How do sessile dioecious species cope with their males?

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 163-173

  Barot, Sébastien ^a   Gignoux, Jacques ^b  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^b UPMC University Paris 06   (France)

Author keywords

Competition for space; Dioecy; Dispersal stochasticity; Invasion criterion; Lottery model; Seed dispersal; Sessile organisms

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); SEED DISPERSAL; SESSILE SPECIES; STOCHASTICITY;

ARTICLE; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; STATISTICS;

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 4744352271     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baker H.G. Self-compatibility and establishment after long-distance dispersal. Evolution. 9:1955;347-349
2. Baker H.G. Support for baker's law-as a rule. Evolution. 21:1967;853-856
3. Bawa K.S. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:1980;15-39
4. Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Amer. Nat. 112:1978;975-997
5. Charnov, E., Maynard Smith, J., 1976. Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature 263, 125-126.
6. Chesson P. General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theort. Popu. Biol. 58:2000;211-237
7. Chesson P.L., Warner R.R. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. Amer. Nat. 17:1981;923-943
8. Crawley, M.J.(Ed.), 1996. Sex. In: Plant Ecology, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
9. Cressie N.A.C. Statistics For Spatial Data. 1993;Wiley, New York
10. Dieckmann, U., 1997. Can adaptive dynamics invade? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 128-131.
11. Gignoux, J., 1994. Modélisation de la coexistence herbes/arbres en savane. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, Paris, France.
12. Heilbuth J.C. Lower species richness in dioecious clades. Amer. Nat. 156:2000;221-241
13. Heilbuth J.C., Ilves K.L., Otto S.P. The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal. modelling the seed-shadow handicap Evolution. 55:2001;880-888
14. Howe H.F., Smallwood J. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13:1982;201-228
15. Hurtt G.C., Pacala S.W. The consequences of recruitment limitation. reconciling chance, history and competittive differences between plants J. Theoret. Biol. 176:1995;1-12
16. Kisdi E., Geritz S. Adaptive dynamics in allele space. evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in heterogeneous environment Evolution. 53:1999;993-1008
17. Kisdi E., Geritz S.A.H. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation in diploid populations. Proc. Roy Soc. London B. 267:2000;1671-1678
18. Maynard Smith, J., 1989. The evolution of breeding systems II. Some consequences of sex. In: Evolutionary genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
19. Metz J.A.J., Nisbet R.M., Geritz S.A.H. How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:1992;198-202
20. Pannell J.R., Barrett C.H. Baker's law revisited. reproductive assurance in a metapopulation Evolution. 5:1998;657-668
21. Renner S.S., Ricklefs R.E. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Amer. J. Bot. 82:1995;596-606
22. Schupp W., Fuentes M. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal and the unification of plant population ecology. Ecoscience. 2:1995;267-275
23. Shmida A., Ellner S. Coexistence of plant species with similar niche. Vegetatio. 58:1984;29-55
24. Thomson J.D., Barrett S.C.H. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection, and the evolution of dioecy in plants. Amer. Nat. 118:1981;443-449
25. Thomson J.D., Brunet J. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:1990;11-16
26. Wilson W.G., Harder L.D. Reproductive uncertainty and the relative competitiveness of simultaneous hermaphroditism versus dioecy. Amer. Nat. 162:2003;220-241
27. Wolfram S. The Mathematica Book. 1996;Wolfran Media/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK