Natural gas Industries in Hungary and Kazakhstan. World Bank Technical Paper No.451. World Bank, Washington, DC.
2. Bacon, RW, J. Besant-Jones. 2001. Global Electric Power Reform, Privatization and Liberalization of the Electric Power Industry in Developing Countries. Annual Reviews. Energy and Environment 2001.26: 331-359pp.
3. Berry, Carolyn A and William Meroney. 2001. California Power Crisis: Implications for the Power Sector in Emerging Economies. Presentation. World Bank, Washington, DC.
4. Besant-Jones, J, B.Tenenbaum. 2001. The California Experience with Power Sector Reform: Lessons for Developing Countries. World Bank/ESMAP. Washington, DC.
5. Besant-Jones, J. 1999. The Impact of Financial Crises on the Power Sector of Transition Countries. Energy After the Crisis. Energy and Development Report. pp 24-32. World Bank/ESMAP, Washington, DC.
6. CIGRE. 2001. Review of Industry Structure and Reform Status.
7. Confusion Grows over Hungarian Style Liberalization. Power in East Europe, Issue No.71, November 23, 2001.
8. Electricity Restructuring and Privatization in UK. Electricity Reform Abroad and US Investment. 2001. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/pgem/electric/ch2.html
9. End of the Road for NRG's Narva Deal? Power in East Europe, Issue No.71, November 23, 2001.
10. Experiences From the Nordic Power Exchange. Presentation by Nordic Pool Consultants AS. World Bank/EU Power Exchange Workshop. Brussels, March 7-8, 2002.
11. Federal Trade Commission Staff, USA. 2001. Competition and Consumer Protection Perspectives on Electric Power Regulatory Reform: Focus on Retail Competition.
12. Haas, Reinhard and Hans Auer. 2001. How to Ensure Effective Competition in Western European Electricity Markets. News Letter Third Quarter 2001. International Association of Energy Economics, Cleveland, OH.
13. Hoskote, Mangesh et ale. 2000. An Analysis of Electricity Distribution Privatization in Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington, DC.
14. Huffaker, John. 2001. An Open Letter to Emerging Market Electricity Regulators. Power in East Europe, Issue No.72, December 10, 2001.
15. Krishnaswamy, V. 1999. Non-Payment in the Electricity Sector in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union Countries. World Bank Technical Paper No.423. World Bank, Washington, DC.
16. Lamech, Ranjit and Kazim Saeed. 2002. Private Power Investors in Developing Countries. Survey 2002- Preliminary Findings. Energy Forum, June 2002, World Bank.
17. Lieberman, Ira L. et al. 2002. Europe and Central Asia: Privatization Policy Note (draft). World Bank, Washington, DC.
18. Lovei, Lazlo. 2000. The Single-Buyer Model. View Point Note No.225. World Bank, Washington, DC.
19. MacKerron, Gordon. 2001. Costs and Benefits of 100% Electricity Market Opening. Energy Regulation Brief. National Economic Research Associates. London, UK.
20. Midttun, Atle (Ed).2001. European Energy Industry Business Strategies. Elsivier Sciences Ltd. Oxford, UK.
21. Nellis, John. 2002. The World Bank, Privatization and Enterprise Reform in Transition Economies. OED, World Bank, Washington, DC.
22. Oxford Analytica Brief. 2002. Estonia/EU: Energy Agreement (E).
23. Refinancing Risk in the Power Sector- The Preponderance of "Mini-Perm" Debt. Standard and Poor's Utilities and Perspectives, New York. September 9, 2002.
24. Renewing Our Energy Business. Presentation to the Energy and Mining Sector Board, May 22, 2001. World Bank, Washington, DC.
25. Sharma, Deepak. 2002. Australian Electricity Reform: A Regulatory Quagmire. News Letter Second Quarter 2002. International Association of Energy Economics, Cleveland, OH.
26. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P. 2000. California's Flawed Market. What went wrong and How to Fix it. News Letter Fourth Quarter 2000. International Association of Energy Economics, Cleveland, OH.
27. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P. 2001a. FERC Buckles Under Pressure, Unveils New Price Mitigation Plan. News Letter Third Quarter 2001. International Association of Energy Economics, Cleveland, OH.
28. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P. 2001b. California's Electricity Crisis Continues. News Letter First Quarter 2001. International Association of Energy Economics, Cleveland, OH.
29. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P. 2002. Sobering Realities of Liberalizing Electricity Markets. News Letter Third Quarter 2002. International Association of Energy Economics, Cleveland, OH.
30. Smith, Rebecca. 2000. Gloom and Doom. New Rules, Demands Put Dangerous Strain on Electricity Supply. Wall Street Journal, May 11, 2000. New York.
31. Sweeting, Andrew. 2000. The Wholesale Market for Electricity in England and Wales: Recent developments and Future Reforms. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
32. USEA. 2000. Power Sector Privatization in Central/Eastern Europe and Eurasia: Results and Future Plans. Conference Proceedings, Budapest, Hungary, June 6-8, 2000.
33. Western Interests. Power in East Europe, Issue No. 76, February 18, 2002.
34. World Bank. 1993. The World Bank's Role in the Electric Power Sector. World Bank Policy Paper. Washington, DC.
35. Yates, Philip. 1998. Improving Power System Efficiency in Developing Countries Through Performance Contracting. Industry and Energy Department Working Paper. Energy Series Paper No.4. World Bank, Washington, DC.
36. Zaheer, Salman and Dennis Clarke. 2001. Power Privatization Prospects: Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Role of the World Bank Group. Presentation. World Bank, Washington, DC.