Gauge fields, geometric phases, and quantum adiabatic pumps

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 91, Issue 18, 2003, Pages

  Zhou, Huan Qiang ^a   Cho, Sam Young ^a   McKenzie, Ross H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CHARGE; ELECTRON BEAM PUMPING; ELECTRONS; ENERGY DISSIPATION; GROUND STATE; MAGNETIZATION; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY;

GAUGE FIELDS; QUANTUM ADIABATIC PUMPING; SINGLE ELECTRONS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 4744351707     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.186803     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. D.J. Thouless, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083 (1983).10.1103/PhysRevB.27.6083
2. B.L. Altshuler and L.I. Glazman, Science 283, 1864 (1999).10.1126/science.283.5409.1864
3. P. Sharma and C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 096401 (2001); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.096401
4. E.R. Mucciolo, C. Chamon, and C.M. Marcus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 146802 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.146802
5. T. Aono, Phys. Rev. B 67, 155303 (2003); 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.155303
6. M. Governale, F. Taddei, and R. Fazio, cond-mat/0211211.
7. M. Switkes et al, Science 283, 1905 (1999); 10.1126/science.283.5409.1905
8. For an alternative interpretation, see P.W. Brouwer, Phys. Rev. B 63, 121303 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.121303
9. S.K. Watson, R.M. Potok, C.M. Marcus, and V. Umansky, cond-mat/0302492.
10. F. Zhou, B. Spivak, and B. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 608 (1999); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.608
11. J.E. Avron et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236601 (2001);
12. A. Andreev and A. Kamenev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1294 (2000);
13. T.A. Shutenko et al, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10?366 (2000);
14. J.E. Avron et al, Phys. Rev. B 62, R10?618 (2000).
15. There is a difference of factor�2 between our result and Eq.�(5) in Y. Makhlin and A.D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 276803 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.276803
16. M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 392, 45 (1984).
17. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2111 (1984).10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2111
18. J. Moody, A. Shapere, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 893 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.893
19. A. Zee, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevA.38.1
20. For a recent discussion of the relation between Berry’s phase and the pumped charge in a Cooper pair pump, see M. Aunola and J.J. Toppari, Phys. Rev. B 68, 020502 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.020502
21. P.W. Brouwer, Phys. Rev. B 58, R10?135 (1998).
22. M. Büttiker, H. Thomas, and A. Prêtre, Z. Phys. B 94, 133 (1994);
23. M. Moskalets and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 66, 035306 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.66.035306
24. J.E. Avron et al, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 3415 (2002).
25. B. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2167 (1983); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2167
26. Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593 (1987); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1593
27. J. Samuel and R. Bhandari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2339 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2339
28. J.X. Zhu and A.V. Balatsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 286802 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.286802
29. C.H. Gu, Phys. Rep. 80, 251 (1981).
30. H.C. Manoharan, C.P. Lutz, and D.M. Eigler, Nature (London) 403, 512 (2000).10.1038/35000508
31. M. Farle, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 755 (1998); 10.1088/0034-4885/61/7/001
32. M. Bode, M. Getzlaff, and R. Wiesendanger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4256 (1998); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4256
33. S. Heinze et al, Science 288, 1805 (2000).10.1126/science.288.5472.1805
34. D. Ralph, Science 291, 999 (2001).