Plea bargaining practices: Less covert, more public support?

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 590-614

  Herzog, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Covertness; Factorial survey; Plea bargaining; Public support

Indexed keywords

EID: 4744365105     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128703262112     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Alschuler, A. (1968). The prosecutor's role in plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review, 36, 50-112.
2. Alschuler, A. (1976). The trial judge's role in plea bargaining, Part 1. Columbia Law Review, 76, 1059-1154.
3. Applegate, B., Cullen, F., Link, B., Richards, P., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1996). Determinants of public punitiveness toward drunk driving: A factorial survey approach. Justice Quarterly, 13(1), 57-79.
4. Ashworth, A. (1993). Victim impact statements and sentencing. Criminal Law Review, 7, 498-509.
5. Ashworth, A. (1998). The criminal process: An evaluative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 97 (1977).
7. Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 360-5 (1978).
8. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2002). Statistical abstract of Israel. Jerusalem: Author.
9. Cohen, A., & Abman-Muller, E. (2001). Passive judge or active judge? A suggestion for a judicial involvement in plea bargaining. Mishpatim, 31(3), 745-765.
10. Cohen, S., & Doob, A. (1989). Public attitudes to plea bargaining. Criminal Law Quarterly, 32(1), 85-109.
11. Cullen, F., Fisher, B., & Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Daudistel, H. (1980). On the elimination of plea bargaining: The El Paso experiment. In W. McDonald & J. Cramer (Eds.), Plea bargaining (pp. 57-74). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
13. Emmelman, D. (1996). Trial by plea bargain: Case settlement as a product of recursive decision-making. Law and Society Review, 30(2), 335-360.
14. Erez, E. (1994). Victim participation in sentencing: And the debate goes on ... International Review of Victimology, 3, 17-32.
15. Fagan, R. (1981). Public support for the courts: An examination of alternative explanations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9(6), 403-417.
16. Flanagan, T. (1987). Change and influence in popular criminology: Public attributions of crime causation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15(2), 231-243.
17. Flanagan, T., & Caufield, S. (1984). Public opinion and prison policy: A review. Prison Journal, 64: 39-59.
18. Flanagan, T., McGarrell, E., & Brown, E. (1985). Public perceptions and criminal courts: The role of demographic and related attitudinal data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(1), 66-82.
19. Gifford, D. (1983). Meaningful reform of plea bargaining: The control of prosecutorial discretion. University of Illinois Law Review, pp. 37-98.
20. Golash, D., & Lynch, J. (1995). Public opinion, crime seriousness, and sentencing policy. American Journal of Criminal Law, 22(3), 703-732.
21. Haberfeld, M., & Herzog, S. (2000). The criminal justice system in Israel. In O. Ebbe (Ed.), Comparative and international criminal justice systems: Policing, judiciary and corrections (pp. 55-78). New York: Butterworth-Heinemman.
22. Hall, D. (1991). Victim voices in criminal court: The need for restraint. American Criminal Law Review, 28, 233-266.
23. Harnon, E. (1997). Plea bargaining in Israel: The adequate distribution of roles between prosecution and court and the status of the victim. Mishpatim, 27(3), 543-604.
24. Heller, N., & McEwen, T. (1975). Applications of crime seriousness information in a police department. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 44-50.
25. Herman, G. (1997). Plea bargaining. Charlottesville, VA: Lexis Law.
26. Heumann, M., & Loftin, C. (1979). Mandatory sentencing and the abolition of plea bargaining: The Michigan felony firearm statute. Law and Society Review, 13(2), 393-430.
27. Jacoby, J., & Cullen, F. (1999). The structure of punishment norms: Applying the Rossi-Berk model. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 59(1), 245-312.
28. LaFree, G. (1985). Adversarial and nonadversarial justice: A comparison of guilty pleas and trials. Criminology, 23(2), 289-312.
29. Marenin, O. (1995). The state of plea bargaining in Alaska. Journal of Crime and Justice, 18(1), 167-197.
30. McCorkle, R. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime & Delinquency, 39(2), 240-252.
31. McCoy, C. (1993). Politics and plea bargaining: Victim's rights in California. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
32. Nasheri, H. (1998). Betrayal of due process: A comparative assessment of plea bargaining in the United States and Canada. New York: University Press of America.
33. Odegard, E. (1995). Legality and legitimacy: On attitudes to drugs and social sanctions. British Journal of Criminology, 35(4), 525-542.
34. Rich, R., & Sampson, R. (1990). Public perceptions of criminal justice policy: Does victimization make a difference? Violence and Victims, 5(2), 109-118.
35. Roberts, J. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 16, pp. 99-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Rosett, A., & Cressey, D. (1976). Justice by consent. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
37. Rossi, P., & Anderson, A. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction, In P. Rossi & S. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 15-78). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Rossi, P., & Berk, R. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
39. Rossi, P., Simpson, J., & Miller, J. (1985). Beyond crime seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1(1), 59-89.
40. Rossi, P., Waite, E., Bose, C., & Berk, R. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39(2), 224-237.
41. Rubel, H. (1986). Victim participation in sentencing proceedings. Criminal Law Quarterly, 28, 226-250.
42. Sanborn, J. (1993). Philosophical, legal, and systemic aspects of juvenile court plea bargaining. Crime & Delinquency, 39(4), 509-527.
43. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 260-1 (1971).
44. Sarat, A. (1975). Support for the legal system: An analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. American Politics Quarterly, 5(1), 3-24.
45. Schlesinger, J., & Malloy, D. (1981). Plea bargaining and the judiciary: An argument for reform. Drake Law Review, 30, 581-597.
46. Scott, R., & Stuntz, W. (1992). Plea bargaining as contract. Yale Law Journal, 101, 1909-1968.
47. Sellin, T., & Wolfgang, M. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
48. Thomson, D., & Ragona, A. (1987). Popular moderation versus governmental authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments toward criminal sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 337-357.
49. Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. London: Yale University Press.
50. Victim Support. (1995). The rights of victims of crime. London: Author.
51. Warr, M. (1989). What is the perceived seriousness of crimes? Criminology, 27(4), 795-821.
52. Welling, S. (1987). Victim participation in plea bargains. Washington University Law Quarterly, 65(2), 301-356.
53. Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., Tracy, P., & Singer, S. (1985). The national survey of crime severity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
54. Wundersitz, J., Naffine, N., & Gale, F. (1991). The production of guilt in the juvenile justice system: The pressures to "plead." Howard Journal, 30(3), 192-206.