Direct coronary stenting by transradial approach: Rationale and technical issues

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 215-219

  Burzotta, Francesco ^a,d   Hamon, Martial ^b   Trani, Carlo ^a   Kiemeneij, Ferdinand ^c  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^d NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Direct stenting; Percutaneous coronary interventions; Radial approach

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GUIDE WIRE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY DISEASE; HUMANS; RADIAL ARTERY; STENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 4744362817     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20126     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barbato E, Marco J, Wijns W. Direct stenting. Eur Heart J 2003;34:394-403.
2. Burzotta F, Trani C, Prati F, Hamon M, Mazzari M, Mongiardo R, Sabatier R, Boccanelli A, Schiavoni G, Crea F. Comparison of outcomes (early and 6-month) of direct stenting with conventional stenting (a meta-analysis of ten randomized trials). Am J Cardiol 2003;91:790-796.
3. Boulmier D, Bedossa M, Commeau P, Huret B, Gilard M, Boschat J, Brunel P, Leurent B, Le Breton H. Direct coronary stenting without balloon predilation of lesions requiring long stents: immediate and 6-month results of a multicenter prospective registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:51-58.
4. Timurkaynak, MD, Ciftci H, Ozdemir M, Atiye C, Tavil Y, Kaya M, Erdem G, Cemru M, Dortlemez O, Dortlemez H. Sidebranch occlusion after coronary stenting with or without balloon predilatation: direct versus conventional stenting. J Invas Cardiol 2002;14:497-501.
5. Atmaca Y, Ertas F, Gülec S, Dincer I, Oral D. Effect of direct stent implantation on minor myocardial injury. J Invas Cardiol 2002;14:443-446.
6. Nageh T, Thomas MR, Sherwood RA, Harris BM, Jewitt DE, Wainwright RJ. Direct stenting may limit myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invas Cardiol 2003;15:115-118.
7. Loubeyre C, Morice MC, Lefévre T, Piéchaud JF, Louvard Y, Dumas P. A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:15-21.
8. Rogers C, Parich S, Seifert P, Edelman ER. Endogenous cell seeding: remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996;94:2909-2914.
9. Baim DS, Flatley M, Caputo R, O'Shaughnessy C, Low R, Fanelli C, Popma J, Fitzgerald P, Kuntz R. Comparison of pre-dilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using the medtronic ave s670 coronary stent system (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1364-1369.
10. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transardial coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995;129:1-7.
11. Laarman GJ, Muthusamy TS, Swart H, Westendorp I, Kiemeneij F, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Direct coronary stent implantation: safety, feasibility and predictors of success of the strategy of direct coronary stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:443-448.
12. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the ACCESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275.
13. Mann T, Cowper PA, Perteson ED, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, Giron L, Cantor WJ, Newman WN, Schneider JE, Jobe RL, Zellinger MJ, Rose GC. Trans-radial coronary stenting: comparison with femoral access closed with arterial suture device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:157-159.
14. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Slagboom T, Odekerken D. Outpatient coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:323-327.
15. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, Schneider JE, Arrowood M, Newman WN, zellinger MJ, Rose GC. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:572-576.
16. Hamon M, Sabatier R, Zhao Q, Niculescu R, Valette B, Grollier G. Mini-invasive strategy in acute coronary syndromes: direct coronary stenting using 5 Fr guiding catheters and trans-radial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;55:340-343.
17. Choussat R, Black A, Bossi I, Fajadet J, Marco J. Vascular complications and clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty with platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade: comparison of trans-radial vs transfemoral arterial access. Eur Heart J 200;21:662-667.
18. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Völzke H, Felix SN. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French trans-radial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:172-176.
19. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Schneider J, Arrowood M. Left internal mammary artery intervention: the left radial approach with a new guide catheter. J Invas Cardiol 2000;12:298-302.
20. Lorin J, Robin B, Lochow P, Lorenzo A, Sedlis SP. The right radial approach for stenting of lesions in the right coronary artery with anomalous take-off from the left sinus of valsalva. J Invas Cardiol 2000;12:478-480.
21. Hamon M. Right transradial approach: catheter selection and manipulation. In: Hamon M, McFadden E, editors. Transradial approach for cardiovascular interventions. Carpiquet: Europa Stethoscope Media; 2003. p 39-54.
22. Ohanessian A, Spaulding C, Varenne O, Salengro E, Allouch P, Belaouchi, Gaultier C. Left transradial approach: catheter selection and manipulation. In: Hamon M, McFadden E, editors. Transradial approach for cardiovascular interventions. Carpiquet: Europa Stethoscope Media; 2003. p 55-66.