Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 767-776

  Solhjem, Matthew C ^a   Davis, Brian J ^a,b   Pisansky, Thomas M ^a   Wilson, Torrence M ^a   Mynderse, Lance A ^a   Herman, Michael G ^a   King, Bernard F ^a   Geyer, Susan M ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Brachytherapy; Computed tomography; Prostate cancer; Transrectal ultrasound; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING;

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (CI); MEAN VALUES; PROSTATE VOLUME;

ULTRASONICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICRODOSIMETRY; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; RADIOISOTOPE THERAPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TUMOR VOLUME; VOLUMETRY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRACHYTHERAPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; HUMANS; IODINE RADIOISOTOPES; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 4744369787     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Nag S., Bice W., DeWyngaert K., et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 46:2000;221-230
2. Lee W.R., Roach M., Michalski J., et al. Interobserver variability leads to significant differences in quantifiers of prostate implant adequacy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 54:2002;457-461
3. Al-Qaisieh B., Ash D., Bottomley A.M., et al. Impact of prostate volume evaluation by different observers on CT-based post-implant dosimetry. Radiat Oncol. 62:2002;267-273
4. Sech S., Montoya J., Girman C.J., et al. Interexaminer reliability of transrectal ultrasound for estimating prostate volume. J Urol. 166:2001;125-129
5. Smith S., Wallner K., Merrick G., et al. Interpretation of pre- versus post-implant TRUS images. Med Phys. 30:2003;920-924
6. Prestidge B.R., Prete J.J., Buchholz T.A., et al. A survey of current clinical practice of permanent prostate brachytherapy in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 40:1998;461-465
7. Badiozamani K.R., Wallner K., Cavanagh W., Blasko J. Comparability of CT-based and TRUS-based prostate volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 43:1999;375-378
8. Hoffelt S.C., Marshall L.M., Garzotto M., et al. A comparison of CT scan to transrectal ultrasound-measured prostate volume in untreated prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 57:2003;29-32
9. Helmick B., Tarver R., Chan R., et al. Evaluation of post-plan dosimetry using TRUS and CT after transperineal prostate seed implant. Med Dosim. 27:2002;289-293
10. Brinkmann D.W., Kline R.W. Automated seed localization from CT datasets of the prostate. Med Phys. 25:1998;1667-1672
11. Bangma C.H., Qais A., Niemer H.J., et al. Transrectal ultrasonic volumetry of the prostate In vivo comparison of different methods. Prostate. 28:1996;107-110
12. Tong H.S., Cardinal N., McLoughlin R.F., et al. Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 24:1998;673-681
13. Dubois D.F., Prestidge B.R., Hotchkiss L.A., et al. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. Radiology. 207:1998;785-789
14. Han B.H., Wallner K., Merrick G., et al. Prostate brachytherapy seed identification on post-implant TRUS images. Med Phys. 30:2003;898-900
15. Davis B.J., Kinnick R.R., Fatemi M., et al. Measurement of the ultrasound backscatter signal from three seed types as a function of incidence angle Application to permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 574:2003;1174-1182
16. Grado G.L., Larson T.R., Balch C.S., et al. Actuarial disease-free survival after prostate cancer brachytherapy using interactive techniques with biplane ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 42:1998;289-298
17. Tong S., Downey D.B., Cardinal H.N., et al. A three-dimensional ultrasound prostate imaging system. Ultrasound Med Biol. 22:1996;735-746
18. Elliot T.L., Downey D.B., Tong S., et al. Accuracy of prostate volume measurements in vitro using three-dimensional ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 3:1996;401-406
19. Holmes D.R., Davis B.J., Bruce C.J., Robb R.A. 3D visualization, analysis, and treatment of the prostate using trans-urethral ultrasound. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 27:2003;339-349
20. Speight J.L., Shinohara K., Pickett B., et al. Prostate volume change after radioactive seed implantation Possible benefit of improved dose volume histogram with perioperative steroid. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 48:2000;1461-1467
21. Waterman F.M., Dicker A.P. Impact of post-implant edema on V100 and D90 in prostate brachytherapy Can implant quality be predicted on day 0? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 53:2002;610-621
22. Waterman F.M., Yue N., Corn B.W., et al. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry An analysis based on serial CT acquisition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 41:1998;1069-1077
23. Gong L., Cho P.S., Han B.H., et al. Ultrasonography and fluoroscopic fusion for prostate brachytherapy dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 54:2002;1322-1330
24. Todor D.A., Zaider M., Cohen G.N., et al. Intraoperative dynamic dosimetry for prostate implants. Phys Med Biol. 48:2003;1153-1171
25. Su Y, Davis BJ, Herman MJ, LaJoie WN, Robb RA. Brachytherapy seed localization from fluoroscopic images using a statistical classifier. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Medical Image Computing & Computer Assisted Intervention 2003, p. 945-946