Goldmann tonometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: Comparison between retreated and nonretreated patients

Cornea

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 674-679

  Sanchis Gimeno, Juan A ^a,b,c   Lleó Pérez, Antonio ^b   Rahhal, Saleh M ^b   Alonso, Luis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b Rahhal Ophthalmology Clinic   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Excimer laser; Goldmann tonometry; Hyperopia; Intraocular pressure; LASIK

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; RETREATMENT; TONOMETRY;

ADULT; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETREATMENT; TIME FACTORS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 4744357553     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000130189.95297.39     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alonso-Muñoz L, Lleó-Perez A, Rahhal MS, et al. Assessment of applanation tonometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2002;21:156-160.
2. Wang X, Shen J, McCulley JP, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK. CLAO J. 2002;28:136-139.
3. Agudelo LM, Molina CA, Alvarez DL. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:472-474.
4. Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landao D, et al. Intraocular pressure after LASIK for hyperopia. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1659-1661.
5. Goker S, Er H, Kahvecioglu C. Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct hyperopia from +4.25 to +8.00 diopters. J Refract Surg. 1998;14:26-30.
6. Zadok D, Maskaleris G, Montes M, et al. Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Ophthalmology. 2000;107: 1132-1137.
7. Ojeimi G, Waked N. Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 1997;13(5 Suppl):S432-S433.
8. Zadok D, Maskaleris G, Garcia V, et al. Outcomes of retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2391-2394.
9. Ozdamar A, Aras C, Bahcecioglu H, et al. Secondary laser in situ keratomileusis 1 year after primary LASIK for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:383-388.
10. Mulhern MG, Condon PI, O'Keefe M. Myopic and hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis retreatments: indications, techniques, limitations, and results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1278-1287.
11. Perez-Santonja JJ, Ayala MJ, Sakla HF, et al. Retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:21-28.
12. Lyle WA, Jin GJ. Retreatment after initial laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:650-659.
13. Schipper I, Senn P, Thomann U, et al. Intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg. 1995;11: 366-370.
14. Patel S, Aslanides IM. Main causes of reduced intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (letter). J Refract Surg. 1996; 12:673.
15. Faucher M, Gregoire J, Blondeau P. Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:832-838.
16. Mardelli PG, Piebenga LW, Whitacre MM, et al. The effect of excimer laser photoreftactive keratectomy on intraocular presure measurents using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology. 1997;104: 195-198.
17. Chaterjee A, Shah S, Bessant SA, et al. Reduction in ocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: correlation with pretreatment myopia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:355-359.
18. Cennamo G, Rosa N, La Rana A, et al. Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica. 1997; 211:341-343.
19. Munger R, Mintsioulis G, Jackson WB. Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy. Can J Ophthalmol. 1998;33:159-165.
20. Abbasoglu KE, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, et al. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2193-2196.
21. Argento C, Cosentino MJ, Moussalli MA. Intraocular pressure measurement following hyperopic LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:145.
22. Rosa N, Cennamo G, Breve MA, et al. Goldmann applanation tonometry after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 76:550-554.
23. Zadok D, Tran DB, Twa M, et al. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1344-1348.
24. Sanchis Gimeno JA, Alonso L, Aguilar L, et al. Influence of refraction on tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2000;19:512-516.
25. Burvenich H, Sallet G, De Clercq J. The correlation between IOP measurement central corneal thickness and corneal curvature. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2000;276:23-26.
26. Garzozi HJ, Chung HS, Lang Y, et al. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea. 2001;20:33-36.
27. Montes-Mico R, Chapman WN. Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:228-235.
28. El Danasoury MA, El Maghraby A, Coorpender SJ. Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:97-104.
29. Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:420-427.
30. Feltham MH, Stapleton F. Change in central corneal thickness following laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000;28:185-187.
31. Kozak I, Hornak M, Juhas T, et al. Changes in central corneal thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis and photoreftactive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:149-153.
32. Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, et al. Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:220-224.
33. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:767-772.
34. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34-43.
35. Johnson M, Kass MA, Moses RA, et al. Increased corneal thickness simulating elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96:664-665.
36. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:592-596.
37. Shah S, Spedding C, Bhojwani R, et al. Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1191-1193.
38. Mills RP. If intraocular pressure measurement is only an estimate-then what? Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1807-1808.
39. Singh RS, Goldberg I, Graham SL, et al. Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:206-210.